The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2011 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Quantitative Digital Subtraction Radiography in the Assessment of External Apical Root Resorption Induced by Orthodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Study

Raghavendra Sunku, R Roopesh, Pavan Kancherla, Kiran Kumar Perumalla, Palla Venkata Yudhistar, V Sridhar Reddy

Citation Information : Sunku R, Roopesh R, Kancherla P, Perumalla KK, Yudhistar PV, Reddy VS. Quantitative Digital Subtraction Radiography in the Assessment of External Apical Root Resorption Induced by Orthodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12 (6):422-428.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1070

Published Online: 01-12-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The objective of this study was to evaluate density changes around the apices of teeth during orthodontic treatment by using digital subtraction radiography to measure the densities around six teeth (maxilla central incisors, lateral incisors, and canines) before and after orthodontic treatment in 36 patients and also assess treatment variables and their coorelation with root resorption.

Materials and methods

A total of 36 consecutive patient files were selected initially. The selected patients presented with a class I or II relationship and were treated with or without premolar extractions and fixed appliances. Some class II patients were treated additionally with extraoral forces or functional appliances. External apical root resorption (EARR) per tooth in millimeters was calculated and was also expressed as a percentage of the original root length. Image reconstruction and subtraction were performed using the software Regeemy Image Registration and Mosaicing (version 0.2.43-RCB, DPI-INPE, São José dos Campos, São Paulo, Brazil) by a single operator. A region of interest (ROI) was defined in the apical third of the root and density calibration was made in Image J® using enamel (gray value = 255) as reference in the same image. The mean gray values in the ROIs were reflective of the change in the density values between the two images.

Statistical analysis

The root resorption of the tooth and the factors of malocclusion were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA. An independent t-test was performed to compare the mean amount of resorption between male and female, between extraction and nonextraction cases. The density changes after orthodontic treatment were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signedrank test. In addition, the density changes in different teeth were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test. The cut-off for statistical significance was a p-value of 0.05. All the statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS (version 13.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Gender, the age at which treatment was started and Angle's classification was not statistically related with observed root resorption. The mean percentage density reduction as assessed by DSR was greatest in both central incisor: by 27.2 and 25.2% in the upper-right and upper-left central incisors, respectively, followed by the upper-right and upper-left canine teeth (23.5 and 21.0%) and then the upper-right and upper-left lateral incisors (19.1 and 17.4%).

Conclusion

Tooth extraction prior to treatment initiation and the duration of orthodontic treatment was positively correlated with the amount of root resorption. DSR is useful for evaluating density changes around teeth during orthodontic treatment. The density around the apices of teeth reduced significantly after the application of orthodontic forces during treatment.

Clinical significance

Assessment of density changes on treatment radiographs of patients undergoing orthodontic therapy may help in the monitoring of external apical root resorption during course of treatment.

How to cite this article

Sunku R, Roopesh R, Kancherla P, Perumalla KK, Yudhistar PV, Reddy VS. Quantitative Digital Subtraction Radiography in the Assessment of External Apical Root Resorption Induced by Orthodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(6):422-428.


PDF Share
  1. Root resorption after orthodontic treatment: Part 1. Literature review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:62-66.
  2. A radiographic study of posterior apical root resorption in orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994; 105:345-49.
  3. Assessment of apical root resorption using digital reconstruction. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27:25-29.
  4. Apical root resorption after lingual orthodontic therapy. J Orofac Orthop 2003;64:434-42.
  5. Are dental anomalies risk factors for apical root resorption in orthodontic patients? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:187-95.
  6. External apical root resorption following orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2000;70:227-32.
  7. Patterns of incisor root resorption before and after orthodontic correction in cases with anterior open bites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;101:112-19.
  8. Assessment of root resorption and root shape: Periapical vs panoramic films. Angle Orthod 2001;71:185-89.
  9. Apical root resorption in orthodontically treated subjects: Analysis of edgewise and light wire mechanics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1994;105:350-61.
  10. Evaluation of the risk of root resorption during orthodontic treatment: A study of upper incisors. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:30-38.
  11. Evaluation of root resorption in relation to two orthodontic treatment regimes. A clinical experimentalstudy. Eur J Orthod 1994;16:223-28.
  12. Quantitative digital subtraction radiography for the determination of small changes in bone thickness: An in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85:462-72.
  13. A comparison of apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment in endodontically treated and vital teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;97:130-34.
  14. A study of the relationship between incisor intrusion and root shortening. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1989;96:390-96.
  15. Quantitative determination of alveolar bone density using digital image analysis of microradiographs. Anatomischer Anzeiger 1990;170:171-79.
  16. A comparison of bone mineral density in the spine, hip and jaws of edentulous subjects. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007,18:496-500.
  17. Evaluation of bone height and bone density after tooth extraction: an experimental study in minipigs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104:e9-16.
  18. Experimental evaluation of bone quality measuring speed of sound in cadaver mandibles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;02:782-91.
  19. Accuracy of quantitative digital subtraction radiography for determining changes in calcium mass in mandibular bone: An in vitro study. J Periodontal Res Apr 1998;33(3):138-49.
  20. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008,105:231-38.
  21. Effect of object location on the density measurement and Hounsfield conversion in a NewTom 3G cone beam computed tomography unit. Dentomaxillo Facial Radiology 2008;37: 305-08.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.