The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 2 ( March-April, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Texture of Composite Resins Exposed to Two- and Three- Body Wear in vitro

Masafumi Kanehira, Werner J Finger, Keiichi Sasaki, Naohiko Iwasaki, Hidekazu Takahashi, Natthavoot Koottathape

Citation Information : Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Sasaki K, Iwasaki N, Takahashi H, Koottathape N. Texture of Composite Resins Exposed to Two- and Three- Body Wear in vitro. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (2):232-241.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1521

Published Online: 01-04-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Purpose

To analyze on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures from eight composite resins, taken in the centers of the initial, the middle and the terminal thirds of in vitro produced wear tracks morphological features to explain causative mechanisms for the material wear observed under two- and three-body wear.

Materials and methods

In vitro wear behavior of eight composite resins, three conventional and five nanofiller containing marketed products was evaluated using a custommade Zr-ball-on-disk sliding device. The composite specimens were subjected to 50,000 one-way sliding cycles (1.2 Hz, 50 N load), either simulating two-body wear with water as the intermediate medium or three-body wear using aqueous suspensions of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) beads and poppy seeds, respectively. Volume loss of the materials was determined in previous study. Representative specimens were selected for inspection by scanning electron microscopy at 500-fold magnification. From each of the 24 wear tracks microphotographs were taken in the central deepest parts of the initial, middle and terminal thirds of the tracks.

Results

For most materials morphological differences were detected depending on the location within the wear track. As a rule, the surface deterioration found increased toward the final part of the wear scar. According to common classification in tribology abrasive wear and fatigue wear, or a combination of both mechanisms were found for all materials tested. Wear was dependent both on the testing mode and on the composition of the individual composite resin material.

Conclusion

The morphological assessment of wear tracks reflects the nature of the abrasive and reveals insight into the mechanism generating wear patterns. Morphological details confirmed abrasive and fatigue-related wear as main failure mechanisms. Selection of food-like slurries as third-body media, such as poppy seed suspension is mandatory to simulate wear of composite restorations in occlusal cavities where three-body wear is the dominating determinant of loss of substance and surface deterioration.

How to cite this article

Iwasaki N, Takahashi H, Koottathape N, Kanehira M, Finger WJ, Sasaki K. Texture of Composite Resins Exposed to Two- and Three-Body Wear in vitro. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(2):232-241.


PDF Share
  1. Is the wear of dental composites still a clinical concern? Is there still a need for in vitro wear simulating devices? Dent Mater 2006;22:689-692.
  2. Tribology handbook. London: Butterworths 1973.
  3. Resin-based composite performance: Are there some things we can't predict? Dent Mater 2013;29:51-58.
  4. Nanofilled and microhybrid composite restorations: Five-year clinical wear performances. Dent Mater 2011;27:692-700.
  5. How to simulate wear? Overview of existing methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:693-701.
  6. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:712-734.
  7. Correlation of wear in vivo and six laboratory wear methods. Dent Mater 2012;28:961-973.
  8. Wear of a dental composite in an artificial oral environment: A clinical correlation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B 2012;100B:2297-2306.
  9. Quantitative wear and wear damage analysis of composite resins in vitro. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2014;29:508-516.
  10. Effects of cyclic loading on occlusal contact wear of composite restoratives. Dent Mater 2002;18:149-158.
  11. Wear of three dental composites under different testing conditions. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:756-764.
  12. Influence of filler loading on the two-body wear of a dental composite. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:729-737.
  13. Wear and fatigue behavior of nano-structured dental resin composites. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater 2006;78B:196-203.
  14. Softening of BISGMA-based polymers by ethanol and by organic acids of plaque. Scand J Dent Res 1984;92:257-261.
  15. Influence of the antagonist material on the wear of different composites using two different wear simulation methods. Dent Mater 2006;22:166-175.
  16. Influence of shearing action of food on contact stress and subsequent wear of stress-bearing composites. J Dent Res 1993;72:56-61.
  17. Dental Materials-Guidance on testing of wear. Part 2. Wear by two-and/or three-body contact 2001.
  18. Effect of abrasion medium on wear of stress-bearing composites and amalgam in vitro. J Dent Res 1986;65:645-658.
  19. Correlation between in vitro and in vivo wear of posterior restorative materials. Dent Mater 1987;3:280-286.
  20. Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. Dent Mater 1996;12:218-226.
  21. Characterization of third-body media particles and their effect on in vitro composite wear. Dent Mater 2012;28:e118-e126.
  22. Evaluation of clinical performance for posterior composite resins and dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 1987;12:53-78.
  23. Occlusal abrasion of a composite restorative resin with ultra-fine filler—an initial study. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 1978;9:73-78.
  24. Protection hypothesis for composite wear. Dent Mater 1992;8:305-309.
  25. Comparative evaluation of mechanical characteristics of nanofiller containing resin composites. Am J Dent 2011;24:264-270.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.