INTRODUCTION

Orthodontic treatment these days is increasing in demand and becoming a more common practice for improvement in the esthetic quality not only in children but also in adults. Commonly used titanium-based archwires in orthodontic practice are known for their good quality, pseudoelastic properties, and high corrosion resistance due to formation of a stable oxide layer.1,2 For a patient undergoing orthodontic treatment, it is important for the orthodontist to prescribe the use of fluoride-containing products, such as mouthwashes and gels to help prevent dental caries and maintain healthy oral health.3,4 Most commonly prescribed fluoride mouthwashes are available in 0.05 and 0.2% fluoride concentrations, which have to be used weekly and even daily to prevent caries. Thus, the orthodontic wires are continuously being exposed to fluorides which may affect their properties and quality.5 Nickel titanium archwires are known to be comparatively more stable and resistant to corrosion than stainless steel archwires. Many studies have also reported a negative effect on the corrosion resistance of NiTi wires.6,7 However, still, little information is available in the literature on the adverse effects of such materials on orthodontic wires. Thus, the aim of this in vitro study was to assess and evaluate the effects of fluoride prophylactic agents on mechanical properties of NiTi wires during orthodontic treatment using SEM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For the present study, we used the commercially available round preformed NiTi orthodontic archwire (3M, Inc., Minnesota, USA) and three different mouthwash solutions. The fluoride agents selected in the study were those commonly prescribed by the orthodontists in their clinical practice. The fluoride agents thus used were Phos-Flur gel (1.1% sodium APF, 0.5% w/v fluoride, pH = 5.1; Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals) and Prevident 5000 (1.1% sodium fluoride neutral agent, 0.5% w/v fluoride, pH = 7; Colgate Oral Pharmaceuticals). The archwire was cut into 0.017ʺ × 0.25ʺ segments and was immersed in 5 mL of the respective fluoride solutions in glass containers and incubated at 37°C for 1.5 hours. For the control group, we used deionized water as a solution. After the predetermined time, all the specimens were removed from the solutions and rinsed properly with distilled water and were then transferred to the other new vials and sent for mechanical testing. For mechanical testing, the specimens were tested in a heated distilled water bath (37°C) to simulate the aqueous oral environment. All the specimens were subjected to a three-point bending test on a universal testing machine. Compressive load was applied using the machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min to the center of each wire. Each specimen was loaded to a deflection of 2.5 mm and then unloaded to zero deflection at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. To observe the surface morphological changes, one wire from each group was randomly selected and observed under a SEM.

Statistical Significance and Results

All the observations of the mechanical properties were calculated and tabulated for comparison and sent for statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software, version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Analysis of variance test was used to test the level of significance; p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant for all the tests. All the results were analyzed and were tabulated. Each wire was analyzed in three different mediums, and means of modulus of elasticity and yield strength were calculated both while loading and unloading (Table 1). It was observed that there was not much of difference in the values of both modulus of elasticity and yield strength obtained after loading of stress on the wires in all the three experimental conditions. Also, a significant difference in both modulus of elasticity and yield strength was found during unloading of stress. When both the fluoride gels were compared with the control, it was observed that these fluoride gels significantly decreased the modulus of elasticity and yield strength during unloading forces. Further, when the surface characteristics were observed for all the specimens using SEM images, it was observed that NiTi wires treated with Phos-Flur showed large surface defects which appeared as round, pitted areas depicting corrosion, numerous white inclusions, and overall damaged surface structure of the wire as compared with the control (Figs 1 and 2). Next, for the NiTi wire treated with Prevident, it was observed that the surface changes, such as dark areas, white inclusions, and pitting corrosion were present, but they were less severe as compared with the results of Phos-Flur gel and the control (Fig. 3).

Table 1

Loading and unloading properties of NiTi wires after treatment in different solutions

Type of wireTreatment doneMean of modulus of elasticity on loading (GPa)Mean of modulus of elasticity on unloading (GPa)Mean of yield strength on loading (MPa)Mean of yield strength on unloading (MPa)
NiTiDistilled water (control)62.40 ± 2.561.80 ± 3.52360 ± 560.121523 ± 80.42
      Phos-Flur gel61.25 ± 2.761.15 ± 2.92120 ± 480.341422 ± 52.30
      Prevident60.40 ± 1.860.30 ± 1.22128 ± 320.321211 ± 51.22
Cu-NiTiDistilled water (control)56.42 ± 2.8256.40 ± 3.503018 ± 540.121483 ± 28.35
      Phos-Flur gel57.19 ± 2.1357.18 ± 2.302860 ± 360.121327 ± 42.13
      Prevident56.21 ± 2.0554.25 ± 3.482540 ± 560.121214 ± 32.20
Fig. 1

Scanning electron microscope images showing treatment with distilled water

jcdp-19-283-g001.tif
Fig. 2

Scanning electron microscope images showing treatment with Phos-Flur gel

jcdp-19-283-g002.tif
Fig. 3

Scanning electron microscope images showing treatment with Prevident gel

jcdp-19-283-g003.tif

DISCUSSION

Usually, it is observed that orthodontic treatment is accompanied by compromised oral hygiene that can lead to demineralization of the teeth and later can progress to caries. Accumulation of plaque on the brackets and wires and inability to clean these areas can lead to such major problems. Many patients with periodontal problems during orthodontic treatment develop caries and for this they need different mouthwashes to reduce plaque accumulation. Various studies have reported that only 2% of patients using fluoride applications developed white spot lesions, whereas about 58% of patients who did not practice any fluoride application developed lesions.8,9 Thus, the importance of using fluorides during orthodontic treatment in preventing caries and periodontal problems is justified. Thus, prescribing mouthwashes is a common practice for the orthodontists. Within the brackets, the efficacy of the sliding mechanics of the wires is affected by the friction produced between the two interfaces. Smoothness of wire plays a major role in this mechanics. Any alteration in the surface of the wire or the structural changes will definitely compromise the sliding property of the archwires in the brackets, thereby affecting ultimately the forces and tooth movement and the treatment outcome.

The commonly used titanium-based archwires in orthodontic practice are known for their good quality, pseudoelastic properties, and high corrosion resistance due to formation of a stable oxide layer as a result of passivation. Metallic materials are found to be non-susceptible to corrosion as long as the surface oxide film is intact. However, once the oxide layer dissolves, there occurs surface structural changes, such as corrosion and pitting on the surface of the wire.6,10 The results of our study showed a significant difference in both modulus of elasticity and yield strength during loading and unloading of stress. Further, when both the fluoride gels were compared with the control, it was observed that these fluoride gels significantly decreased the modulus of elasticity and yield strength during unloading forces. Our results were in accordance with the study of Koushik et al11 who also reported similar findings in their study. On the contrary, Schwaninger and Sarkar,12 when evaluated the flexural properties, such as modulus of stiffness, flexural yield strength, and fatigue after treatment of wires, concluded that corrosion does not affect the archwire properties. Hammad et al,13 in their study on the mechanical and surface properties of translucent composite wires after fluoride treatment, found that fluoride therapy significantly decreased the strength of composite wires in comparison with a distilled water control group. Yokoyama et al14 in their study explained the reason for the ductility loss and the reduction in the tensile strength of the work-hardened NiTi alloy in 2.0% APF solution. They suggested that there is a formation of a brittle layer at the peripheral part of the cross-section which is associated with rapid absorption of hydrogen. Thus, it can be stated that the fluoride applications can cause an increase in absorption of hydrogen on the surface of the wires and can lead to corrosion and pitting. In our study, we used two fluoride prophylactic preparations, of which one had a pH of 5.1 and the other one of 7. The association of corrosion and the pH of the fluoride solution used is also a significant relation. Nakagawa et al15 described the importance of this relation. They reported that the corrosion of titanium archwires is enhanced in an acidic environment because F ion in the solution combines with H+ ions to form HF, even if the NaF concentration is low. Watanabe and Watanabe16 reported an increase in the surface roughness of NiTi-based archwires on exposure to fluoride treatment or application. Walker et al1 also reported an increase in surface roughness, corrosion, pitting, and presence of inclusion bodies on the surface of the NiTi wires after exposure to the fluoride prophylactic agents.

Further, when surface topography was evaluated using SEM, it was observed that NiTi wires treated with Phos-Flur showed large surface defects which appeared as round, pitted areas depicting corrosion, numerous white inclusions, and overall damaged surface structure of the wire as compared with the control and the ones treated with Prevident. Thus, here also, our results prove that both pH and fluoride concentrations are important factors related to surface corrosion of titanium-based alloys. The surface changes were found to be more pronounced in the Cu-NiTi archwires, which can be explained due to the presence of metallic copper resulting in increased susceptibility to pitting corrosion. Heravi et al17 in their study using SEM demonstrated that the shape of corrosion pits was also different for different NiTi group wires and its smoother surface contrasted the rough surface of other wires. They explained this based on the cold working/manufacturing of these wires.

Thus, the clinical significance of our study lies in the fact that it has been proved that fluoride mouthwashes/gels do affect the structural surface qualities and strength of archwires used during the orthodontic treatment irrespective of the composition of the wires. Thus, it is the responsibility of the doctor to prescribe these prophylactic agents carefully while keeping in mind their pH so that the overall result of the treatment may not be hampered and delayed due to change in properties of the wires used.

CONCLUSION

Fluoridated mouthwashes are a must to maintain the good oral hygiene and decrease instance of caries in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. However, along with this, they have adverse effects on the quality of the wires and properties as well. Thus, such prophylactic agents should be used with caution and there occurs need of new mouthwashes with less deleterious effects on the mechanical properties of the archwires used for orthodontic treatment.

Conflicts of interest

Source of support: Nil

Conflict of interest: None