The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2012 ) > List of Articles

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The Interference of the Cleaning Procedure of Root Walls with Two Different Solvents on the Adhesion of Fiberglass Intraradicular Posts

Monica Fatima Gomes, Sergio Brossi Botta, Adriana Bona Matos, Narciso Garone-Netto

Citation Information : Gomes MF, Botta SB, Matos AB, Garone-Netto N. The Interference of the Cleaning Procedure of Root Walls with Two Different Solvents on the Adhesion of Fiberglass Intraradicular Posts. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (3):275-279.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1136

Published Online: 01-06-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

This study was undertaken to examine the effect of root canal (RT) sealers content and the cleaning procedure of RT walls on bond strength (BS) of a fiber reinforced composite (FRC) post cemented with resin-based or zinc phosphate cement.

Materials and methods

Forty bovine roots were divided into 2 groups (n = 20) and obturated with gutta-percha points plus Sealer 26 sealer or gutta-percha points plus N-Rickert sealer. In each group, half (n = 10) of intracanal walls was cleaned with ethanol and the other half with sulfuric ether. In each of these subgroups, half of intracanal posts (n = 5) were cemented with Bistite resin-based cement and half with zinc phosphate cement. Specimens were submitted to pull-out test and tensile force until post dislodgement. The maximum forces required for post removal was expressed in MPa, means were submitted to statistical analysis (Analysis of Variance Test, α = 0.05).

Results

Fiber reinforced composite cemented with zinc phosphate were significantly more retentive than those cemented with Bistite (p < 0.05). Regarding the influence of eugenol-based sealer on post retention, there was a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05) only between groups cemented with Bistite, in which canals filled with N-Rickert + gutta-percha showed lower BS than canals filled with Sealer 26 + gutta-percha.

Conclusion

Despite endodontic cement used, higher pull-out bond strength were obtained when posts were cemented with zinc phosphate.

Clinical significance

The importance of ethanol or sulphuric ether application to properly replace water from intraradicular dentine still requires further investigations, especially to clarify if this technique may reduce the effect of aging and improve the stability of the bond, when used to cement fiber posts into the root canal.

How to cite this article

Gomes MF, Botta SB, Matos AB, Garone- Netto N. The Interference of the Cleaning Procedure of Root Walls with Two Different Solvents on the Adhesion of Fiberglass Intraradicular Posts. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3):275-279.


PDF Share
  1. Factors affecting retention of post systems: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999 Apr;81(4):380-85.
  2. In vitro study of fracture resistance of bovine roots using different intraradicular post systems. Quintessence Int 2004 Sep;35(8):612-16.
  3. Long-life physical property preservation and postendodontic rehabilitation with the composipost. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1996(20):S50-56.
  4. Clinical evaluation of fiberreinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000 May;13(Spec No):15B-18B.
  5. Factors determining post selection: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent, 2003 Dec;90(6):556-62.
  6. Effect of eugenol and eugenol cements on cured composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 1983 Aug;50(2):211-15.
  7. Effect of eugenol and noneugenol containing temporary cement on permanent cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin. Dent Mater J 2003 Dec;22(4):592-99.
  8. Effect of eugenol-containing endodontic sealer on retention of prefabricated posts luted with adhesive composite resin cement. Quintessence Int 1992 Dec;23(12):839-44.
  9. Effect of zinc oxide-eugenol on shear bond strengths of selected core/cement combinations. J Prosthet Dent 1986 Feb;55(2):206-08.
  10. Effect of solvents on bonding to root canal dentin. J Endod 2004 Aug;30(8):589-92.
  11. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978 Apr;39(4):400-05.
  12. Effect of length and diameter of tapered posts on the retention. J Oral Rehabil 2002 Jan;29(1):28-34.
  13. Comparison of retentive properties of four post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1992 Aug;68(2):264-68.
  14. Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy, glass fiber, and zirconia. J Adhes Dent Summer 2003;5(2):153-62.
  15. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements. J Prosthet Dent 1998 May;79(5):520-25.
  16. Effect of dowel space preparation and composite cement thickness on retention of a prefabricated dowel. J Prosthodont 2002 Mar;11(1):19-24.
  17. Effects of three canal sealers on bond strength of a fiber post. J Endod 2010 Mar;36(3):497-501.
  18. Retention of radicular posts varying the application technique of the adhesive system and luting agent. Braz Oral Res 2006 Oct-Dec;20(4):347-52.
  19. Fundamentos de protese fixa. 4 ed. São Paulo: Quintessence; 2007;472.
  20. Effects of eugenol and noneugenol endodontic sealer cements on post retention. J Endod 1998 Aug;24(8):564-67.
  21. Effect of eugenol-based endodontic sealer on the adhesion of intraradicular posts cemented after different periods. J Appl Oral Sci 2009 Nov-Dec;17(6):579-83.
  22. Effect of three root canal sealers on the retentive strength of endodontic posts luted with a resin cement. Int Endod J 2002 Apr;35(4):372-78.
  23. Phillips materials dentarios (11 Ed). Anusavice KJ. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier 2005;764.
  24. The retention of dental posts. J Dent 1982 June;10(2):154-65.
  25. Leakage and sealer penetration in smear-free dentin after a final rinse with 95% ethanol. J Endod 2006 Aug;32(8):785-88.
  26. Dental adhesion review: Aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24(1):90-101.
  27. Application of hydrophobic resin adhesives to acid-etched dentin with an alternative wet bonding technique. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008 Jan;84(1):19-29.
  28. Bonding BisGMA to dentin—a proof of concept for hydrophobic dentin bonding. J Dent Res 2007 Nov;86(11):1034-39.
  29. From dry bonding to water-wet bonding to ethanol-wet bonding. A review of the interactions between dentin matrix and solvated resins using a macromodel of the hybrid layer. Am J Dent 2007 Feb;20(1):7-20.
  30. Effects of resin hydrophilicity on dentin bond strength. J Dent Res 2006 Nov;85(11):1016-21.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.