The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 1 ( January-February, 2012 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effect of Three Different Core Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Deciduous Mandibular Second Molars: An in vitro Study

Sachin C Gugwad, Rahul Lodaya, Chetan Bhat, Preetam Shah

Citation Information : Gugwad SC, Lodaya R, Bhat C, Shah P. Effect of Three Different Core Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Deciduous Mandibular Second Molars: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (1):66-70.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1097

Published Online: 01-02-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

How to cite this article

Shah P, Gugwad SC, Bhat C, Lodaya R. Effect of Three Different Core Materials on the Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Deciduous Mandibular Second Molars: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(1):66-70.


PDF Share
  1. Are endodontically treated teeth more brittle? Endodont 1992;18(7):332-35.
  2. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with GIC and acid etch composite resin. Journal of Endodontics 1991;17(6);251.
  3. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root filled teeth. Comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J 2006;39:136-42.
  4. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 1994;27:281-84.
  5. Glass ionomer restrorative cements-implications of setting reaction. Journal of Operative Dentistry 1982;12:134-41.
  6. In vitro fracture resistance of root filled teeth using new generation dentine bonding adhesives. Int Endod J 2003;36:770-73.
  7. Resistance of bonded composite restorations to fracture of endodontically treated teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2004;5:51-58.
  8. Fracture resistance of reinforced glass ionomer as core build up material. Journal of Operative Dentistry 1990;15:23-26.
  9. Effect of restorative procedures on the strength of endodontically treated molars. Journal of Endodontics 1994;20(10):479.
  10. Fracture resistance of the buccal cusps of root filled maxillary premolar teeth restored with various techniques. Int Endod J 2007;40:161-68.
  11. Effect of bonded restorations on the fracture resistance of endodontically filled teeth. Int Endod J 2006;39:900-04.
  12. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: An evidence based literature review. University of Toronto, Faculty of Dentistry–Community Dentistry 2008;1-21.
  13. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part 11: Strain measurement and stress distribution. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:114-22.
  14. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:225-32.
  15. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dental Traumatol 2008;24:214-19.
  16. A comparison of fracture resistance of core materials using different types of posts. Quintessence International 2007;38(8):511-16.
  17. Influence of timing of postspace preparation and presence/abscence of intracanal barrier on coronal bacterial microleakage: An ex vivo study. Indian J Somatol 2011;2(2):102-07.
  18. Interface gap at enamel margins. J Den Mat 1988;4:122-28.
  19. Comparison of fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth using different coronal restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent Oct-Dec 2009;12(4):154-59.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.