Reliability of Two Color Selection Devices in Matching and Measuring Tooth Color
Carmen Llena, Esther Lozano, Jose Amengual, Leopoldo Forner
Citation Information :
Llena C, Lozano E, Amengual J, Forner L. Reliability of Two Color Selection Devices in Matching and Measuring Tooth Color. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12 (1):19-23.
The objective of this study was to investigate the intra and interdevice reliability of two tooth color measurement devices: EasyShade (ES) and SpectroShade Micro (SSM).
Materials and methods
Tooth color was measured in six maxillary and mandibular. L*, a* and b* values and shade matches to VITA Classical and Vitapan 3D-Master shade guide systems were determined for all teeth. ÄE was assessed. Paired t-test and correlation coefficient (ICC) were used.
Results
Intradevices no significant differences (p > 0.05) were found between L*, a*, b*. Interdevice L* and b* were significantly higher for ES (p < 0.05), while a* was significantly higher for SSM (p < 0.05). ÄE showed no significant interdevice difference (p > 0.05). Intradevices ICC values were higher for ES but not significant (p > 0.05).
Discussion
The null hypotheses that they present no differences in their color measuring within devices or shade systems is accepted, but the results allow to reject the null hypotheses that they present no differences in their color measuring or shade systems between devices.
Conclusion
Both EasyShade (ES) and SpectroShade Micro (SSM) show excellent repeatability and so they can be used in office to evaluate tooth color or to assess color changes after treatment.
Clinical significance
Dental color can be diagnosed using dental spectrophotometers, allowing to detect in an objective way therapeutic dental color changes.
How to cite this article
Llena C, Lozano E, Amengual J Forner L. Reliability of Two Color Selection Devices in Matching and Measuring Tooth Color. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12(1):19-23.
Evaluation of visual and instrument shade matching. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:642-48.
Intrarater repeatability of shade selections with two shade guides. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:50-53.
The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J 2005;199:43-49.
Shade selection performed by novice dental professionals and colorimeter. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:31-35.
Visual and spectrophotometric shade analysis of human teeth. J Dent Res 2002;81:578-82.
The influence of some different factors on the accuracy of shade selection. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:900-4.
Evaluating color match of different porcelain shade-matching systems. J Esthet Dent 2000;12:271-80.
Colorimetrytechnical report. (3rd ed). Vienna: Bureau central de la CIE 2004.
Visual and instrumental colorimetric assessments of small color differences on translucent dental porcelain. J Dent Res 1989;68:1760-64.
Assessment of appearance match by visual observation and clinical colorimetry. J Dent Res 1989;68: 819-22.
Clinical effect of different shade guide systems on the tooth shades of ceramicveneered restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:422-26.
Performance of five commercial available tooth color-measuring devices. J Prosthodont 2007;16:93-100.
Comparison of in vivo visual and computer-aided tooth shade determination. Clin Oral Investig 2005;9:244-50.
Precision of in vivo colorimetric assessments of teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:464-70.
Intraoral determination of the tolerance of dentists for perceptibility and acceptability of shade mismatch. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97:200-08.
Repeatability and interdevice reliability of two portable color selection devices in matching and measuring tooth color. J Prosthet Dent 2009;10:40-45.
Reliability and accuracy of four dental shade-matching devices. J Prosthet Dent 2009;10:193-99.
Validation and reliability of visual assessment with a shade guide for tooth-color classification. Oper dent 2008;33: 121-26.
Reliability and accuracy of crystal eye spectrophotometric system. Chin J Dent Res 2010;13:139-45.