The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 6 ( November, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Effect of the Surface Roughness of Porcelain on the Adhesion of Oral Streptococcus mutans

Maan Ibrahim Al-Marzok, Haitham J. Al-Azzawi

Citation Information : Al-Marzok MI, Al-Azzawi HJ. The Effect of the Surface Roughness of Porcelain on the Adhesion of Oral Streptococcus mutans. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (6):17-24.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-6-17

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-11-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Dental plaque has a harmful influence on periodontal tissue. When a porcelain restoration is fabricated and refinishing of the glazed surface is inevitable, the increase in surface roughness facilitates the adhesion of plaque and its components. The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of surface roughness of glazed or polished porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans.

Methods and Materials

A total of 80 metalceramic specimens were prepared in the form of disks from two porcelain materials and divided into four groups according to the method of surface finishing. Surface roughness values (Ra-μm) for all specimens were recorded using a profilometer. S. mutans bacteria were isolated from saliva and all specimens were inoculated in test tubes containing a bacterial suspension allowing adhesion of the microorganisms to the specimens to occur. After incubation for 24 hours at 37°C, the specimens were transferred to a sterile saline solution and an inoculum of 0.1 ml from each selected dilution was spread on the selective medium, mitis salivarius bacitracin agar (MSB). Bacterial counts, expressed in colony forming unit (CFU) taking into consideration the dilution factor, were recorded.

Results

There was significant correlation (p<0.05) between surface roughness values (Ra-μm) and the amount of bacterial adhesion (CFU×103). The glazed surface was the smoothest and exhibited the least amount of bacterial adhesion.

Conclusions

A positive correlation between surface roughness and the amount of S. mutans adhesion was observed. The glazed porcelain surface was considered more biocompatible than other methods of porcelain surface finishing.

Clinical Significance

Chairside adjustments of the cervical contour or occlusal surface of porcelain restorations are sometimes necessary before or after cementation. Ideally, an uncemented restoration should be returned to the laboratory for reglazing after all adjustments have been completed.

It is important to evaluate various polishing procedures used for these adjusted surfaces to achieve a finished surface that as closely as possible approximates the quality of glazed porcelain.

Citation

Al-Marzok MI, Al-Azzawi HJ. The Effect of the Surface Roughness of Porcelain on the Adhesion of Oral Streptococcus mutans. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Nov; 10(6):017-024. Available from: http://www.thejcdp. com/journal/view/volume10-issue6-al-marzok.


PDF Share
  1. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2003; 30(3):265-9.
  2. Effect of surface roughness of porcelain on adhesion of bacteria and their synthesizing glucans. J Prosthet Dent. 2000; 83(6):664-7.
  3. Presence or absence of plaque on subgingival restorations. Scand J Dent Res. 1975; 83(1):193-201.
  4. Principles of biocompatibility for dental practitioners. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(2):203-9.
  5. Influence of titanium surface roughness on attachment of Streptococcus sanguis: an in vitro study. Implant Dent. 2005; 14(1):88-93.
  6. Introduction to dental materials. 2nd ed. England: Mosby; 2002.
  7. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 47(2):157-62.
  8. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 82(6):669-79.
  9. An evaluation of adjustment and postadjustment finishing techniques on the surface of porcelain-bonded-to-metal crowns. J Prosthet Dent. 1982; 48(4):388-95.
  10. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(5):486-90.
  11. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;75(1):18-32.
  12. Isolation and serotyping of Streptococcus mutans from teeth and feces of children. J Clin Microbiol. 1980; 11(4):314-8.
  13. Quantitative analysis of the adhesion of cariogenic streptococci to orthodontic metal brackets. Angle Orthod. 2005; 75(4):666-71.
  14. Human strains of mutans streptococci show different cariogenic potential in the hamster model. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1990; 5(4):177-80.
  15. Adhesion of periodontal bacteria to titanium, and titanium alloy powders. Clin Oral Implant Res. 1998; 9(2):67-72.
  16. Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent. 2004; 32(2):91-9.
  17. A selective medium for Streptococcus mutans. Arch Oral Biol. 1973; 18(11):1357-64.
  18. An in vivo study of the influence of the surface roughness of implants on the microbiology of supra- and subgingival plaque. J Dent Res. 1993; 72(9):1304-9.
  19. The effect of dental restorative materials on dental biofilm. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002; 110(1):48-53.
  20. The influence of surface free energy and surface roughness on early plaque formation. An in vivo study in man. J Clin Periodontol. 1990; 17(3):138-44.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.