The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 13 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2012 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparison of Orthopantomography and Computed Tomography Image for Assessing the Relationship between Impacted Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Canal

Uma Shankar, KR Hari, T Praveen Kumar Reddy, Shravan Kumar Katakam, Deepti Janga

Citation Information : Shankar U, Hari K, Reddy TP, Katakam SK, Janga D. Comparison of Orthopantomography and Computed Tomography Image for Assessing the Relationship between Impacted Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Canal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012; 13 (6):819-823.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1235

Published Online: 01-12-2012

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background

Permanent mandibular third molar are most commonly impacted teeth. In planning the surgical removal of mandibular third molar, correct diagnosis requires not only their precise spatial location, but also a thorough and accurate assessment of the intimate relationship with adjacent anatomical structures. Various imaging modalities have been used for localizing the mandibular third molar but not satisfactorily.

Aim

This prospective study of 30 patients with 42 impacted mandibular third molars was carried out with the aim of finding evidence for justifying the use of computed tomography and orthopantomography as a diagnostic modality, prior to surgical intervention of impacted mandibular third molar.

Materials and methods

Subjective evaluation of the CT and OPG images by two observed had shown that there was significant difference between the CT and OPG for radiographic visibility of mandibular canal in relation to third molar.

Results

Data analysis was done with Chi-square test (χ2) and z-test to find the significant difference between the two radiographic modalities OPG and CT in localizing special relationship of impacted mandibular third molar. The comparison of OPG and CT showed z-value >1.5 in darkening of roots (1.98), deflection of root (2.00) interruption of z-value = 0 in narrowing of canal and dark, bifid apexes. Also it showed p-value <0.05 in all the radiographic signs except narrowing of mandibular canal and and dark and bifid apexes.

Conclusion

The spiral CT image provides a unique opportunity to determine the exact position of impacted mandibular third molar and their relationship to adjacent structure in all three planes.

Clinical significance

Computed tomography is highly instrumental in depicting the relationship of mandibular third molar with inferior alveolar nerve canal before treatment and accurate appraisal of the several aspects can be made regarding prognosis.

How to cite this article

Katakam SK, Shankar U, Thakur D, Reddy TPK, Hari KR, Janga D. Comparison of Orthopantomography and Computed Tomography Image for Assessing the Relationship between Impacted Mandibular Third Molar and Mandibular Canal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012;13(6):819-823.


PDF Share
  1. Dental computed tomography imaging: A look ata the jaw. Radiology 2001 May;219(2):334-45.
  2. Development of compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dento maxillofac Radiol 1999;28:245-48.
  3. Clinical usefulness of twodimensional reformatted and three-dimensionally rendered computed tomographic images. Literature review and a survey of surgeon openion. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995 Apr;53(4):375-86.
  4. Impacted teeth. Citation oral and maxillofacial surgery. WB Saunders Company 1975;5:250.
  5. Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal. Clin Oral Investig 2008;12:291-302.
  6. The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990 2010 Nov 1;15(6):e886-90.
  7. Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and Impacted mandibular third molars: Classification and modified technique for removal. Dent Dig 1933;39:330-38.
  8. Principles of exodontia as applied to the impacted mandibular third molar. St Louis (MO): American Medical Book Co 1926.
  9. Radiation dose reduction in direct digital panoramic radiography. Eur J Radiol 2009;71:42-48.
  10. Correlation of radiographic signs, inferior dental nerve exposure, and deficit in third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;69:1873-79.
  11. Diagnostic accuracy of panoramic radiography in determining relationship between inferior alveolar nerve and mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010;68:74-82.
  12. Radiographic risk factors for inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:417-21.
  13. Surgical extraction of impacted inferior third molars at risk for inferior alveolar nerve injury. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:2003-07.
  14. Evaluation of the indication for surgical extraction of third molars according to the oral surgeon and the primary care dentist. Experience in the Master of Oral Surgery and Implantology at Barcelona University Dental School. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008 Aug 1;13(8):E499-504.
  15. Inferior alveolar nerve damage after lower third molar surgical extraction: a prospective study of 1117 surgical extractions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001;92:377-83.
  16. Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. J Am Dent Assoc 2004 Mar;135(3):312-18.
  17. Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003 Nov;96(5):639-46.
  18. Comparative efficacy of spiral computed tomography and orthopantomography in preoperative detection of relation of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle to the impacted mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009 Jan;67(1):58-66.
  19. Incidence and evolution of inferior alveolar nerve lesions following lower third molar extraction. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005 Mar;99(3):259-64.
  20. Preoperative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006 Jan;35(1):30-35.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.