The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 3 ( May, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Inadequate Vertical Bone Dimension Managed by Bone-added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation (BAOSFE): A Literature Review and Case Report

Shilpa Kolhatkar, Leyvee Cabanilla, Monish Bhola

Citation Information : Kolhatkar S, Cabanilla L, Bhola M. Inadequate Vertical Bone Dimension Managed by Bone-added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation (BAOSFE): A Literature Review and Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (3):81-88.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-3-81

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-05-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this report is to provide a brief literature review of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation (BAOSFE) procedure and to present a case utilizing this technique.

Background

Implant placement in the posterior maxillary region is often compromised due to anatomic limitations. In clinical situations where there is inadequate vertical bone dimension, the BAOSFE technique can be employed to increase bone height and allow placement of implants with an appropriate length dimension.

Case Report

A case of a 60-year-old female with inadequate vertical bone dimension in the area of an extracted #13 is presented. The BAOSFE technique was performed which facilitated the placement of a 3.75 X 13 mm implant.

Summary

Anatomic limitations such as inadequate vertical bone dimension in the posterior maxillary region may result in placement of shorter implants. Sinus floor elevation (SFE) procedures using a crestal approach such as the BAOSFE, in certain selected cases, can effectively and predictably increase bone height.

Clinical Significance

The BAOSFE technique is an excellent procedure that can overcome limitations associated with the posterior maxillary region.

Citation

Kolhatkar S, Cabanilla L, Bhola M. Inadequate Vertical Bone Dimension Managed by Bone-added Osteotome Sinus Floor Elevation (BAOSFE): A Literature Review and Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 May; (10)3:081-088.


PDF Share
  1. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont 1998; 11:470-490.
  2. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997; 55:38-45.
  3. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:721-764.
  4. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998 Sept;11:408-420.
  5. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10:387-416.
  6. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. Periodontol 1991; 62:2-4.
  7. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993; 8:151-161.
  8. Contemporary Implant Dentistry. St. Louis, Mo: Mosby; 1993:469-485.
  9. The bony residual ridge in man. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 34:456-462.
  10. Implant survival and success rates in partially edentulous patients-Part I (in German). Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2003; 113:396-403.
  11. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8:161-172.
  12. Longitudinal report on hydroxyapatite-coated implants and advanced surgical techniques in a private practice. Compend Suppl 1993;S549-S553.
  13. Implant treatment in edentulous maxillae: a 5-year follow-up report on patients with different degrees of jaw resorption. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995; 10:303-311.
  14. Grafting of the maxillary sinus floor with autogenous marrow and bone. J Oral Surg. 1980; 38:613-616.
  15. Lectures presented at the Alabama implant Study Group, 1977;
  16. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30:207-229.
  17. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13:175-182.
  18. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13(Suppl):11-45.
  19. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152,154-156, 158.
  20. The modified osteotome technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001; 21:599-607.
  21. A four-year study examining the results of indirect sinus augmentation procedures. J Oral Implantol 1997; 23:117-127.
  22. Sinus elevation procedures in the resorbed posterior maxilla. Comparison of the crestal and lateral approaches. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:8-17.
  23. Report of the Sinus Consensus Conference of 1996. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13 Suppl:11-45.
  24. The bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation technique: multicenter retrospective report of consecutively treated patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999; 14:853-858.
  25. Augmentation of the posterior maxilla: a proposed hierarchy of treatment selection. J Periodontol 2003; 74:1682-91.
  26. Evaluation of maxillary sinus membrane response following elevation with the crestal osteotome technique in human cadavers. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 16:833-840.
  27. The endoscopically controlled osteotome sinus floor elevation: a preliminary prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17:557-566.
  28. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Den. 2000; 20:476-85.
  29. Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001; 21:475-485.
  30. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 different grafting materials for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. J Periodontol 2001; 72:1436-42.
  31. Endoscopic evaluation of the bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004; 33:189-194.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.