The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login



Volume / Issue

Online First

Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2013 ) > List of Articles


Interdisciplinary Treatment of an Adolescent with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

Sai Prakash Adusumilli, Bhaskar Mummidi, KV Baburam Reddy, CH Hanumantha Rao, BH V Rama Krishnam Raju

Citation Information : Adusumilli SP, Mummidi B, Reddy KB, Rao CH, Raju BV. Interdisciplinary Treatment of an Adolescent with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (2):332-338.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1323

Published Online: 01-08-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; The Author(s).



The present case report describes the importance of interdisciplinary approach and gives an understanding on management of an adolescent with unilateral cleft lip and palate.


Failure of fusion between medial nasal process and maxillary process or between the palatal process leads to the formation of clefts. Clefts are result of genetic or environmental factors or a combination of both. Common dental problems associated with clefts includes anterior and posterior crossbites, hypodontia, malformation and abnormal eruption pattern.

Case report

A girl, aged 15 years reported with a chief complaint of unesthetic appearance of her maxillary anterior teeth. She had unilateral cleft lip and palate and had received cheiloplasty and palatoplasty when she was in young age and rhinoplasty when she was 14 years of age. At pretreatment evaluation, she had concave profile with maxillary arch constriction and oroantral fistula and mesially tipped maxillary left canine.


This patient's treatment was unconventional, but it was successful in significantly improving her masticatory function and smile, along with favorable dental and facial results. Generalized esthetics and function were significantly improved in this patient without orthognathic surgery, and treatment results were stable 3 years after the appliance removal.

Clinical considerations, sequencing of treatment phases as shown in this case report can be utilized while treating an adolescent with cleft lip and palate.

Clinical significance

If the skeletal discrepancy is mild and esthetic concerns are minimal, dental compensation by orthodontic treatment alone might be recommended. The cephalometric analysis and prediction tracings provide further information for deciding whether a patient can be treated by orthodontics alone, or by orthodontics and an orthognathic surgical procedure.

A change in axial inclination of the teeth can camouflage the skeletal relationship adequately. However, one should be cautious in a growing patient, because he or she might outgrow the dental correction so that ultimately skeletal surgery would be indicated.

How to cite this article

Adusumilli SP, Sudhakar P, Mummidi B, Reddy KVB, Rao CHH, Raju BHVRK. Interdisciplinary Treatment of an Adolescent with Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(2):332-338.

PDF Share
  1. State of the art in cleft palate orofacial growth and dentistry. A historical perspective. Am J Orthod 1978;74:564-76.
  2. Dental anomalies in cleft lip and cleft palate patients. Angle Orthod 1964;34:119-23.
  3. Factors related to tooth number, eruption time, and tooth position in cleft palate individuals. ASDC J Dent Child 1970;37:303-06.
  4. Symmetry and combinations of hypodontia in non-cleft and cleft palate children. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:1-8.
  5. A study of the frequency of congenital missing and supernumerary teeth in cleft lip and palate patients. Korean J Orthod 1993;23:319-26.
  6. The effects of cleft on mesiodistal dimension of permanent teeth in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients. Korean J Orthod 1995;25:447-51.
  7. Abnormalities of the maxillary incisors in children with cleft lip and palate. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62:412-17.
  8. Distribution patterns of primary and permanent dentition in children with unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:154-60.
  9. The reconstruction of anterior residual bone defects in patients with cleft lip, alveolus and palate. A review. J Maxillofac Surg 1985;13:197-208.
  10. Orthodontic considerations applied to craniofacial dysmorphology. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:141-45.
  11. Membranous vs endochondral bone autografts: implications for craniofacial reconstruction. Surg Forum 1979;30:521-23.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.