The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 14 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2013 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Quantitative Evaluation of Apical Extrusion of Debris and Irrigants using Four Rotary Instrumentation Systems: An in vitro Study

P Ratnakar, S Aspalli Nagaveni, K Reddy Balakoti, Karan Smita, SV Satish, T Aravind

Citation Information : Ratnakar P, Nagaveni SA, Balakoti KR, Smita K, Satish S, Aravind T. Quantitative Evaluation of Apical Extrusion of Debris and Irrigants using Four Rotary Instrumentation Systems: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013; 14 (6):1065-1069.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1452

Published Online: 01-12-2013

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2013; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Clinical significance

The apical extrusion of infected debris may have the potential to disrupt the balance between microbial aggression and host defense, resulting in incidents of acute inflammation. During preparation, irrigants and debris, such as bacteria, dentin filings and necrotic tissue may be extruded into the periradicular region leading to periapical inflammation and postoperative flare ups. Using an instrumentation technique that minimizes apical extrusion would be beneficial to both the practitioner and patient.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the weight of debris and volume of irrigant extruded apically from extracted teeth in vitro after endodontic instrumentation using four different rotary root canal instrumentation systems.

Materials and methods

Four groups of each 20 extracted mandibular premolars were instrumented using one of the four systems: ProTaper Universal (Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland)), Hero-shaper (MicroMega, Besancon, France), RaCe (FKG Dentaire, La-Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) and K3 (SybronEndo, West Collins, CA). Debris and irrigant extruded from the apical foramen during instrumentation were collected in preweighed test tubes. Volume of irrigant extruded was noted. The containers were stored in incubator at 70° for two days to evaporate the moisture. Weight of dry debris was noted.

Statistical analysis

Data was analyzed using Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U test at a significance of 0.001.

Results

The results indicated that all of the instrumentation systems tested caused measurable apical extrusion of debris and irrigants. Higher extrusion was observed with Protaper system which was statistically significant with Hero-Shaper, RaCe and K3 systems. There were no statistical differences between Hero-shaper, K3 and RaCe systems (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

All instrumentation techniques apically extruded debris and irrigant. However, Hero-shaper, K3 and RaCe systems produced less extruded debris and irrigant than the Protaper system.

How to cite this article

Nagaveni SA, Balakoti KR, Smita K, Ratnakar P, Satish SV, Aravind T. Quantitative Evaluation of Apical Extrusion of Debris and Irrigants using Four Rotary Instrumentation Systems: A in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14(6):1065-1069.


PDF Share
  1. Flare-ups in endodontics: I. etiological factors. J Endod 1985;11:472-478.
  2. Microbial causes of endodontic flare-ups. Int Endod J 2003;36:453-463.
  3. A quantitative assessment of canal debris forced periapically during root canal instrumentation using two different techniques. J Endod 1987;13:554-558.
  4. Endodontic flare ups: bacteriological and immunological mechanisms. J Endod 1985;11:462-464.
  5. Inflammatory and immunological aspects of the pathogenesis of human periapical lesions. J Endod 1985:479-488.
  6. Canal blockage and debris extrusion with eight preparation techniques. J Endod 1995;21:154-158.
  7. Effect of irrigation on the production of extruded material at the root apex during instrumentation. J Endod 1975;1:243-241.
  8. The effect of endosonic and hand manipulation on the amount of root canal material extruded. Oral Surg 1982;53:611-613.
  9. The effect of four preparation techniques on the amount of apically extruded debris. J Endod 1987;13:102-108.
  10. Comparison of balanced force, endosonic and step back filing instrumentation techniques: Quantification of extruded apical debris. J Endod 1990;16:24-28.
  11. J Endod 1998;24:180-183.
  12. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary NiTi instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed radiography. Int Endod J 2005;38:402-408.
  13. Apical transportation: a comparative evaluation of three root canal instrumentation techniques with three different apical diameters. J Endod 2008;34:1545-1548.
  14. The effect of effervescence on debridement of the apical regions of root canals in single rooted teeth. J Endod 1981;7:335-341.
  15. Apical extrusion of debris and irrigants using two hand and three engine driven instrumentation techniques. Int Endod J 2001;34:354-348.
  16. Comparison of debris extruded apically in straight canals. Conventional filing verses Profile 04 taper series 29. J Endod 1998;24:18-24.
  17. Comparison of amount of apically extruded debris using hand piece driven nickel titanium instrument system. J Endod 1998;21:102-118.
  18. Tissue reactions following apical plugging of the root canal with infected dentin chips. Oral Surgery 1980;49:366-371.
  19. An in vitro comparative study of apically extruded debris resulting from conventional and three rotary (Profile, RaCe, FlexMaster) instrumentation techniques.
  20. Quantitative evaluation of the amount of apically extruded debris using 3 different rotary instrumentation systems. Oral Surg 2006;101:250-257.
  21. Apical extrusion of intracanal debris and irrigant following use of various instrumentation techniques. Oral Surg 2008;105:257-262.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.