The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2011 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative Study of Periapical Radiographic Techniques with Apex Locator for Endodontic Working Length Estimation: An ex vivo Study

Vaishali Parekh, Chirag Taluja

Citation Information : Parekh V, Taluja C. Comparative Study of Periapical Radiographic Techniques with Apex Locator for Endodontic Working Length Estimation: An ex vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12 (2):131-134.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1022

Published Online: 00-04-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background

Accurate assessment of working length determines the success and prognosis of an endodontic treatment outcome. Various methods are used in determining the working length.

Aim

Compare the measurements of the apex locator and radiographic technique to determine working length.

Methods

An ex vivo study was conducted on 20 patients having intact single straight root canal. Only premolars were taken in the study. After doing coronal flaring and irrigation, the radiographic length was determined with an aid of a k-type file and electronic length (EL-Root-ZX) 3rd generation apex locator. After extraction of all the premolars, stereomicroscope was further used to confirm and compare radiographic and electronic apex locator.

Results

A mean value of 0.5430 ± 0.5741 mm was observed among radiographic techniques. A mean value of 0.4240 ± 0.4587 mm was observed among apex locator techniques. Ttest revealed, no significant difference between the two techniques was observed (p = 0. 615). ‘Two tailed’ t-test revealed intragroup significance both techniques for determining the working length.

Conclusion

The distance of the apical foramen to the tip of the file: A mean value of 0.4240 ± 0.4587 mm with apex locator technique was observed. Working length of apex locator was more in comparison to radiographic technique. No significant difference between the two techniques was observed (p = 0. 615). Intragroup significance among both techniques for determining the working length was also observed. However, a further study incorporating a larger sample size and utilization of both techniques of working length determination on the same tooth has to be conducted.

Clinical significance

Combining the apex locator technique and radiographic technique for determination of working length would yield more accurate working length.

How to cite this article

Parekh V, Taluja C. Comparative Study of Periapical Radiographic Techniques with Apex Locator for Endodontic Working Length Estimation: An ex vivo Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(2):131-134.


PDF Share
  1. Histomorphometric study of the root apex of mandibular premolar teeth: An attempt to correlate working length measured with electronic and radiograph methods to various anatomic positions in the apical portion of the canal. J Endod April 2008; 34(4):408-12.
  2. Clinical accuracy of a new apex locator with an automatic compensation circuit. J Endod Oct 2002; 28(10):706-09.
  3. Accuracy of three electronic apex locators in anterior and posterior teeth: An ex vivo study. J Endod May 2011; 37(5): 684-87.
  4. Comparison of WL with radio and four electronic apex locators. Int Endod J June 2011;44(6):510-18.
  5. An ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, elements diagnostic unit and apex locator and propex. Int Endod J May 2006 39(5):408-14.
  6. Electronic apex locators. Department of oral rehabilitation, School of Dentistry, Unit of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Int Endod J 2004;37:425-37.
  7. Distance from file tip to the major apical foramen in relation to the numeric meter reading on the display of three different electronic apex locators. Int Endod J 2009;42:1065-70.
  8. An in vitro evaluation of performance of two electronic root canal length measurement devices during retreatment of different obturating Materials. J Endod 2010;36:1526-30.
  9. An in vivo comparison of WL determination of two frequency based electronic apex locators. Int Endodont Journal 2009;42:1026-31.
  10. An in vivo comparison of the root ZX 11, the apex NRG XFR and mini apex locators by using rotary nickel titanium files. J Endod 2009;35(7):962-65.
  11. Comparison of radiographic measurements obtained with conventional an indirect digital imaging during endontic treatment. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16(2):167-70.
  12. Comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod 2006;32:624-27.
  13. Clinical evaluation of five electronic root canal length measuring instruments. J Endod Sep 1990;16(9):446-49.
  14. In vitro evaluation of the reliability of the root ZX electronic apex locator. Int Endod J 1999;32(2): 120-23.
  15. The ability of the radiograph to determine the location of the apical foramen. Int Endod J 1991;24(1):28-35.
  16. Methodological considerations in the determination of working length. Int Endod J 2001;34(5):371-76.
  17. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy of several electronic apex locators. J Endod Nov 1995;21(11):572-75.
  18. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination II. In vivo evaluation. J Endod Oct 1995;21(10):516-20.
  19. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation. International Endod J 1995;28(3):149-53.
  20. Electronic length measurement using small and large files in enlarged canals. Int Endod J 1996;29(6):359-64.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.