The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Removal Efficiency of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing from the Root Canal without Chemically Active Adjuvant

Lara Maalouf, Alfred Naaman

Citation Information : Maalouf L, Naaman A. Removal Efficiency of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing from the Root Canal without Chemically Active Adjuvant. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (2):188-192.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1298

Published Online: 01-04-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Compare the efficiency in removing two calcium hydroxide [Ca(OH)2] preparations from root canal and apical third using single use syringe, ultrasonics and RinsEndo® with saline solution.

Materials and methods

One hundred and eighty human singlerooted teeth were instrumented using ProTaper® rotary system, divided into two groups according to Ca(OH)2 filling. A: Powder mixed with water, B: Pulpdent®. Each group was divided into three subgroups for the irrigation: A1, B1: Single use syringe; A2, B2: Ultrasonics; A3, B3: RinsEndo®.

Teeth were split longitudinally, photographed and imported into Adobe Photoshop. The percentage ratios of Ca(OH)2 remaining in the canal and in the apical third were calculated. Data were statistically analyzed using ‘ANOVA two-way’ and ‘univariate tests’.

Results

(a) Remnants of medicament were found in all teeth, (b) no statistically significant difference in the elimination of both Ca(OH)2 from the entire canal (p = 0.436), however, mixed powder was better eliminated from the apical third (p = 0.005), (c) no statistically significant difference among the irrigation techniques in the whole canal (p = 0.608), though, RinsEndo® and ultrasonics were the most effective in cleaning the apical third (p = 0.032) when mixed powder was used.

Conclusion

None of the techniques removed completely Ca(OH)2 from the canal. In the apical third, RinsEndo® and ultrasonics were the most effective when mixed powder was used.

Clinical significance

Ca(OH)2, the most commonly used intracanal dressing, should be completely eliminated before the obturation to assure a good endodontic sealing. Based on the results of this study, RinsEndo® and ultrasonics were the most effective in removal of Ca(OH)2 especially the powder mixed with water presentation.

How to cite this article

Maalouf L, Zogheib C, Naaman A. Removal Efficiency of Calcium Hydroxide Dressing from the Root Canal without Chemically Active Adjuvant. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):188-192.


PDF Share
  1. Effect of calcium hydroxide as an intracanal dressing on apical leakage. Int Endod J 1998;31:173-77.
  2. The effectiveness of syringe irrigation and ultrasonics to remove debris from simulated irregularities within prepared root canal walls. Int Endod J 2004;37:672-78.
  3. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in the removal of artificially placed dentin debris in plastic blocks. Int Endod J 2005;38:593-96.
  4. Interaction of calcium hydroxide with zinc oxide-eugenol type sealers: A potential clinical problem. J Endod 1997;23:43-51.
  5. Influence of calcium hydroxide intracanal medication on apical seal. Int Endod J 2002;35:623-28.
  6. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with Ca (OH)2. J Endod 1999;25:431-33.
  7. A comparison of canal preparation in straight and curved root canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971;32:271-75.
  8. Removal efficacy of various calcium hydroxide/chlorhexidine medicaments from the root canal. Int Endod J 2006;39:55-56.
  9. Penetration depth of a dye marker into dentine using a novel hydrodynamic system (RinsEndo®). Int Endod J 2007;40:644-52.
  10. A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Endod 2006;32:563-65.
  11. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007;40:415-26.
  12. Efficacy of syringe irrigation, RinsEndo and passive ultrasonic irrigation in removing debris from irregularities in root canals with different apical sizes. Int Endod J 2010;43(7):581-89.
  13. Chapters 1 and 2. The acoustic bubble. New York: Academic Press: 1994.
  14. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide dressing from the root canal. J Endod 1999;25:85-88.
  15. Cleaning qualities of RinsEndo®: An in vitro study. Eur Cell Mater 2007;13(1):27.
  16. Scanning electron microscopy analysis of RinsEndo system and conventional irrigation for debris removal. Braz Dent J 2010;21(4):305-09.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.