The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles


Comparison of Opal Self-Ligating Brackets with Manually Ligating Brackets

Ashwin Deshpande, N Srinivas, K Kiran Kumar, Sagar Mapare

Citation Information : Deshpande A, Srinivas N, Kumar KK, Mapare S. Comparison of Opal Self-Ligating Brackets with Manually Ligating Brackets. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (4):494-503.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1175

Published Online: 01-12-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


How to cite this article

Deshpande A, Srinivas N, Kumar KK, Mapare S. Comparison of Opal Self-Ligating Brackets with Manually Ligating Brackets. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13(4):494-503.

PDF Share
  1. Retention capacity of esthetic bracket bases. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:596-603.
  2. Contemporary fixed appliances. Contemporary orthodontics (3rd ed). St. Louis, Missouri 2000:385-416.
  3. Ex vivo shear bond strength of fiberglass reinforced aesthetic brackets. Br J Orthod 1995;22:325-30.
  4. Bond strength of orthodontic directbonding cement plastic bracket systems in vitro. Am J Orthod 1983;83:124-30.
  5. Self-ligation in the year 2000. J Clin Orthod 2000;34:74-81.
  6. Round Table: The Edgelok bracket. J Clin Orthod 1972;6:613-23.
  7. The SPEED system: A report on the development of a new edgewise appliance. Am J Orthod 1980;78:243-65.
  8. Time: A new orthodontic philosophy. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:44-53.
  9. The Damon Low-Friction Bracket: A Biologically Compatible Straight-Wire System. J Clin Orthod 1998;35:670-80.
  10. The rationale, evolution and clinical application of the self-ligating bracket. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:52-61.
  11. Fracture of polycarbonate edgewise brackets: A clinical and SEM study. Br J Orthod 1987;14(3):191-95.
  12. Fracture of polycarbonate brackets: A related photoelastic stress analysis. Br J Orthod 1988;15:87-92.
  13. Timesavings with self-ligating brackets. J Clin Orthod 1990;24:29-31.
  14. Shear peel bond strengths of esthetic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:215-19.
  15. A comparative study of conventional ligation and self-ligation bracket systems. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1994;106:472-80.
  16. In vitro peel/shear bond strength evaluation of orthodontic bracket base design. J Dent 1997;25:271-78.
  17. In vitro comparison of the retention capacity of new aesthetic brackets. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:71-77.
  18. Shear bond strengths of orthodontic plastic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:438-43.
  19. The clinical efficiency of self-ligated brackets. J Clin Orthod 2001;35(5):304-08.
  20. Treatment time, outcome, and patient satisfaction comparisons of Damon and conventional brackets. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:228-34.
  21. Self-ligating brackets and treatment efficiency. Clin Orthod Res 2001;4:220-27.
  22. Shear bond strengths of plastic brackets with a mechanical base. Angle Orthod 2002;72:141-45.
  23. Comparison of initial shear bond strengths of plastic and metal brackets. Eur J Orthod 2004;26:531-34.
  24. Comparative assessment of the roughness, hardness and wear resistance of esthetic bracket materials. Dent Mater 2005;21:890-94.
  25. The development of the PAR Index (Peer assessment rating): Reliability and validity. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:125-40.
  26. The PAR index (peer assessment rating): Methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:180-87.
  27. Load-deformation characteristics of polycarbonate orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod 1975;67:24-33.
  28. The clinical use of Activa self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1996;109:319-28.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.