The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Effect of Composite Fiber Insertion along with Lowshrinking Composite Resin on Cuspal Deflection of Root-filled Maxillary Premolars

Siavash Savadi Oskoee, Amir Ahmad Ajami, Parnian Alizadeh Oskoee, Elmira Jafari Navimipour, Gazale Ahmadi Zonuz, Mahmood Bahari, Fatemeh Pournaghiazar

Citation Information : Oskoee SS, Ajami AA, Oskoee PA, Navimipour EJ, Zonuz GA, Bahari M, Pournaghiazar F. The Effect of Composite Fiber Insertion along with Lowshrinking Composite Resin on Cuspal Deflection of Root-filled Maxillary Premolars. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (5):595-601.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1193

Published Online: 01-10-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of three methods of composite fiber placement along with siloranebased composite resin on cuspal deflection and fracture strength of root-filled maxillary premolars.

Materials and methods

Mesio-occluso-distal cavities were prepared in 60 extracted premolars subsequent to endodontic treatment. The remaining thickness of buccal and lingual walls at height of contour was 2.5 ± 0.2 mm and the gingival cavosurface margin was 1.5 mm coronal to cementoenamel junction. Subsequent to measurement of primary intercuspal distances, the teeth were randomly divided into four groups. In group 1, the cavities were only filled with Filtek Silorane composite resin. In the other three groups, preimpregnated glass fibers were placed at gingival, middle and occlusal thirds respectively, and the cavities were restored similar to the group 1. Cuspal deflection was recorded in micrometer using a stereomicroscope. Fracture strength of the samples was measured in Newton subsequent to thermocycling. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests at a significance level of p < 0.05.

Results

The highest cuspal deflection was recorded in the group 1, and the difference between group 1 and other groups was significant (p < 0.001). Fracture resistance in group 4 was significantly higher than that in other groups (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

In restoring root-filled premolars with siloranebased composite resins, cuspal deflection decreased with the use of preimpregnated glass fibers.

Clinical significance

Using preimpregnated glass fibers along with silorane-based composite resin may lead to better results in cuspal deflection and fracture resistance of endodonticallytreated maxillary premolars.

How to cite this article

Oskoee SS, Oskoee PA, Navimipour EJ, Ajami AA, Zonuz GA, Bahari M, Pournaghiazar F. The Effect of Composite Fiber Insertion along with Low-shrinking Composite Resin on Cuspal Deflection of Root-filled Maxillary Premolars. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(5):595-601.


PDF Share
  1. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: Comparison of two restoration techniques. Int Endod J 2006;39:136-42.
  2. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JB, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, (Eds). Fundamentals of operative dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence 2006;570-87.
  3. The effect of fiber insertion on fracture resistance of root filled molar teeth with MOD preparations restored with composite. Int Endod J 2005;38:73-80.
  4. In vitro fracture resistance of endodontically-treated maxillary premolars. Oper Dent 2007;32:510-14.
  5. In vitro cuspal deflection and microleakage of maxillary premolars restored with novel low-shrink dental composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:324-35.
  6. Polymerization stress, shrinkage and elastic modulus of current low-shrinkage restorative composites. Dent Mater 2010;26:1144-50.
  7. Cuspal movement and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based filling materials cured using a soft-start polymerisation protocol. Dent Mater 2007;23:637-43.
  8. Influence of cavity dimension and restoration methods on the cusp deflection of premolars in composite restoration. Dent Mater 2007;23:288-95.
  9. In vitro measurement of cuspal strain and displacement in composite restored teeth. J Dent 1997;25:331-37.
  10. Effect of liners on cusp deflection and gap formation in composite restorations. Oper Dent 2001;26:406-11.
  11. Cuspal deflection and microleakage in premolar teeth restored with resin-based composites with and without an intermediary flowable layer. J Dent 2007;35:482-89.
  12. Cuspal deflection, strain and microleakage of endodontically treated premolar teeth restored with direct resin composites. J Dent 2009;37:724-30.
  13. Macro-, micro-and nano-mechanical investigations on silorane and methacrylate-based composites. Dent Mater 2009;25:810-19.
  14. The effect of three composite fiber insertion techniques on fracture resistance of root-filled teeth. J Endod 2009;35:413-16.
  15. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater 2010;26:215-22.
  16. Siloranes in dental composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:68-74.
  17. Determination of polymerization shrinkage stress by means of a photoelastic investigation. Dent Mater 2004;20:313-21.
  18. Physical properties of a new siloranebased restorative system. Dent Mater 2010;26:337-44.
  19. Bonding to enamel and dentin. In: Summitt JB, Robbins JB, Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS (Eds). Fundamentals of operative dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence 2006;184-260.
  20. Silorane-based dental composite: Behavior and abilities. Dent Mater 2006;25:445-54.
  21. A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. Quintessence Int 1999;30:163-68.
  22. Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on the flexural strength of different denture base resins. Quintessence Int 2002;33:457-63.
  23. Polymethylmethacrylate reinforced with carbon fibres. Br Dent J 1971;130:29-30.
  24. The effect of carbon graphite fiber reinforcement on the strength of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resins. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:816-20.
  25. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: An investigation of transverse strength. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:543-47.
  26. Ultra-high-modulus polyethylene ribbon as reinforcement for denture polymethyl methacrylate: A short communication. Dent Mater 1997;13:381-82.
  27. The effect of plasmatreated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of polymethyl methacrylate. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:94-96.
  28. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:947-55.
  29. Continuous and short fiber reinforced composite in root post-core system of severely damaged incisors. Open Dent J 2009;18:36-41.
  30. Influence of triaxial braid denier on ribbon-based fiber reinforced dental composites. Dent Mater 2007;23:969-76.
  31. In vitro fracture resistance of fiber reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:565-72.
  32. The effect of different fiber concentrations on the surface roughness of provisional crown and fixed partial denture resin. Eur J Dent 2008;2:185-90.
  33. Polymerization shrinkage and contraction stress of dental resin composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:1150-57.
  34. The influence of shortterm water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composites. Biomaterials 2002;23:2221-29.
  35. Acoustic emission analysis of fiber-reinforced composite in flexural testing. Dent Mater 2004;20:305-12.
  36. An in vitro investigation of the effects of glass inserts on the effective composite resin polymerization shrinkage. J Dent Res 1989;68:1234-37.
  37. Effect of fiber position and oriantation on fracture load of fiber-reinforced composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:947-55.
  38. Effect of a new restoration technique on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Traumatol 2008;24:214-19.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.