The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Cantilever and Resin Bonded Cantilever Fixed Partial Dentures: A Comparative Study

GC Ramesh, BG Prasanna, K Kesava Reddy, TV Shree Harsha

Citation Information : Ramesh G, Prasanna B, Reddy KK, Harsha TS. Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Cantilever and Resin Bonded Cantilever Fixed Partial Dentures: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (6):793-798.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1231

Published Online: 01-04-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction

Ever since the introduction of the minimal preparation fixed partial dentures, the major concern of the clinicians has been its longevity.

Aims and objective

The objective of the present study was to compare the clinical performance of resin bonded cantilever bridges with conventional cantilever bridges for a period of 1 year and to evaluate the periodontal changes of abutment teeth using radio visio graphy.

Materials and methods

Fourteen patients with missing first or second premolar were selected for the study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, conventional cantilever group and resin bonded cantilever group.

Results

The results were analyzed using Student's t test and Mann-Whitney U test. The clinical success rate for both the groups was 100%. The amount of bone loss at 6 months for conventional group was 0.11 mm and for resin bonded bridge group was 0.10 mm. The amount of bone loss at 1 year for conventional cantilever group was 0.14 mm and for resin bonded fixed partial denture group was 0.16 mm. There was no statistical difference between both the groups.

The results showed that the resin bonded cantilever bridges can be used for the treatment of missing posterior tooth.

How to cite this article

Prasanna BG, Reddy KK, Harsha TVS, Ramesh GC. Clinical Evaluation of Conventional Cantilever and Resin Bonded Cantilever Fixed Partial Dentures: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(6):793-798.


PDF Share
  1. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics (3rd ed), Harcourt (India) Private Limited, Mosby Inc, St Louis, Missourie 2001;673-96.
  2. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics (3rd ed), Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co Inc 1997;537-63.
  3. A literature review of two-unit cantilevered FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:281-84.
  4. The single unit, single retainer, cantilever resin-bonded bridge. British Dent J 1996;181:373-79.
  5. Two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures-a retrospective, preliminary clinical investigation. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:25-28.
  6. A prospective study of cantilever resinbonded bridges: An initial report. Australian Dent J 2000;45:31-36.
  7. The cantilever fixed partial denture: A 10-year follow-up. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:542-45.
  8. Longevity of two-unit cantilevered resin-bonded fixed partial dentures. Am J Dent 2002;15:295-99.
  9. Design principles for cantilevered resin bonded fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2000;31:613-19.
  10. Success with the cantilever fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:537-39.
  11. A three-unit posterior resinbonded fixed partial denture seated 1 year after extraction of second molar: A clinical report. Int Chin J Dent 2009:9;15-18.
  12. Longevity of resin-bonded fixed partial dentures: Better than conventional fixed restorations? In: Degrange M, Roulet F (Eds). Minimally invasive restorations with bonding. Chicago: Quintessence 1997:185-99.
  13. Two-unit cantilevered resinbonded fixed partial dentures as a substitute for a prosthodonticorthodontic treatment plan-A 5 years case report. J Can Dent Assoc 2012:78:67.
  14. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clinical Oral Implant Research 2008:19(2):131-41.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.