The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 11 , ISSUE 2 ( March, 2010 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effectiveness of Procedures for the Chemical-Mechanical Control of Dental Biofilm in Orthodontic Patients

Elton Gonçalves Zenóbio, Karla Magalhães Alves, Daniela Goursand, Roberval Almeida Cruz

Citation Information : Zenóbio EG, Alves KM, Goursand D, Cruz RA. Effectiveness of Procedures for the Chemical-Mechanical Control of Dental Biofilm in Orthodontic Patients. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010; 11 (2):41-48.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-11-2-41

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 00-03-2010

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2010; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Assess the effectiveness of chemicalmechanical control associated with orientation and motivation for the control of dental biofilm in orthodontic patients.

Methods and Materials

Thirty patients between 12 and 21 years of age wearing a fixed orthodontic appliance were divided into three groups. The control group (G1) received orientation regarding oral hygiene. The experimental groups (G2 and G3) received orientation regarding oral hygiene and diet as well as a hygiene kit and mouthwash; the mouthwash given to G2 was a placebo and that given to G3 contained essential oils (Listerine®).

Results

In the comparison between T0 and T60, vestibular gingivitis was worse in G1 (p<0.05), with no statistically significant differences regarding lingual gingivitis and biofilm. G2 and G3 exhibited a significant improvement in clinical conditions. In the comparison between groups, G3 had undergone a significantly greater improvement than the other groups.

Conclusion

The use of the commercial mouthwash, together with mechanical oral hygiene, orientation, and motivation, proved to be adequate conduct for the maintenance of oral health in orthodontic patients.

Clinical Significance

The present study contributes toward the maintenance of oral health in patients who wear a fixed orthodontic appliance through the prevention of dental biofilm buildup.

Citation

Alves KM, Goursand D, Zenobio EG, Cruz RA. Effectiveness of Procedures for the Chemical-Mechanical Control of Dental Biofilm in Orthodontic Patients. J Contemp Dent Pract [Internet]. 2010 March; 11(2):041-048. Available from: http://www.thejcdp.com/journal/view/ volume11-issue2-alves.


PDF Share
  1. Study of dental plaque in orthodontic patients. J Dent Res. 1970; 49(2):320-4.
  2. Avaliação comparativa do controle de placa bacteriana e da gengivite em pacientes sob tratamento ortodôntico, sem orientação, e com métodos de higiene supervisionados e de controle profissional. Ortodontia. 1988; 22(3):29-39.
  3. Acúmulo de placa bacteriana em pacientes portadores de colagem direta e anéis convencionais [Plaque accumulation in patients with direct bonding and conventional rings]. Rev Gaúch Odontol. 1984; 32(2):161-6.
  4. Estudo em pacientes portadores de aparelho ortodôntico, correlacionando os índices de placa e gengival, à escovação dental, e com bochechos de fluoreto de sódio, e com Cepacol® [Plaque and gingival index in orthodontic patients undergoing toothbrushing and mouthrinses with sodium fluoride and Cepacol]. Ortodontia. 1990; 23(3):35-47.
  5. Avaliação clínica de diferentes anti-sépticos bucais na redução do grau de gengivite em pacientes portadores de aparelho ortodôntico fixo [Clinical evaluation of different oral antiseptics in reducing the degree of gingivitis in fixed orthodontic appliance patients]. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortopedi Facial. 2004; 9(1):33-8.
  6. Procedimentos de motivação e higiene bucal em pacientes sob tratamento ortodôntico objetivando a saúde periodontal. Periodontia. 1996; 5(4):324-7.
  7. Controle químico e mecânico de placa em pacientes ortodônticos. Uma análise por grupo de dentes de acordo com o acessório ortodôntico empregado [Chemical and mechanical plaque control in orthodontic patients. An analysis by group of teeth according to the orthodontic accessory employed]. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortopedi Facial. 2003; 8(1):87-93.
  8. Aplicação de método de higiene bucal em pacientes portadores de aparelho ortodôntico. Rev Bras Odont. 1987; 44(4):2-8.
  9. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38(6):Suppl:610-6.
  10. Influência da aparatologia ortodôntica na colonização microbiana das superfícies dentárias [Influence of orthodontic apparatology in the microorganisms’ colonization on the teeth's surface]. Rev Dent Press Ortodon Ortoped Facial. 2001; 6(2):71-8.
  11. Clinical and microbiological effects of fixed orthodontic appliances on periodontal tissues in adolescents. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2007; 10(4):187-95.
  12. A profilaxia individual em pacientes com aparelhos fixos: recomendações para o consultório [Individual prophylaxis in patients with fixed appliances: recommendations for the practitioner]. Ortodontia. 1996; 29(2):4-15.
  13. Efeito do uso do gluconato de clorexidina e do cloreto de cetilpiridínio, em bochechos, como meio complementar da higiene bucal em pacientes sob tratamento ortodôntico [Efficacy of mouthrinses with chlorohexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride solutions, as complementary hygiene method in patients submitted to orthodontic treatment]. Ortodontia. 1997; 30(2):22-30.
  14. Avaliação dos efeitos clínicos da aplicação de gel de clorexidina em pacientes sob tratamento ortodôntico. Rev Periodontia. 1996; 5:300-5.
  15. Efficacy of Listerine, Meridol and chlorhexidine mouthrinses as supplements to regular tooth cleaning measures. J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19(3):202-7.
  16. Comparative antiplaque and antigingivitis effectiveness of a chlorhexidine and an essential oil mouthrinse: 6-month clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2004; 31(10):878-84.
  17. Comparative effects of 2 chemotherapeutic mouthrinses on the development of supragingival dental plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1990; 17(8):575-9.
  18. A clorexidina como coadjuvante no controle do biofilme dental durante o tratamento ortodôntico. Ortodontia. 2006; 39:166-9.
  19. The efficacy of an essential oil antiseptic mouthrinse vs. dental floss in controlling interproximal gingivitis: a comparative study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2003; 134(3):359-65.
  20. Comparative efficacy of an antiseptic mouthrinse and an antiplaque/antigingivitis dentifrice. A six-month clinical trial. J Am Dent Assoc. 2001; 132(5):670-5.
  21. Effect of an essential oil-containing antiseptic mouthrinse on plaque and salivary Streptococcus mutans levels. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27(3):157-61.
  22. Efficacy of Listerine antiseptic in inhibiting the development of plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1985; 12(8):697-704.
  23. Determination of the in situ bactericidal activity of an essential oil mouthrinse using a vital stain method. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27(4):256-61.
  24. Comparative antiplaque effectiveness of an essential oil and an amine fluoride/stannous fluoride mouthrinse. J Clin Periodontol. 1999; 26(3):164-8.
  25. The effect of a mouth rinse containing phenolic compounds on plaque formation and developing gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2005; 32(10):1083-8.
  26. Effectiveness of an essential oil mouthrinse in improving oral health in orthodontic patients. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(2):294-8.
  27. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Correlation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta Odontol Scand. 1964; 22:121-35.
  28. Experimental gingivitis in man. J Periodontol. 1965; 36: 177-87.
  29. Adjunctive benefit of an essential oil-containing mouthrinse in reducing plaque and gingivitis in patients who brush and floss regularly: a six-month study. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004; 135(4):496-504.
  30. Evidence-based control of plaque and gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30 Suppl 5:13-6.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.