The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 3 ( May-June, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Shaping Potential of Manual NiTi K-File and Rotary ProTaper and Analyzing the Final Outcome of Shaped Canals using CT

Anil Dhingra, Surbhi Kakar

Citation Information : Dhingra A, Kakar S. Shaping Potential of Manual NiTi K-File and Rotary ProTaper and Analyzing the Final Outcome of Shaped Canals using CT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (3):451-455.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1343

Published Online: 01-06-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

To assess and compare the shaping potential of manual NiTi K-files and Rotary ProTaper instruments in narrow canals using CT.

Objective

To assess the shaping potential of manual NiTi K-files and Rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT and determining different variables, like

• Working time

• Change in volume

• Change in cross-sectional area.

Materials and methods

From a pool of fifty freshly extracted permanent maxillary molars (1st and 2nd), 30 were selected with curvatures (20 to 40°) (Schneider 1971). Tissue fragments and calcified debries were removed from the teeth by scaling. The teeth were then stored in normal saline until used.

All the mesiobuccal canals were scanned by CT to obtain preinstrumented images. Teeth were scaled and stored in normal saline. This study was divided in two groups with 15 samples each.

Group I (ProTaper Rotary)

Canals were instrumented with Protaper Rotary instruments using crown down technique according to manufacturer's instructions.

Group II (NiTi K-file)

Were instrumented by NiTi K-files using step back technique with a quarter turn/pull motion.

Evaluations of working time

Comparative evaluations of working time was done for both the experimental groups.

CT analysis and measurements

The samples were analyzed and evaluated for:

• Postinstrumentation change in volume.

• Postinstrumentation change in cross-sections area.

Result

From the observations and statistical analysis carried out in this study, it was found that:

There was a statistically significant difference between all the parameters judged for the present study that is:

1. Instrumentation with ProTaper Rotary system took significantly less time than instrumentation with manual NiTi K-file.

2. Change in the canal volume following instrumentation with ProTaper Rotary was significantly greater than that produced by manual NITi K-file.

3. a. Change in cross-section area at 2 and 3 mm from the apex was significantly greater with manual NiTi K-file as compared to ProTaper Rotary.

b. Change in cross sections at 4.5, 6 and 7.5 mm from the apex with ProTaper Rotary was significantly greater than that produced by manual NITi K-file.

Conclusion

This clearly establishes that there is a drastic difference in the shaping ability of manual and Rotary NiTi instruments used with step back and crown down technique respectively with the rotary instrumentation being faster and producing greater changes in the canal anatomy.

How to cite this article

Kakar S, Dhingra A, Sharma H. Shaping Potential of Manual NiTi K-File and Rotary ProTaper and Analyzing the Final Outcome of Shaped Canals using CT. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(3):451-455.


PDF Share
  1. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary NiTi instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography. Int Endodontic Journal 2005;38;402-408.
  2. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile. 04 and Lightspeed rotary NiTi instruments. Int Endodontic Journal 2002;35:37-46.
  3. An initial investigation of the bending and torsional properties of nitinol root canal files. JOE 1988;14:346-351.
  4. Effects of four NiTi preparation techniques on root canal geometry assured by micro computed tomography. Int Endodontic Journal 2001;34:221-230.
  5. Shaping ability of ProTaper Nickel-Titanium files in simulated resin root canal. Int Endodontic Journal 2004;37:613-623.
  6. In vitro comparison of shaping abilities of ProTaper and GT Rotary files. J Endodon 2004 Mar;30(3):163-166.
  7. ProTaper rotary root canal preparation: effects of canal anatomy on final shape analysed by micro CT. Int Endodontic Journal 2003;36:86-92.
  8. Endodontics, 5th ed. Elsvier: 405-570.
  9. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in curved root canals of extracted teeth. Int Endodontic Journal 2007;40;707-714.
  10. Progressive versus constant tapered shaft design using NiTi. Rotary instruments. Int Endodontic Journal 2003;35;820-828.
  11. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motions (Part 3). Resistance to bending and fracture. JOE 1997;23;141.
  12. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium hand instruments, JOE 2001;27:197-202
  13. A reconstructed computerized tomographic comparison of NiTi rotary GTTM files versus traditional instruments in shaped canals by novice operators, int. Endodontic Journal 2001;34:476-484.
  14. A methodology for evaluation of root canal instrumentations. JOE 1987;13:243-245.
  15. CT evaluation of canal preparation using rotary and hand NiTi instruments: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2010 Jan-Mar;13(1):16-22.
  16. Digital and advanced imaging in endodontics: a review. JOE 2007 Jan;33(1):1-6.
  17. Microcomputed tomography: a new tool for experimental endodontology 1999;32:165-170.
  18. Effects of root canal preparation on apical geometry assessed by micro-computed tomography. JOE 2009 July;35(7):1056-1059.
  19. New dimensions in endodontics imaging: Part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems, Int Endodontic Journal 2009 June;42(60):447-462.
  20. A comparative study of endo flare-Heroshaper and M two NiTi instruments in the preparation of curved canals, Int Endodontic Journal 2005;38:610-616.
  21. Evaluation of success root of endodontic treatment performed by students with stainless steel K-file and NiTi hand files. JOE 2000;27:124-126.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.