The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

In vitro Evaluation of Topical Fluoride ph and their Effect on Surface Hardness of Composite Resin-based Restorative Materials

Samir Mansuri, Abdul Mujeeb, Seema Abid Hussain, Kausar Ramaswamy

Citation Information : Mansuri S, Mujeeb A, Hussain SA, Ramaswamy K. In vitro Evaluation of Topical Fluoride ph and their Effect on Surface Hardness of Composite Resin-based Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (2):190-194.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1513

Published Online: 01-04-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of the study was to correlate the pH and fluoride ion uptake with surface hardness of composite resin based restorative materials after topical fluoride application.

Methodology

Forty disks of each of test materials Composite (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), Resin modified glass ionomer (Vitremer) and Compomer (Dyract AP) were made and ten disks of each material were placed in different test solutions – 1.23% APF gel, Sodium fluoride mouth rinse, 0.9% neutral fluoride and distilled water (Control group). After 36 hours of immersion, specimens were subjected to microhardness testing machine for evaluation of surface hardness.

Results

The greater hardness deterioration for all materials resulted with 1.23% APF gel when compared to the control group. Composite (Filtek Z350XT, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA) showed 17.13 VHN (control group 59.11 VHN). Vitremer showed 9.71 VHN (control group 37.71 VHN). Compomer showed 19.22 VHN (control group 36.78 VHN).

Conclusion

1.23% ApF gel significantly decreased hardness of composite, Vitremer and Compomer. Hardness deterioration associated with sodium fluoride mouth rinse and 0.9% neutral fluoride was less compared to 1.23% ApF gel.

How to cite this article

Mujeeb A, Mansuri S. Hussain SA, Ramaswamy K. In vitro Evaluation of Topical Fluoride pH and their Effect on Surface Hardness of Composite Resin-based Restorative Materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(2): 190-194.


PDF Share
  1. Fluorides in preventive dentistry. Ist ed. Mr Sudhir Kumar Arya. For Arya (Medi) Publishing House, 1999 April.
  2. Tooth colored restoratives principles and techniques. 9th ed. Bc Decker Inc 2002.
  3. Effects of professionally applied topical fluorides on surface hardness of composite-based restoratives. Operative Dentistry 2002;2(6):576-581.
  4. Effect of mouth rinses on salivary sorption, solubility and surface degradation of a nanofilled and a hybrid resin composite. Oper Dent 2010;35(1):105-111.
  5. Effect of ethanol in mouth rinses on the surface hardness of a dental resin composite material. Padjadjaran J Dent 2009;21(3):8-13.
  6. Effect of five commercial mouth rinses on the microhardness and color stability of two resin composite restorative materials. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 2007;1(4):667-674.
  7. Effects of mouth washes on knoop hardness and surface roughness of dental composites after different immersion times. Braz Oral Res 2011;25(2):168-173.
  8. The effect of different mouth rinses on micro hardness of tooth colored restorative materials. J Pak Dent Assoc 2005;14(3):150-153.
  9. In vitro effects of alcohol. Containing and alcohol free mouthrinses on microhardness of some restorative materials. J Oral Rehab 1997;24(3):244-226.
  10. Effect of mouth rinses on microhardness and wear of composite and compomer restoratives. Oper Dent 2003;28(6):740-746.
  11. Influence of acidulated phosphate fluoride agent and effectiveness of subsequent polishing on composite material surfaces. Operative Dent 2002;27(3):305-310.
  12. Resin ionomer restorative materials. The new generation. J Esthet Dent 1994;6(5):207-215.
  13. Surface hardness change of restorative filling materials in saliva. Dent Mater 2001;17(1):34-39.
  14. Physical properties of dental materials and their selection. Illinois: Quintessence Publishing Company 1977.p.18.
  15. Mechanical properties of dental materials in phillip's science of dental materials. 10th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunder's Co. 1996.p.69.
  16. Effect of fluoride gels on micromorphology of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements and polyacid-modified resin composites. Quintessence Int 2001;32(7):571-577.
  17. Effect of topical fluoride agents on the morphologic characteristics and composition of resin composite restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77(4):405-413.
  18. Effect of 1.23% APF gel on fluoride releasing restorative materials. J Dent Child 2000 Sep-Oct;67(5):330-337.
  19. Effect of home use fluoride gels on resin modified glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent 1998;23(3):2-9.
  20. Effects of APF gel on the physical structure of compomers and glass ionomer cements. Operative Dent 2001;26(3):231-238.
  21. In vitro effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the surface of composites with different filler particles. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56(2):161-169.
  22. Available from: http://htpp//solutions.3mae.ae/wps/portal/3M/en-AE/3M-ESPE [Last accessed on 2011 Sep 20].
  23. Mechanism of polymer degradation and erosion. Biomaterials 1996;17(2):103-114.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.