The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A Comparative Evaluation of DIAGNOdent and Caries Detector Dye in Detection of Residual Caries in Prepared Cavities

Majid Akbari, Farzaneh Ahrari, Marzieh Jafari

Citation Information : Akbari M, Ahrari F, Jafari M. A Comparative Evaluation of DIAGNOdent and Caries Detector Dye in Detection of Residual Caries in Prepared Cavities. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (4):515-520.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1178

Published Online: 01-08-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The objective of this study was to determine the association between DIAGNOdent laser and caries detector dye in detection of the remaining caries in restorative cavities.

Materials and methods

The sample consisted of 100 cavities prepared in patients referring to the Department of Restorative Dentistry of Mashhad Dental School. After confirming caries absence by tactile examination, the presence of any residual caries was determined by a laser fluorescence (LF) device (DIAGNOdent Pen) and then by caries detector dye. The data were analyzed through McNemar test.

Results

When the cut off value was considered as ≥13, both DIAGNOdent Pen and caries detector dye found 54 cavities as without caries and 12 cavities as carious. There were 32 teeth diagnosed as decayed only by the dye and two cases that were diagnosed as having residual caries only by the DIAGNOdent. The McNemar test revealed a significant difference in the diagnosis of residual caries between the two methods (p < 0.05), as well as significant differences between each method and tactile examination (p < 0.05). When the cut off value was set at ≥25, no significant difference was found between laser fluorescence and tactile examination in residual caries detection (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Both DIAGNOdent Pen and caries detector dye can be considered as adjuncts for detecting residual caries in prepared cavities. However, the use of laser fluorescence device can provide results that are more consistent with tactile examination, while relying on caries detector dye may result in excessive removal of tooth tissue, and thus increase the risk of pulpal exposure.

Clinical significance

Incomparision with caries detector dye, Residual caries detection by DIAGNOdent Pen is more consistent with tactile examination.

How to cite this article

Akbari M, Ahrari F, Jafari M. A Comparative Evaluation of DIAGNOdent and Caries Detector Dye in Detection of Residual Caries in Prepared Cavities. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(4):515-520.


PDF Share
  1. Criteria for caries removal at the enamel-dentine junction: A clinical and microbiological study. Br Dent J 1996;180(8):287-91.
  2. Dentine caries excavation: A review of current clinical techniques. Br Dent J 2000;188(9):476-82.
  3. Differentiation of two layers of carious dentin by staining. Bull Tokyo Med Dent Univ 1972;19(1):83-92.
  4. Removal of dentin by fuchsin staining. J Dent Res 1976;55(4):678-83.
  5. Caries-detector dyes—how accurate and useful are they? J Can Dent Assoc 2000;66(4):195-98.
  6. The specificity of caries detector dyes in cavity preparation. Br Dent J 1994;176(11):417-21.
  7. The use of a caries detector dye during cavity preparation: A microbiological assessment. Br Dent J 1993;174(7):245-48.
  8. Caries detection methods based on changes in optical properties between healthy and carious tissue. Int J Dent 2010:270729, EPub 2010 Mar 28.
  9. DIAGNOdent: An optical method for caries detection. J Dent Res 2004;83 Spec No C:C80-83.
  10. Clinical diagnosis of fissure caries with conventional and laser-induced fluorescence techniques. Lasers Med Sci 2010;25(3):355-62.
  11. A comparative evaluation of DIAGNOdent with visual and radiography for detection of occlusal caries: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2009;20(3):326-31.
  12. Comparison of QLF and DIAGNOdent for quantification of smooth surface caries. Caries Res 2001;35(1):21-26.
  13. A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(10):1413-26.
  14. Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions in permanent molars. J Dent 2008;36(12):1033-40.
  15. In vitro study of caries detection through sound dentin using a laser fluorescence device, DIAGNOdent. Eur J Oral Sci 2003;111(1):7-11.
  16. A comparison of root caries diagnosis based on visual-tactile criteria and DIAGNOdent in vivo. J Dent 2009;37(7):509-13.
  17. Validity and reliability of laser-induced fluorescence measurements on carious root surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 2009;43(5):397-404.
  18. Evaluation of several techniques for the detection of secondary caries adjacent to amalgam restorations. Caries Res 2004;38(4):350-56.
  19. Initial in vitro evaluation of DIAGNOdent for detecting secondary carious lesions associated with resin composite restorations. Quintessence Int 2003;34(2):109-16.
  20. Effect of a dental cream containing amorphous cream phosphate complexes on white spot lesion regression assessed by laser fluorescence. Oral Health Prev Dent 2007;5(3):229-33.
  21. Effect of topical applications of a chlorhexidine/thymol-containing varnish on fissure caries assessed by laser fluorescence. Acta Odontol Scand 2004;62(6):339-42.
  22. Clinical evaluation of bonded amalgam restorations in endodontically treated premolar teeth: A 1 year evaluation. J Contemp Dent Pract 2010;11(5):9-16.
  23. Does incomplete caries removal reduce strength of restored teeth? J Dent Res 2010;89(11):1270-75.
  24. Influence of residual caries and cervical gaps on the survival rate of class II glass ionomer restorations. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2006;7(2):85-91.
  25. Indirect pulp therapy and stepwise excavation. Pediatr Dent 2008;30(3):225-29.
  26. An in vitro study of affected dentin as a risk factor for the development of secondary caries. Caries Res 2006;40(1):47-51.
  27. Clinical performance of a laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109(1):14-19.
  28. Residual caries detection using visible fluorescence. Caries Res 2002;36(5):315-19.
  29. Evaluation of laser fluorescence for differentiating caries dye-stainable versus caries dye-unstainable dentin in carious lesions. Am J Dent 2005;18(6):351-54.
  30. An in vitro comparison of different diagnostic methods in detection of residual dentinal caries. Int J Dent 2010;2010:864935.
  31. The in vitro performance of laser fluorescence and caries-detector dye for detecting residual carious dentin during tooth preparation. Quintessence Int 2005;36(6):417-22.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.