The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 3 ( May, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Posts on the Fracture Resistance of Load-cycled Endodontically-treated Premolars Restored with Direct Composite Resin

Sara Majidinia, Marjaneh Ghavamnasiri, Hila Hajizadeh, Mohammad Sadegh Namazikhah, Mohammad Javad Moghaddas

Citation Information : Majidinia S, Ghavamnasiri M, Hajizadeh H, Namazikhah MS, Moghaddas MJ. Effect of Posts on the Fracture Resistance of Load-cycled Endodontically-treated Premolars Restored with Direct Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (3):10-17.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-3-10

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the fracture resistance and failure mode of premolars restored with composite resin using various prefabricated posts.

Methods and Materials

Sixty sound maxillary premolars were divided into four equal sized groups. All but the control group received endodontic treatment followed by placement of mesiodistocclusal (MOD) composite restorations (Tetric Ceram) as follows: Group T = no post, Group DT = fiber reinforced composite (FRC) post (DT Light), Group FL = prefabricated metal post (Filpost). The control group (C) had no cavities prepared. After thermal and load cycling, static load was applied at a 30° angle until fracture. Failure modes were categorized as restorable and non-restorable. Data were analyzed using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan tests (α = 0.05).

Results

The mean values of fracture loads (N) for all groups were: C (880±258); T (691±239); DT (865±269); and FL (388±167). Statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were observed for all groups except between groups C and DT. The Chi Square test showed failure modes in groups C and DT were mostly restorable. The most non-restorable fractures were observed in group FT.

Conclusion

Intact teeth and the teeth restored with composite and quartz fiber posts had a similar fracture resistance and the failure modes were mostly restorable. The lowest fracture resistance and the most nonrestorable failures were observed in conjunction with metal posts.

Clinical Significance

The results of this in vitro study suggest the use of a quartz fiber post used in conjunction with an MOD composite resin restoration improves fracture resistance in an endodontically treated premolar.

Citation

Hajizadeh H, Namazikhah MS, Moghaddas MJ, Ghavamnasiri M, Majidinia S. Effect of Posts on the Fracture Resistance of Load-cycled Endodontically-treated Premolars Restored with Direct Composite Resin. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 May; (10)3:010-017.


PDF Share
  1. Tooth structure and fracture strength of cavities. Braz Dent J 2007; 18(2):134-8.
  2. Fracture resistance of endodontically prepared teeth using various restorative materials. J Am Dent Assoc 1987; 115(1):57-60.
  3. Effect of postretained composite restorations and amount of coronal residual structure on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth. Am J Dent 2007; 20(4):269-74.
  4. Tooth fracture-a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod 1978; 4(11):341-5.
  5. In vitro comparison of cuspal fracture resistances of posterior teeth restored with various adhesive restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14(4):374-8.
  6. Fracture resistance of thermal cycled and endodontically treated premolars with adhesive restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 98(3):186-92.
  7. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16(1):64-9.
  8. Fracture resistance and stress distribution in endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with composite resin. J Prosthodont 2008; 17(2):114-9.
  9. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part I: Fracture resistance and fracture mode. J Prosthet Dent 2008; 99(1):30-7.
  10. Effect of restoration method on fracture resistance of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17(1):94-8.
  11. Pins and posts--why, when and how. Dent Clin North Am 1976; 20(2): 299-311.
  12. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992; 18(9):440-3.
  13. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87(4):431-7.
  14. Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87(4):438-45.
  15. Ex vivo fracture resistance of direct resin composite complete crowns with and without posts on maxillary premolars. Int Endod J 2005; 38(4):230-7.
  16. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent 2003; 28(2): 127-35.
  17. Influence of prefabricated post material on restored teeth: fracture strength and stress distribution. Oper Dent 2006; 31(1):47-54.
  18. Adaptation of adhesive posts and cores to dentin after fatigue testing. Int J Prosthodont 1997; 10(6):498-507.
  19. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18(1):34-9.
  20. A 5-year prospective clinical study on core restorations without covering crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18(1):40-1.
  21. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000;13(Spec No):9B-13B.
  22. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88(3):297-301.
  23. Randomized clinical comparison of endodontically treated teeth restored with amalgam or with fiber posts and resin composite: five-year results. Oper Dent 2005; 30(1):9-15.
  24. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983; 62(1):32-6.
  25. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int 2004; 35(8):657-67.
  26. Load fatigue of teeth restored by a dentin bonding agent and a posterior composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65(1):80-5.
  27. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26(5):372-8.
  28. Influence of design and mode of loading on the fracture strength of all-ceramic resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study in a dual-axis chewing simulator. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83(5):540-7.
  29. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005; 21(6):565-72.
  30. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15(6):559-63.
  31. Fracture susceptibility of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 1980; 6(5):560-5.
  32. Effect of different all-ceramic crown system on fracture resistance and failure pattern of endodontically treated maxillary premolars restored with and without glass fiber posts. J Endod 2007; 33(7):848-51.
  33. Effect of post-retained composite restoration of MOD preparations on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9(1):49-56.
  34. Fracture resistance of maxillary premolars restored with direct and indirect adhesive techniques. J Can Dent Assoc 2005; 71(8):585.
  35. , Thompson JY. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89(6):551-7.
  36. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with partial ceramic restorations and submitted to two different loading stresses. Oper Dent 2006; 31(2):204-11.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.