The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative Analysis for Selection of Resin Luting Cements Based on Filler Content: An in vitro Study

Mandava Ramesh Babu, Vajapeyayajula RaviKiran, V Vinod, Devabhaktuni Saraswathi, Venugopal N Rao

Citation Information : Babu MR, RaviKiran V, Vinod V, Saraswathi D, Rao VN. Comparative Analysis for Selection of Resin Luting Cements Based on Filler Content: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (4):481-486.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1173

Published Online: 01-08-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


Abstract

Context

Resin luting of all-ceramic restorations results in increased performance; however, the strengthening mechanism and the role of the mechanical properties of the resin are not fully understood.

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of filler content on the flexural properties of resin luting agents and thereby selecting an appropriate resin luting cement.

Materials and methods

Three esthetic resin luting agents studied were Calibra (Dentsply); RelyX ARC and Panavia F. Ten beam-shaped specimen (L × W × H: 30 × 8 × 2 mm) were made for each of the material tests carried out. The specimens were stored in distilled water for 24 hours at 37°C. The specimens were then tested for flexural strength (MPa) and flexural modulus (GPa) using the three-point bending method on a universal material testing machine at a cross head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data obtained were statistically analyzed using ANOVA followed by post-hoc - Tukey's test with p < 0.05 for statistical significance.

Results

Increase in mean strength related to an associated increase in the elastic modulus which in turn was related to the filler loading of the resin luting cements.

Conclusion

Strength and performance of resin-cemented allceramic restoration can be enhanced by the use of a resin luting cement having increased filler content.

Clinical implications

Resin-composite cements may be most suitable for adhesively bonded restorations, where margins are placed on supragingival enamel, and where ultimate strength and energy absorption are paramount. The selection criteria for a resin cement depends on its flexural strength. To a great extent, the flexural strength is dependent on the filler loading of the resin luting cement.

Key message

Fracture of brittle all-ceramic restoration can be prevented by using resin luting cement with higher filler loading. In other words, any resin luting cement with higher filler content has an improved performance in terms of clinical function and durability.

How to cite this article

Babu MR, RaviKiran V, Vinod V, Saraswathi D, Rao VN. Comparative Analysis for Selection of Resin Luting Cements Based on Filler Content: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(4):481-486.


PDF Share
  1. Crack formation of all-ceramic crowns dependent on different core build-up and luting materials. J Dent 1999;27:175-81.
  2. Resin elasticity and strengthening of all-ceramic restoration. J Dent Res 2007;86(6):519-23.
  3. Evaluation of dental restorative composites containing polyhedral oligomeric silsesquioxane methacrylate. Dent Mater 2005;21:520-29.
  4. Resin composite properties and energy density of light cure. J Dent Res 2005;84:659-62.
  5. Effects of five thermal stressing regimens on the flexural and bond strengths of a hybrid resin composite. Oper Dent 2005;30:297-303.
  6. Dentistry— polymer based filling, restorative and luting materials. ISO 4049:2000. Available at: http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prodsservices/ISOstore/store.html. Accessed April 13, 2005.
  7. Materials in dentistry: Principles and applications. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, (2nd ed) 2001;32.
  8. Physical and adhesive properties of newly developed adhesive resin cement. Trans Dent Mater Group Chapter, Am Assoc Dent Res 1992;215.
  9. Scotchbond resin cement product information. St Paul (MN): 3M; 1995.
  10. The effect of using layered specimens for determination of the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements. J Dent Res 1992;71:1871-74.
  11. Light-cured lining materials: A laboratory study. Dent Mater 1994;10:196-202.
  12. A method for determining mechanical resonance frequencies and for calculating elastic moduli from these frequencies. Am Soc Test Mater Proc 1961;1221-28.
  13. C 1259-94 standard test method for dynamic young's modulus, shear modulus and poisson's ratio for advanced ceramics by impulse excitation of vibration. Philadelphia: American Society for Testing and Materials 1994.
  14. Dental materials: Properties and selection. Chicago: Quintessence, (2nd ed);1997.
  15. The temperature of cement specimens and its influence on measured strength. Dent Mater 1985;1:71-73.
  16. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures invitro and invivo: Analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;76(6):1253-58.
  17. Numerical simulation of crack formation in all-ceramic dental bridge. Key Eng Mat 2006;312:293-98.
  18. Seven to 10 years clinical evaluation of etched porcelain veneers. J Dent Res 1995;74:176.
  19. Bonded vs non-bonded DICOR crowns: Four year report. J Dent Res 1992;71:321.
  20. Failure rates of full coverage restorative materials. J Dent Res 1991;70:540.
  21. Fatigue of dental ceramics in a simulated oral environment. J Dent Res 1986;65(7):993-97.
  22. A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. Dent Mater 1992;8:131-36.
  23. Helvey porcelain laminate veneer insertion using a heated composite technique. Inside Dentistry 2009 Apr;5(4):22-26.
  24. Flexural strength and microstructure of alkali-reistant glass fibre reinforced calcium aluminate-phenol resin composite. Advances in Cement Research 2011;23(1):11-15.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.