The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Comparative Evaluation of the Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth using Different Root Canal Sealers: An in vitro Study

MB Prashanth, Pradeep N Tavane, BM Annapoorna, NT Prashanth, BS Deepak, Ajay Nagpal, Munish Singla, Ashmita Singh

Citation Information : Prashanth M, Tavane PN, Annapoorna B, Prashanth N, Deepak B, Nagpal A, Singla M, Singh A. A Comparative Evaluation of the Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth using Different Root Canal Sealers: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (3):351-355.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1150

License: CC BY-NC 3.0

Published Online: 01-06-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate the vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth obturated with – Tubli-Seal EWT/Gutta-percha, AH Plus/Gutta-percha, Epiphany SE sealer/Epiphany point.

Study design

Sixty-five single rooted premolars were decoronated and root length was 14 mm for each specimen. Fifty five teeth were enlarged up to ISO size 40 master apical file with stainless steel K-files using standardized preparation and remaining ten teeth were served as negative control. Then teeth were randomly assigned into different groups depending on sealer used for obturation as follows:

Group 1

Negative control—no instrumentation was performed.

Group 2

Positive control—gutta-percha with out the use of any sealer.

Group 3

Experimental group—gutta-percha and Tubli-Seal EWT root canal sealer.

Group 4

Experimental group—gutta-percha and AH Plus.

Group 5

Experimental group—epiphany SE sealer and epiphany points.

After 72 hours, the specimens were embedded in autopolymerizing resin leaving 7 mm of each root exposed and were subjected to fracture testing under universal testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm per minute until the root fractured. Results were statistically analyzed using one-way ANOVA and independent t-test.

Results

Showed that Epiphany SE sealer/Epiphany points showed highest mean fracture resistance and Tubli-Seal EWT group showed the least fracture resistance of all the materials tested. There was no statistically significant difference among experimental groups.

Conclusion

Epiphany SE sealer/Epiphany points demonstrated highest fracture resistance values than the other materials tested and intact tooth had highest resistance against vertical root fracture.

Clinical significance

Epiphany SE sealer/Epiphany points may be one of the materials of choice in the endodontic treatment of teeth.

How to cite this article

Nagpal A, Annapoorna BM, Prashanth MB, Prashanth NT, Singla M, Deepak BS, Singh A, Tavane PN. A Comparative Evaluation of the Vertical Root Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth using Different Root Canal Sealers: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(3):351-355.


PDF Share
  1. Determination of moisture content of vital and pulpless teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34:661-70.
  2. Further investigation of spreader loads required to cause vertical root fracture during lateral condensation. J Endod 1987:13:277-84.
  3. Strength of roots before and after endodontic treatment and restoration. J Endod 1992:18:440-43.
  4. J Endod (2006);32:553-55.
  5. Prevalence of vertical root fracture in endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 1999:32:283-86.
  6. Load and strain during lateral condensation and vertical root fracture. J Endod 1999;25(2):99-104.
  7. Pathways of pulp. St Louis: Mosby 2002;8:358-99.
  8. Principles and practice of endodontics. WB Saunders 2002;3:239-67.
  9. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. J Endod 2002;28:684-88.
  10. A comparison of root fracture resistance using two root canal sealers. Int Endod J 1999:32:376-80.
  11. Evaluation of root reinforcement of endodontically treated teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000;90:360-64.
  12. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. JADA 2004;135:646-52.
  13. Influence of resin-based adhesive root canal fillings on the resistance to fracture of endodontically treated roots: An in vitro preliminary study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103:274-79.
  14. Influence of different endodontic filling materials on root fracture susceptibility. Journal of Dentistry 2008:36:69-73.
  15. The influence of the smear layer removal upon dental tubule penetration by endodontic filling materials. J Endod 1987:13:369-74.
  16. Adhesion of sealer cements to dentin with and without the smear layer. J Endod 1991:17:15-20.
  17. Adhesion of glass ionomer cement to human radicular dentine. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995;11(5):214-19.
  18. Effects of root canal sealers on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2002;28(3):217-19.
  19. Resistance to fracture of roots filled with three different techniques. Int Endod J 2007:40:31-35.
  20. Dimensional change following setting of root canal sealer materials. Dent Mater: 2001;17:512-19.
  21. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root dentin using a push-out test design: J Endodon 2007;33:856-58.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.