The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 5 ( September-October, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

The Correction of Maxillary Deficiency with Internal Distraction Devices: A Multidisciplinary Approach

A Alper Öz, Mete Özer, Lütfi Eroglu, Oguz Suleyman Özdemir

Citation Information : Öz AA, Özer M, Eroglu L, Özdemir OS. The Correction of Maxillary Deficiency with Internal Distraction Devices: A Multidisciplinary Approach. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (5):957-962.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1433

Published Online: 00-10-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this case report is to present the orthodontic, surgical and restorative treatments in the case of an operated cleft lip and palate and severe maxillary deficiency in a 14-year-old female patient.

Background

Only orthodontic treatment could be inefficient for cleft lip and palate patients characterized with maxillary hypoplasia. Orthodontic and surgical treatment shows sufficient results, especially with severe skeletal deficiency.

Case report

A cleft lip and palate patient required complex multidisciplinary treatment to preserve health and restore esthetics. Dental leveling and alignment of the maxillary and mandibular teeth were provided before the surgery. Maxillary advancement and clockwise rotation of the maxillary-mandibular complex was applied by a Le Fort 1 osteotomy with two internal distraction devices. After the active treatment including orthodontic treatment and orthognathic surgery, upper full mouth ceramic restoration was applied.

Conclusion

This report shows the efficiency of internal distraction devices in cleft lip palate patients and exemplifies the multidisciplinary care required for such difficult cases.

Clinical significance

Stable improved occlusion and skeletal relations were observed after a follow-up examination period of 12 months.

How to cite this article

Öz AA, Özer M, Eroglu L, Özdemir OS. The Correction of Maxillary Deficiency with Internal Distraction Devices: A Multidisciplinary Approach. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(5):957-962.


PDF Share
  1. Craniofacial distraction osteogenesis: a review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofa Surg 2001;30:89-103.
  2. Distraction osteogenesis of the human craniofacial skeleton: initial experience with a new distraction system. J Craniofac Surg 1995;6:368-374.
  3. The skeletal stability of one-piece Le Fort 1 osteotomy to advance the maxilla (part 1): stability resulting from non-bone grafted rigid fixation. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;42:221-225.
  4. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis using a rigid external distraction device in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114(6):1382-1394.
  5. Maxillary distraction for the management of cleft maxillary hypoplasia with a rigid external distraction system. Semin Orthod 1999;5:46-51.
  6. Soft tissue profile changes after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis by use of a rigid external distraction device: a 1-year follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000;58:959-969.
  7. Internal midface distraction in correction of severe maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005;116:51.
  8. Advancement of the anterior maxilla by distraction (case report). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2004;32:150-154.
  9. A meta-analysis of cleft maxillary osteotomy and distraction osteogenesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:14-24.
  10. Management of severe maxillary deficiency in childhood and adolescence through distraction osteogenesis with an external, adjustable, rigid distraction device. J Craniofac Surg 1997;8(3):181-185.
  11. Rigid external distraction: Its application in cleft maxillary deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102(5):1360-1372.
  12. Complications in the use of the halo fixation device. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1986;68:320-325.
  13. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for advancement in cleft patients, internal devices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:2592-2597.
  14. Speech considerations with maxillary advancement procedures. J Oral Surg 1980;38:752-758.
  15. Alterations in velopharyngeal function after maxillary advancement in cleft palate patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:685-689.
  16. Changes in speech following maxillary distraction osteogenesis. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38(3):199-205.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.