The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Volume  25 (2024)
Volume  24 (2023)
Volume  23 (2022)
Volume  22 (2021)
Volume  21 (2020)
Volume  20 (2019)
Volume  19 (2018)
Volume  18 (2017)
Volume  17 (2016)
Volume  16 (2015)
Volume  15 (2014)
Volume  14 (2013)
Volume  13 (2012)
Volume  12 (2011)
Volume  11 (2010)
Volume  10 (2009)
Volume  9 (2008)
Volume  8 (2007)
Volume  7 (2006)
Volume  6 (2005)
Volume  5 (2004)
Volume  4 (2003)
Volume  3 (2002)
Volume  2 (2001)
Volume  1 (1999)
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

A New Solvent-free One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive: Bond Strength to Tooth Structures

Maryam Khoroushi, Farinaz Shirban, Mohammadreza Shirban

Citation Information : Khoroushi M, Shirban F, Shirban M. A New Solvent-free One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive: Bond Strength to Tooth Structures. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (2):269-274.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1312

Published Online: 01-08-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).


Abstract

Introduction

In recent years some new solvent-free dental adhesives have been marketed. This study evaluated bonding effectiveness of a new one-step solvent-free self-etch adhesive in comparison with a common two-step self-etch adhesive used as gold standard.

Materials and methods

Flat enamel and dentin surfaces were prepared on 60 incisors using silicon carbide papers. Clearfil SE Bond (CSEB) and Bond 1SF (B1SF) adhesives were applied on enamel/dentin surfaces in four groups (n = 15): (1) Enamel surface and CSEB, (2) dentin surface and CSEB, (3) enamel surface and B1SF, (4) dentin surface and B1SF. Composite resin buildups were carried out using Z100 composite resin. All the specimens were stored for 24 hours at 37¢XC and 100% relative humidity. After 500 rounds of thermocycling, shear bond strength (SBS) test was performed using a universal testing machine at 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and a post hoc Tukey test (α = 0.05). In each experimental group, two additional specimens were prepared for scanning electron microscopy evaluation.

Results

Significant differences were observed between the study groups (p < 0.001). The highest enamel/dentin bond strengths were recorded in group 1 (CSEB) (p < 0.001). The SBS of the two-step self-etch adhesive to enamel and dentin was significantly higher than that of the one-step self-etch adhesive (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between enamel and dentin SBS with B1SF (p = 0.559).

Conclusion

Within the limitations of the present study, when bonded to enamel and dentin the solvent-free adhesive B1SF underperforms as compared to CSEB as the control gold standard.

How to cite this article

Shirban F, Khoroushi M, Shirban M. A New Solvent-free One-Step Self-Etch Adhesive: Bond Strength to Tooth Structures. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):269-274.

PDF Share
  1. One-year clinical evaluation of an ethanol-based and a solvent-free dentin adhesive. Am J Dent 2004 Dec;17(6):451-56.
  2. A three-year clinical evaluation of two-bottle versus one-bottle dentin adhesives. J Am Dent Assoc 2005 Mar;136(3):311-22.
  3. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to burcut dentin. Oper Dent 2010 Jan-Feb;35(1):94-104.
  4. Microtensile bond strengths of single-step self-etch adhesive systems to bovine dentin. J Oral Sci 2007 Sep;49(3):183-89.
  5. Bonding effectiveness of two contemporary self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Dent 2009 Nov;37(11):872-83.
  6. Dentin treatment effects on the bonding performance of selfadhesive resin cements. Eur J Oral Sci 2010 Feb;118(1):80-86.
  7. Enamel microhardness and bond strengths of self-etching primer adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci 2010 Apr;118(2):191-96.
  8. Monomer-solvent phase separation in onestep self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res 2005 Feb;84(2):183-88.
  9. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007 Sep;28(26):3757-85.
  10. Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives. J Dent Res 2007 Aug;86(8):739-44.
  11. Influence of the chemical structure of functional monomers on their adhesive performance. J Dent Res 2008 Aug;87(8):757-61.
  12. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2009;11(3):175-90.
  13. The role of HEMA in onestep self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater 2008 Oct;24(10):1412-19.
  14. One-day bonding effectiveness of new selfetch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Oper Dent 2005 Jan-Feb;30(1):39-49.
  15. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater 2005 Feb;21(2):110-24.
  16. A comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2009 Jul;12(3):101-04.
  17. Effect of repeated use on dentin bond strength of two adhesive systems: All-in-one and one-bottle. Indian J Dent Res 2009 Apr-Jun;20(2):180-84.
  18. Microtensile bond strengths of one-and two-step self-etch adhesives to bur-cut enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2003 Dec;16(6):414-20.
  19. Micromorphological evaluation of posterior composite restorations—a 10-year report. J Oral Rehab 2004;31(10):991-1000.
  20. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent 2004;32(5):379-83.
  21. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res 1994;73(6):1212-20.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.