

Conclusion
As
described in this paper, dental informatics is important in many ways to
clinical practice. Since the number of computer systems and the frequency
of their use increase constantly in a dental environment, it is getting more
difficult to distinguish between basic and special purpose needs. Along
the path of a dental patient entering and leaving the dental office, we have
shown existing hardware solutions as well as software packages and identified
current developments in diagnostics and treatment modalities. New systems
can be purchased almost on a daily basis and only budgetary considerations limit
the number of stand-alone systems in a dental office. The worst case could
be that none of these systems can exchange any data or images. Challenges
for the next few years for software developers will be to make sure that their
system can 'talk' to another as well as issues of portability. The
usefulness of their products in the newly evolving digital dental office will
decide on recognition. Dental professionals, on the other hand, need to
accept that purchasing alone is not a final step. Increased readiness to
get training on the new system and purchasing costly solutions as teams of three
and more dentists are major challenges to reach the break-even point of
investment earlier. Here, dental informatics can help to find the right
way to a digital clinical practice. However, significant efforts and
investments are needed to transform theories and concepts into real-world
solutions to improve dental practice. The ADA's coordination with other
disciplines in the healthcare informatics activities ensures compatibility of
the oral health and general health information domains; this coordination will
help the dentist to be one of the earliest beneficiaries of interoperable
systems and enterprise architectures that have a Life Cycle perspective.
This perspective will greatly help achieve the economic benefits of the
information architecture.