The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Different Pretreatment Methods on Dentin Bond Strength of a One-step Self-etch Adhesive

Emel Karaman, A. Rüya Yazici, Atila Ertan, Güi Özgünaltay, Berrin Dayangaç

Citation Information : Karaman E, Yazici AR, Ertan A, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Effect of Different Pretreatment Methods on Dentin Bond Strength of a One-step Self-etch Adhesive. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (1):41-48.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-1-41

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-01-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of a one-step self-etch adhesive to dentin pretreated with phosphoric acid, air abrasion, or laser.

Methods and Materials

Fifty-six extracted non-carious human mandibular molars were mounted and the occlusal surfaces ground with a mechanical grinder to obtain flat occlusal dentin surfaces. The teeth were randomly divided into four groups of 14 teeth according to the different dentin surface pretreatment methods: Group I- Acid, Group II- Laser, Group III- Air abrasion, Group IV (Control)- No surface treatment. After applying a one-step self-etch adhesive system, Futura Bond NR, cylinders of Z250 composite resin were bonded to the dentin surfaces by transparent gelatin capsules (2.5 mm diameter; 3 mm high) and then polymerized. All specimens were stored in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours. Shear bond testing was carried out using an Universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/sec. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests at a significance level of 0.05.

Results

The bond strength of air abrasion (Group III) and the control group (Group IV) were statistically higher than both the acid (Group I) and laser (Group II) pretreatments (p<0.05). No statistically significant differences were found in shear bond strength between surfaces treated with air abrasion and the control group (p>0.05). Surfaces pretreated with laser (Group II) resulted in the lowest bond strength which was not statistically different from those pretreated with acid (Group I) (p>0.05).

Conclusion

Surfaces pretreated with acid and laser adversely affected the bond strength of a one-step selfetch adhesive, Futura Bond NR, while pretreatment with air abrasion had no effect on bond strength.

Clinical Significance

The pretreatment of dentin surfaces prior to self-etch adhesive seems to be unnecessary and defeats the original purpose of these systems.

Citation

Yazici AR, Karaman E, Ertan A, Özgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Effect of Different Pretreatment Methods on Dentin Bond Strength of a One-step Self-etch Adhesive. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 January; (10)1:041-048.


PDF Share
  1. Aggressiveness of contemporary self-etching systems. I: Depth of penetration beyond dentin smear layers. Dent Mater 2001; 17(4):296-308.
  2. Adhesion of single application bonding systems to bovine enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27(1):88-94.
  3. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2005; 7(2):117-26.
  4. Conditioning effect on dentin, resin tags and hybrid layer of different acidity self-etch adhesives applied to thick and thin smear layer. J Dent 2006; 34(10):775-783.
  5. Bond strength of composite to dentin treated by air abrasion. Oper Dent 1999; 24(4):223-232.
  6. A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin. Oper Dent 2002; 27(4):360-366.
  7. Effects of Nd: YAG laser, air abrasion and acid etching on human enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2001; 26(5):476-481.
  8. A laser-powered hydrokinetic system for caries removal and caries preparation. JADA 2000; 131(6):777-785.
  9. Er:YAG Laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: Relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage. Lasers Surg Med 2006; 38(6):615-623.
  10. Morphologic study of Nd: YAG laser usage in treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Endod 2004; 30(3):131-134.
  11. Lasers in dentistry. Separating science from hype. JADA 2004; 135(6):204-212.
  12. Indications and limitations of Er: YAG laser application in dentistry. Am J Dent 2006; 19(3):178-186.
  13. Experimental studies of the application the Er: YAG laser on dental hard substances: I. Measurement of ablation rate. Laser Surg Med 1989; 9(4):338-344.
  14. Experimental studies of the application the Er: YAG laser on dental hard substances: II.Light microscopic and SEM investigations. Laser Surg Med 1989; 9(4):345-351.
  15. Bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 2004; 29(2):176-81.
  16. Bond strength of a mild self-etch adhesive with and without prior acid-etching. J Dent 2006; 34(1):77-85.
  17. Influence of dentin acidetching and NaOCl-treatment on bond strengths of self-etch adhesives. Am J Dent 2008; 21(1):44-48.
  18. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent Res 1998; 26(1):1-20.
  19. Influence of additional acid etch treatment on resin cement dentin infiltration. J Prosthodont 2000;9(2):77–81.
  20. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2002; 15(5): 305-308.
  21. Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on self-etching bond strengths. J Esthet Rest Dent 2004;16(1):33-40
  22. Effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation distance on superficial dentin morphology. Am J Dent 2006; 19(4):217-221.
  23. Bonding to Er: YAG laser treated dentin. J Dent Res 2002; 81(2):119-122.
  24. Differences in bonding to acid-etched or Er: YAG - laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84(3);280-288.
  25. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium: YAG lased vs. bur cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110(4):322-329.
  26. Effect of Er: YAG laser on bond strength of a self-etching primer and two single-bottle adhesive systems. Lasers Surg Med 2002; 31(3):164-170.
  27. Shear bond strength and SEM evaluation of composite bonded to Er: YAG laser-prepared dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 2005; 21(7):616-624.
  28. Influence of air abrasion and long-term storage on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin. Oper Dent 2007; 32(3):217-224.
  29. Influence of smear layer pretreatments on bond strength to dentin. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4(3):191-196.
  30. Effect of previous treatments on bond strength of two self-etching adhesive systems to dental substrate. J Adhes Dent 2007;9(3):291–296.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.