The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Influence of Image Filters and Variation in Horizontal Angle of Incidence of X-ray Beam in Digital Interproximal Radiographs for Diagnosis of Secondary Caries in Esthetic Restorations

Lucas de Carvalho Deprá, Lilian Cristina Vessoni Iwaki, Mariliani Chicarelli, Wilton Mitsunari Takeshita

Citation Information : de Carvalho Deprá L, Iwaki LC, Chicarelli M, Takeshita WM. Influence of Image Filters and Variation in Horizontal Angle of Incidence of X-ray Beam in Digital Interproximal Radiographs for Diagnosis of Secondary Caries in Esthetic Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (10):805-812.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1761

Published Online: 01-10-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Background

Secondary or recurrent caries are located around restoration margins or under these lesions, and can lead to tooth loss. The interproximal or bite wing radiograph is the technique of choice to assist diagnosis of secondary caries.

Objective

To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of secondary caries in pulpal walls artificially created in extracted human premolars, observed in digital bitewing radiographs using variations in horizontal X-ray beam angle of incidence and application of enhancement filters.

Materials and methods

The sample consisted of 20 healthy premolars, in which secondary caries lesions were simulated by means of subjecting the pulpal wall of the cavity to wear with spherical carbide drill half, fitted to a high speed handpiece, under constant cooling, focused perpendicular to the tooth surface. The orifices were filled with wax and all teeth were restored with composite resin Filtek Z350 XT®. Later teeth were radiographed with a digital sensor complementary metal-oxidesemiconductor (CMOS) varying the horizontal angle at intervals of 2°, covering a range of −10 to +10°.

Results

The results showed that in the diagnosis of secondary caries, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 pseudocolor filters, and negative and direct digital radiography. The pseudocolor filter no. 1 showed statistically significant differences, except at a horizontal angle of 0°, thus indicating lower efficiency in the diagnosis of secondary caries.

Conclusion

Secondary caries with esthetic pulp wall restoration can be diagnosed irrespective of variation in the horizontal angle of incidence of the X-ray beam. The use of different radiographic enhancement filters did not result in improved diagnosis of secondary caries.

How to cite this article

Deprá LC, Iwaki LCV, Chicarelli M, Takeshita WM. Influence of Image Filters and Variation in Horizontal Angle of Incidence of X-ray Beam in Digital Interproximal Radiographs for Diagnosis of Secondary Caries in Esthetic Restorations. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(10): 805-812.


PDF Share
  1. Digital imaging for dental caries. Dental Clinics of North America 2000;44:319-338.
  2. Accuracy of computerautomated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers. Europ J Oral Sci 2002;110:199-203.
  3. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of direct digital radiography system, filtered images and subtraction radiography. Contempor Clin Dentist 2013;4:338-342.
  4. Prevalence and incidence of caries lesions in relation to placement and replacement of fillings: a longitudinal observational radiographic study of an adult Danish population. Caries Res 2009;43:286-293.
  5. Caries detection under composite restorations by laser fluorescence and digital radiography. Clin Oral Invest 2013;17:2079-2084.
  6. Scanning resolution and the detection of approximal caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2001;30:166-171.
  7. Reliability of digital radiography of interproximal dental caries. Am J Dentist 2003;16:170-176.
  8. Better imaging: the advantages of digital radiography. J Am Dentist Assoc 2008;139:7S-13S.
  9. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of bitewing, periapical, unfiltered and filtered digital panoramic images for approximal caries detection in posterior teeth. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:458-463.
  10. A comparison of the accuracy of digital and conventional radiography in the diagnosis of recurrent caries. J Contempor Dent Pract 2010;11:25-32.
  11. Accuracy of diagnosing occlusal caries using enhanced digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:236-240.
  12. Influence of image filters on the reproducibility of measurements of alveolar bone loss. J Appl Oral Sci 2006;14:415-420.
  13. Detection of noncavitated approximal caries lesions in digital images from seven solid-state receptors with particular focus on task-specific enhancement filters. An ex vivo study in human teeth. Clin Oral Investigations 2008;12:217-223.
  14. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films. J Digi Imag 2009;22:242-249.
  15. In vitro study into the influence of X-ray beam angulation on the detection of artificial caries defects on bitewing radiographs. Car Res 1989;23:334-341.
  16. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008;37:142-148.
  17. Efficacy of application of pseudocolor filters in the detection of interproximal caries. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prosp 2010;4:79-82.
  18. Oral radiology: principles and interpretation. 6th ed. St. Louis: Mosby/Elsevier 2009;109-151.
  19. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries. Braz Oral Res 2013;27:245-251.
  20. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
  21. Conventional, digital and contrast enhanced bite wing radiographs in the decision to restore approximal carious lesions. Caries Res 2001;35:193-199.
  22. Color conversion of alveolar bone density changes in digital subtraction images. J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:209-214.
  23. Comparison of observer reliability in assessing alveolar bone changes from color-coded with subtraction radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999;28:31-36.
  24. An in vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Car Res 2001;35:354-359.
  25. Proximal caries detection: sirona sidexis versus Kodak Ektaspeed Plus. Gen Dentist 2005;53:43-48.
  26. The efficiency of three different films and rodiovisography in detecting approximal carious lesions. Quintessence Int 2005;36:65-70.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.