The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 4 ( July-August, 2013 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Going Green with Eco-friendly Dentist

Bhagyalakshmi Avinash, BM Shivalinga, S Jyothikiran, MN Padmini

Citation Information : Avinash B, Shivalinga B, Jyothikiran S, Padmini M. Going Green with Eco-friendly Dentist. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (4):766-769.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1400

Published Online: 01-08-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

How to cite this article

Avinash B, Avinash BS, Shivalinga BM, Jyothikiran S, Padmini MN. Going Green with Eco-friendly Dentistry. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(4):766-769.


PDF Share
  1. Audit of waste collected over 1 week from ten dental practices. A pilot study. Aust Dent J 1997;42(2):114-117.
  2. Mecury in our environment. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32(7):556-563.
  3. Cost effectiveness of removing amalgam from dental waste water. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32(7):564-573.
  4. Environmental impact assessment for domestic solid waste landfill project. Environmental Research Center: Royal Scientific Society. From American Search Elite 2002.
  5. Visualizing environmental science. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons 2007.
  6. Eco-friendly dentistry. Not a matter of choice. Canadian Dental Association 2007;73(7):581-584.
  7. Environmental science: a global concern. 8th ed. New York: Mc Graw-Hill 2008.
  8. CDA position on dental amalgam, February 2005.
  9. The environmental effects of dental amalgam. Aust Dent J 2000;45(4):246-249.
  10. Amalgam waste management: issues and answers. NY State Dent J 2000;66(8):20-24.
  11. Understanding the mercury reduction issue: the impact of mercury on the environment and human health. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32(7):574-559.
  12. Disposing of hazardous waste management studies. Ont Dent 1994;71(7):19, 20, 35.
  13. Creating an environmentally friendly dental practice. CDS Rev 1999;12-18.
  14. Mercury pollution in dental office waste water. J Can Assoc 2000;66(4):174-175.
  15. Canad-wide Standard on mercury for dental amalgam waste 2001;1-6.
  16. The toxicology of mercurycurrent exposures and clinical manifestations. N Engl J Med 2003;349(18):1731-1737.
  17. Mercury derived from dental amalgam and neuropsychologic function. Environ Health Perspect 2003;1115(50):719-723.
  18. Putting dental mercury pollution into perspective. Br Dent J 2004;197(4):175-177.
  19. Characteristics and treatment of the dental waste water stream, Chicago: waste management and research centre, University of Illinois Chicago; 2012.
  20. Estimated quantity of mercury in amalgam waste water residue released by dentists into the sewerage system in Ontario, Canada. J Can Dent Assoc 2004;70(11):759a-f.
  21. The use of CDA best management practices and amalgam seperatorsto improve the management of dental waste water. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32(7):583-592.
  22. Canada-wide standards: a pollution prevention program for dental amalgam waste. J Can Dent Assoc 2001;67(5):270-273.
  23. June 2005.
  24. The weight of wastes generated by removal of dental amalgam restorations and the concentration of mercury in dental waste water. J Calif Dent Assoc 2002;68(9):553-558.
  25. Dental equipment-amalgam seperators. Geneva, Switzerland. International Organization for Standardization 1999.
  26. N, Gasparac W, Sandrik J, Meyer DM. Laboratory evaluation of amalgam seperators. J Am Dent Assoc 2002;133(5):577-584.
  27. the four ‘Rs’ of Eco-friendly dentistry. American dental practice. Canadian Dentistry Association 2008; 22(8):18-21.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.