The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 12 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2011 ) > List of Articles

CASE REPORT

An Effective Technique to Posterior Resin Composite Restorations

Adriana Cristina Zavanelli, Stefan Fiuza de Carvalho Dekon, Leonardo Viana Pereira, Marcelo Coelho Goiato, Cristina do Amparo Resende, Daniela Micheline dos Santos

Citation Information : Zavanelli AC, de Carvalho Dekon SF, Pereira LV, Goiato MC, Resende CD, Santos DM. An Effective Technique to Posterior Resin Composite Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011; 12 (6):506-510.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1085

Published Online: 01-12-2011

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2011; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study is to present a clinical case in which an occlusal matrix device was used in a patient who needed to restore a posterior tooth.

Material and methods

A direct duplicate occlusal appliance was used (biteperf) in a patient who needed an occlusal restoration in two posterior teeth.

Results

Using the matrix helps having fast and accurate reproduction of the original anatomical details of the occlusal surface. The final result surprised with the presented restoration in terms of esthetic quality, despite the simplicity of the technique.

Conclusion

Posterior teeth with initial lesions were confined to the occlusal surface of anatomically complex or fissured anatomy with or without signs of proximal caries wich are ideal candidates for this technique. The overlying enamel surface must be relatively intact; lesions of hidden or occult caries.

Clinical significance

The aesthetic and time-saving benefits of the occlusal device (biteperf) are immediately clear. The matrix allows the fast and accurate reproduction of the anatomic details of the original occlusal surface of the tooth. The professionals who lack an artistic penchant and marked manual ability will be able to carry out excellent posterior resin composite restorations.

How to cite this article

de Carvalho Dekon SF, Pereira LV, Zavanelli AC, Goiato MC, do Amparo Resende C, dos Santos DM. An Effective Technique to Posterior Resin Composite Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2011;12(6):506-510.


PDF Share
  1. Tooth-colored restorations. A text for selection, placement and finishing (7th ed). Cotati, California: Alto Books, 1985.
  2. Restorative resins: Hardness and strength vs quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res. 1982;90(6):484-89.
  3. Some factors influencing the depth of cure of visible light-activated composite resins. Australian Dent J 1990;35(3):213-18.
  4. Posterior resin composite restorations: A new technique. Quint Int 1996;27(11):733-38.
  5. Update on dental composite restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1994;125(6):687-701.
  6. Effect of particle shape and size distribution in a reinforced polymer. J Amer Dent Ass 1964;69:481-95.
  7. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 1955;34(6):849-53.
  8. Um nuevo sistema para la transferencia de la morfologia oclusal em restauraciones posteriores directas de resina de composite. J Esth Dent 1999;3(9):14-20.
  9. Trends in dental care among insured Americans: 1980-1995. J Am Dent Ass 1997;128(2): 171-78.
  10. Setting characteristics and porosity of a composite resin. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 1982;13(12):1345-51.
  11. Restauraciones con resinas compuestas. In: Echeverría Garcia JJ, Cuenca Sala E (Eds). El Manual de Odontología. Barcelona: Masson SA 1995:645-63.
  12. Evaluation of custom occlusal matrix technique for posterior light-cured composites. Oper Dent 1998;23(6):303-07.
  13. Resin restorations: Causes of porosities. Quint Int 1993;24:867-73.
  14. Intending the working time of light activated composite restorative materials. J Bras Dent 1986;160:162-65.
  15. Three composite finishing systems: A multisite in vitro evaluation. J Esth Dent 1992;4(6):181-85.
  16. Porosity in microfill restorative composite cured by visible light. Scand J Dent Res 1983;91(5): 396-405.
  17. Visible light-activated posterior composite resins: A comparison of surface hardness and uniformity of cure. Quint Int 1985;16(5):345-47.
  18. Occlusal index-assisted restitution of esthetic and functional anatomy in direct tooth-colored restorations. Quint Int 1996;27(2):81-88.
  19. Uma nova técnica de restauração com resina composta em dentes posteriores. RGO 1989;37(6):460-66.
  20. Técnica da matriz oclusal para restaurações com resinas compostas em dentes posteriores: caso clínico. Rev ABO Nac 2008;16(1):57-60.
  21. Skinner's Science of Dental Materials (Ed 8) Philadelphia: Saunders 1982.
  22. Comparison of quartz-tungsten-halogen, light-emitting diode and plasma arc curing lights. J Adhes Dent 2003;5(3):193-207.
  23. Class II direct composite resins restorations with Betaquartz glass-ceramic inserts. Quint Int 1993;24(11):793-97.
  24. Reprodução da anatomia oclusal utilizando-se matrizes pré-moldadas. JBA. 2002;2(8):286-91.
  25. Effect of light-tip distance on polymerization of resin composite. Int J Prosthodont 6(4):364-70.
  26. Clinically undetected occlusal dentine caries: A radiographic comparison. Caries Res 1992;26(4):305-09.
  27. The clinical diagnosis of occlusal caries: A problem. ASDC J Dent Child 1989;56(3):196-200.
  28. Sealing of occlusal hidden caries lesions: An alternative for curative treatment? ASDC J Dent Child 1992;59(4):263-68.
  29. Factors affecting cure of visible light activated composites. Int Dent J 1985;35(3):218-25.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.