The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 15 , ISSUE 6 ( November-December, 2014 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effectiveness of an Infiltrant on sealing of Composite Restoration Margins with/without Artificial Caries

Sibel A Antonson, Ozlem Tulunoglu, Ibrahim Fevzi Tulunoglu, Marc Campillo-Funollet, Donald Antonson, Carlos Munoz-Viveros

Citation Information : Antonson SA, Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu IF, Campillo-Funollet M, Antonson D, Munoz-Viveros C. Effectiveness of an Infiltrant on sealing of Composite Restoration Margins with/without Artificial Caries. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014; 15 (6):717-725.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1605

Published Online: 01-12-2014

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a resin infiltrant (ICON) on marginal sealing ability of class II resin restorations with/without-caries.

Materials and methods

Forty-eight noncarious human premolar teeth were embedded and MO and DO preparations of standard dimensions were prepared. The left side of dentin margins of the cavities were left nonbonded (UB) while the right side were bonded using total etch-bonding agent and all restored with a Nanohybrid composite. The teeth were thermocycled and half of the specimens in the UB and B groups were subjected to an artificial caries process. ICON was applied to caries and noncaries subgroups following the manufacturer's directions. Impressions were made at each step: after the restorations were completed, thermocycling, artificial caries procedures, and infiltrant application and the silicone tag lengths were measured with a stereomicroscope. The specimens were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsine at 37° C for 24 hours, sectioned and microleakage was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. Selected samples and their replicas were assessed for marginal quality under a stereomicroscope and SEM. Statistical evaluation of the data were made using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Sign Rank tests.

Results

While bonding application did not create a meaningful difference, the thermocycling and artificial caries significantly increased the gap length and microleakage (p < 0.05). ICON application was decreased the microleakage, created gap-free margins and closed the gaps which were previously occurred at the same cavities (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

A resin infiltrant (ICON) application decreased the microleakage, created gap-free margins and closed the gaps, which previously occurred at the same cavities.

Clinical significance

Approximal application of resin infiltrant may increase the success of the class II composite restorations also reduced the risk of needing more complex restoration therapy.

How to cite this article

Tulunoglu O, Tulunoglu IF, Antonson SA, Campillo-Funollet M, Antonson D, Munoz-Viveros C. Effectiveness of an Infiltrant on Sealing of Composite Restoration Margins with/without Artificial Caries. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014;15(6): 717-725.


PDF Share
  1. The nonoperative resin treatment of proximal caries lesions. Dental Update 2012;39:614-622.
  2. Infiltrating/sealing proximal caries lesions: A 3-year randomized clinical trial. J Dent Res 2012;91:288-292.
  3. Sealing occlusal lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2-3 years of follow-up. Clin Oral Invest 2012;16:521-529.
  4. Treatment of proximal superficial caries lesions on primary molar teeth with resin infiltration and fluoride varnish versus fluoride varnish only: Efficacy after 1 year. Caries Res 2010;44:41-46.
  5. Changes in the treatment concept for approximal caries from 1983 to 2009 in Norway. Caries Res 2011;45:113-120.
  6. Remineralization/desensitization: what is known? What is the future? Adv Dent Res 2009;21:83-86.
  7. Progression of artificial enamel caries lesions after infiltration with experimental light curing resins. Caries Res 2008;42:117-124.
  8. Sealing of minimally invasive class II fillings (slot) using an adhesive patch: Sealant margin extension for prevention. Oper Dent 2007;32:482-487.
  9. Evidence-based clinical recommendations for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Dent Clin North Am 2009;53:131-147.
  10. Review of the effects of infiltrants and sealers on noncavitated enamel lesions. Oral Health Preventive Dentistry 2010;8:295-305.
  11. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of class V resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2006;31:481-488.
  12. The efficiency of a new polishing material: Nanotechnology liquid polish. Oper Dent 2010;35:362-369.
  13. Influence of surface sealants on microleakage of composite resin restorations. J Dent Child 2008;75:204-208.
  14. Effect of surface sealants on microleakage of class II restorations after thermocycling and long-term water storage. J Adhes Dent 2011;13:249-254.
  15. Effect of surface sealants on marginal microleakage in class V resin composite restorations. J Est Restor Dent 2009;21:397-406.
  16. Effect of three surface sealants on marginal sealing of class V composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 2000;25(5):448-445.
  17. Effect of resealing on microleakage of resin composite restorations in relationship to margin design and composite type. Eur J Dent 2012;6:389-395.
  18. Use of synthetic polymer gels for artificial carious lesions preparation. Caries Res 1987;21:228-242.
  19. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 2012;28:87-101.
  20. Seconder caries susceptibility of teeth with long-term performing composite restoration. J Oral Rehab 2002;29:1131-1138.
  21. Longevity of posterior dental restorations and reason of failure. Eur J Oral Sci 2012;120:539-548.
  22. Moncada GA. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Braz Dent J 2011;22:134-139.
  23. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: 5-year results using sealants. Oper Dent 2013;38:125-133.
  24. Influence of thermal stress on marginal integrity of restorative materials. J Appl Oral Sci 2008;16:106-110.
  25. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
  26. Effect of the curing method and composite volume on marginal and internal adaptation of composite restoratives. Oper Dent 2011;36:231-238.
  27. Infiltrants inhibit progression of natural lesions in vitro. J Dental Res 2010;89:1276-1280.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.