The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 10 , ISSUE 6 ( November, 2009 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites

Ricardo Walter, Georgia V. Macedo, Gustavo M. S. Oliveira, Edward J. Swift

Citation Information : Walter R, Macedo GV, Oliveira GM, Swift EJ. Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009; 10 (6):25-32.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-10-6-25

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-11-2009

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2009; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To evaluate the microtensile bond strength (μTBS) of four adhesive systems to dentin, using self- and light-cured resin composites.

Methods and Materials

Crowns of human molars were separated from the roots, and the occlusal surfaces were ground to obtain flat superficial dentin. Three etch-and-rinse adhesives—All-Bond 2, One-Step Plus, and OptiBond Solo Plus—and one self-etching primer system, Peak SE, were evaluated. Each adhesive group was divided into two subgroups according to the type of resin composite used. A self-cured (Bisfil 2B) or light-cured (Filtek Supreme Plus) resin composite build-up was incrementally inserted to the dentin after each adhesive system was applied. The bonded specimens were stored in water for 24 h and sectioned into beams. Microtensile testing was done, and the data were subjected to ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test.

Results

The μTBS of All-Bond 2 and One- Step Plus was not affected by the type of resin composite used (p=0.3131 and p=0.1562, respectively). The μTBS of OptiBond Solo Plus was significantly reduced when used with selfcured resin composite (p<0.0001). Peak SE formed no bond of self-cured resin composite to dentin.

Conclusions

Some adhesives do not effectively bond self-cured resin composite to dentin.

Clinical Significance

Incompatibility between adhesives with low pH and certain self-cured resin composites can cause clinical debonding of restorations.

Citation

Walter R, Macedo GV, Oliveira GMS, Swift Jr EJ. Adhesive Bond Strengths Using Self- and Light-Cured Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2009 Nov; 10(6):025-032. Available from: http://www.thejcdp.com/journal/ view/volume10-issue6-walter.


PDF Share
  1. Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res. 1979; 58(4):1364-70.
  2. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14(5):451-6.
  3. Adverse surface interactions between one-bottle light-cured adhesives and chemical-cured composites. Dent Mater. 2001; 17(6):542-56.
  4. Effects of restorative and adhesive curing methods on dentin bond strengths. Am J Dent. 2001; 14(3):137-40.
  5. Incompatibility of self-etch adhesives with chemical/dual-cured composites: two-step vs one-step systems. Oper Dent. 2003; 28(6):747-55.
  6. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and chemically-cured or dual-cured composites. Part I. Single-step self-etching adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5(1):27-40.
  7. Short- and longterm bonding efficacy of a self-etching, onestep adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003; 5(1):41-5.
  8. Factors contributing to the incompatibility between simplified-step adhesives and self-cured or dual-cured composites. Part II. Single-bottle, total-etch adhesive. J Adhes Dent. 2003:5(2):91-105.
  9. Influence of pH of different adhesive systems on the polymerization of a chemically cured composite resin. Braz Dent J. 2005; 16(2):107-11.
  10. Conversion of one-step to twostep self-etch adhesives for improved efficacy and extended application. Am J Dent. 2005; 18(2):126-34.
  11. Dentin bonding of light- and self-curing resin composites using simplified total- and self-etch adhesives. Quintessence Int. 2007; 38(1):e27-35.
  12. Threeyear clinical effectiveness of four total-etch dentinal adhesive systems in cervical lesions. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27(11):775-84.
  13. A randomized, controlled trial evaluating the three-year clinical effectiveness of two etch & rinse adhesives in cervical lesions. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(4):376-85.
  14. Clinical evaluation of an all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions with different degrees of dentin sclerosis. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(4):370-8.
  15. Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent. 1997; 22(5):194-9.
  16. Mechanical disruption of dentin collagen fibrils during resin-dentin bond testing. J Adhes Dent. 2000; 2(3):175-92.
  17. The in vitro dentin bond strengths of two adhesive systems in class I cavities of human molars. J Adhes Dent. 2002; 4(1):31-9.
  18. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(2):110-24.
  19. Incompatibility of oxalate desensitizers with acidic, fluoridecontaining total-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005; 84(8):730-5.
  20. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007; 28(26):3757-85.
  21. Regional measurement of resin-dentin bonding as an array. J Dent Res. 1999; 78(2):699-705.
  22. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength— evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dent Mater. 1994; 10(4):236-40.
  23. Microtensile bond strength testing and failure analysis of two dentin adhesives. Dent Mater. 1998; 14(1):44-50.
  24. Effect of light-cure time of adhesive resin on the thickness of the oxygeninhibited layer and the microtensile bond strength to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006; 78(1):115-23.
  25. Importance of the hybrid layer on the bond strength of restorations subjected to cyclic loading. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2008; 84(1):291-7.
  26. Effect of curing mode on microtensile bond strength to dentin of two dual-cured adhesive systems in combination with resin luting cements for indirect restorations. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(1):37-44.
  27. Restorations with extensive dentin/ enamel-bonded ceramic coverage. A 5-year follow-up. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001; 109(4):222-9.
  28. Nanoleakage types and potential implications: evidence from unfilled and filled adhesives with the same resin composition. Am J Dent. 2004; 17(3):182-90.
  29. Microtensile bond strength of a filled vs unfilled adhesive to dentin using self-etch and total-etch technique. J Dent. 2006; 34(4): 283-91.
  30. Effect of fluoride iontophoresis on the microtensile bond strength between dentin and two adhesive systems. J Dent. 2008; 36(9):697-702.
  31. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent. 2004; 29(4):416-23.
  32. Microtensile bond strength of current dentin adhesives measured immediately and 24 hours after application. J Adhes Dent. 2005; 7(4):297-302.
  33. A statistical evaluation of microtensile bond strength methodology for dental adhesives. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(3):385-91.
  34. Bonding of dualcuring resin cements to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2006; 8(5):299-304.
  35. Microtensile dentin and enamel bond strengths of recent selfetching resins. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(1):89-95.
  36. Compatibility between self-etching adhesive and self-curing resin by addition of anion exchange resin. Dent Mater. 2005; 21(11):1044-50.
  37. The role of oxygen inhibition of a self-etch adhesive on self-cure resin composite bonding. Am J Dent. 2007; 20(3):157-60.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.