The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 2 ( March, 2010 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Microleakage Evaluation of Core Buildup Composite Resins with Total-Etch and Self-Etch Adhesive Systems

Horieh Moosavi, Saied Mostafa Moazzami, Shaghayegh Loh, Soheil Salari

Citation Information : Moosavi H, Moazzami SM, Loh S, Salari S. Microleakage Evaluation of Core Buildup Composite Resins with Total-Etch and Self-Etch Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010; 11 (2):9-16.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-11-2-9

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-03-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2010; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Core buildup composite resins with prefabricated posts are commonly used to restore endodontically treated teeth. This study compared the sealing ability of Core Max II and Panavia F2.0 cement with total-etch and self-etch adhesive systems.

Methods and Materials

Sixty recently extracted human second premolar teeth were chosen and their crowns were cut 3 mm above the CEJ. After preparing proximal boxes (4±1 mm buccolingually and 3 mm occlusogingivally dimensions) and finishing root canal therapy, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n=15): groups 1 and 2, Core Max II without and with total-etch adhesive; groups 3 and 4, Clearfil photocore composite, A2 shade, and Panavia F2.0 cement without and with self-etch adhesive respectively. The Dentatus posts (# 2 Long) were used in canals approximately 8 mm depth. According to manufacturer guidelines, pins were cemented and cores were restored. After keeping the specimens for 24 hours at 37°C and 100% humidity, they were thermally cycled for 500 cycles, sealed with nail varnish except 1 mm beyond the margins of restoration, and then immersed in a 0.5% fuschin basic for 24 hours. Samples were embedded in clear epoxy resin, sectioned mesiodistally, and observed at 20× magnification. The microleakage was assessed under stereomicroscope and the results were recorded in percentage of dye penetration to the whole path from the cavosurface margin of the proximal boxes to the end of the post. Analysis of variance and the Tukey test were used to evaluate the data (p=0.05).

Results

Groups 1 and 4 had the highest and the lowest values of microleakage respectively. Microleakage of Panavia F2.0 cement was lower than for Core Max II and for both cements using adhesive made the microleakage smaller than without it (p<0.05).

Conclusion

Application of adhesive using Core Max II cement and Panavia F2.0 cement is strongly recommended to decrease microleakage. Self-etch adhesive performed better than total-etch adhesive.

Clinical Significance

With regards to microleakage, the self-etching primer displayed better sealing than that obtained with the totaletching, two-step dental adhesive.

Citation

Moosavi H, Moazzami SM, Loh S, Salari S. Microleakage Evaluation of Core Buildup Composite Resins with Total-Etch and Self- Etch Adhesive Systems. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2010 March; 11(2):009-016. Available from: http://www.thejcdp.com/journal/view/ volume11-issue2-moosavi.


PDF Share
  1. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Weine FS, editor. Endodontic therapy. 5th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1997. p. 764.
  2. Microleakage of composite resin cores treated with various dentin bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 1991; 66(1):24-9.
  3. Coronal leakage: bacterial penetration through obturated canals following post preparation. J Am Dent Assoc. 1994; 125(10):1369-72.
  4. Improving the seal of amalgam cores with cemented dowels: a comparative in vitro radioactive tracer study. J Endod. 2001; 27(4):288-91.
  5. The dentin-root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1992; 67(4):458-67.
  6. A comparative study of fracture resistance between morphologic dowel and cores and a resin-reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int. 1996; 27(7):483-91.
  7. Factors determining post selection: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2003; 90(6):556-62.
  8. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy: a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994; 10(3):105-8.
  9. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated teeth restored using three root-reinforcement methods. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Jan 1;9(1):30-7.
  10. Mechanical properties of endodontic posts. J Oral Rehabil. 1997; 24(12):882-7.
  11. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth with different dowel systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(2):163-9.
  12. Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 79(3):264-9.
  13. Static and cyclic loading of fiber-reinforced dental resin. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(3):226-31.
  14. Microleakage in overflared root canals restored with different fiber reinforced dowels. Oper Dent. 2008; 33(1):96-105.
  15. Microleakage of composite resin restorations. Aust Dent J. 2008; 53(4):369-70.
  16. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in endodonticallytreated teeth restored with posts. Aust Endod J. 2003; 29(3):128-33.
  17. Microleakage of endodontically treated teeth restored with fiber posts and composite cores after cyclic loading: a confocal microscopic study. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 85(3):284-91.
  18. Microleakage and fracture patterns of teeth restored with different posts under dynamic loading. J Prosthet Dent. 2007; 98(4):270-6.
  19. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod. 2003; 29(2):125-31.
  20. Bonding of fibre-reinforced composite post to root canal dentin. J Dent. 2005; 33(7):533-9.
  21. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent. 2007; 32(2):179-84.
  22. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin. Dent Mater. 2007; 23(9):1129-35.
  23. Relationship between composite contraction stress and leakage in Class V cavities. Am J Dent. 2003; 16(4):239-43.
  24. Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness. Dent Mater. 1997;13(3):146-50.
  25. Influence of resin cement viscosity on microleakage of ceramic inlays. Dent Mater. 2001; 17(3):191-6.
  26. The effect of different adhesive types and curing methods on microleakage and the marginal adaptation of composite veneers. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009 1;10(3):18-26.
  27. Effect of 1-bottle lightcured adhesive acidity on microleakage of a self-cured composite. Oper Dent. 2006; 31(6):694-8.
  28. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration. Int Endod J. 1995; 28(1):12-8.
  29. Volumetric dimensional change of six direct core materials. Dent Mater. 2004; 20(4):345-51.
  30. Influence of luting agent on the microleakage of all-ceramic crowns. J Adhes Dent. 2007; 9(1):39-47.
  31. Effect of composite resin placement and use of an unfilled resin on the microleakage of two dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent. 1990; 3(4):153-6.
  32. Marginal integrity of ceramic inlays luted with a selfcuring resin system. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(4):270-6.
  33. In vitro microleakage of dentin adhesives. Int J Prosthodont. 1991; 4(3):213-8.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.