References
Note:  Links to citations open in a new browser window.  To return to this page, just close the newly opened browser window by clicking on the X in the upper right hand corner of the window.

  1. Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The Use of space maintainers at a UK pediatric dentistry department. J Dent Child. 1999; 66: 383-386.

  2. Croll TP. Light-hardened luting cement for orthodontic bands and appliances. Pediatr Dent. 1999; 21:121-123.

  3. Hill CJ, Sorenson HW, Mink JR. Space maintenance in a child dental care program. J Am Dent Assoc. 1975; 90: 811-815.

  4. Kisling E, Hoffding J. Premature loss of primary teeth: Part IV, A Clinical Control of Sannerud’s Space Maintainer, Type I. J Dent Child. 1979; 46: 17-21.

  5. Olmez H, Korunmus F, Olmez S. Direkt-Bonding sistemle uygulanan sabit yer tutucuların koparma kuvvetlerine karşı dayanıklılıklarının incelenmesi. Turk Ortodonti Derg. 1974; 7: 123-126.

  6. Qudeimat MA, Fayle SA. The longevity of space maintainers: a retrospective study.   Pediatr Dent. 1998; 20: 267-272.

  7. Simsek S, Yilmaz Y, Gurbuz T. The clinical evaluation of simple fixed space maintainers bonded with a flow resin composite. 1st International Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry Congress. 2002; 97: September.

  8. Wright GZ, Kennedy DB. Space control in the primary and mixed dentitions. Dent Clin North Am. 1978; 22: 579-601.

  9. Artun J, Marstrander PB. Clinical efficiency of two different types of direct bonded space maintainers. J Dent Child. 1983; 50: 197-204.

  10. Santos VLC, Almeida MA, Mello HAS, Keith O. Direct bonded space maintainers. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1993; 17: 221-225.

  11. Swaine TJ, Wright GZ. Direct bonding applied to space maintenance. J Dent Child. 1976; 43:21-25.

  12. Kirzioglu Z, Yilmaz Y. A longitudinal observation of the simple space maintainers bonded by resin composite (English Abstract). Atatürk Univ Dis Hek Fak Derg. 1999; 9: 47-53.

  13. Mockers O, Deroze D, Camps J. Cytotoxicity of orthodontic bands, brackets and archwires in vitro. Dent Mater. 2002; 18: 311-317.

  14. Yilmaz Y, Simsek S, Yuksel Kocogulları ME. An In vitro evaluation of adhesive strength of the simple space maintainers on different deciduous teeth surfaces. 9 th International Dental Congress of TDA. 2002; 167, June.

  15. Croll TP. Prevention of gingival submergence of fixed unilateral space maintainers. J Dent Child. 1982; 49: 48-51.

  16. Baroni C, Franchini A, Rimondini L. Survival of different types of space maintainers. Pediatr Dent. 1994; 16: 360-361.

  17. Baume LJ. Physiological tooth migration and its significance for the development of occlusion: II. The biogenesis of accessional dentition. J Dent Res. 1950; 29: 331-337.

  18. Brown RA, Beck JS. Survival analysis. In: Brown RA, Beck JS. Medical Statistics on Personal Computers, Ed. London: BMJ Publishing Group, 1995: 99-118.

  19. Davies JA. Dental restoration longevity: a critique of the life table method of analysis. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1987; 15: 202-204.

  20. Elderton RJ. Longitudinal study of dental treatment in the general dental service in Scotland. Br Dent J. 1983; 155: 91-96.

  21. Hitchcock HP. Preventive orthodontics. In: SB Finn Ed Clinical Pedodontics, Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1973: 342-369.

  22. Thorton JB. The space maintainer: case reports of misuse and failures. Gen Dent.1982; 30: 64-67.

  23. Weinberger SJ. Treatment modalities for primary incisors. J Can Dent Assoc.1989; 55: 807-811.

  24. McCabe JF. Applied Dental Materials. London: Mass Publishing Co., 1990: 157-172.

  25. Opdam NJ, Roete JJ, Peters TC, Burgersdijk RC, Teunis M. Cavity wall adaptation and voids in adhesive  class I resin composite restorations. Dent Mater. 1996; 12: 230-235.
Page 8 of 9
Citation Number:
Vol.7, No.2, Page 102