Globally, India accounts for the highest number of oral cancer cases. The survival rates are about 30% lower than those in developing countries. The main reason for these dismal figures is the late presentation of patients. In order to downstage oral cancer in such a scenario, screening and diagnosis at an early stage is warranted. A pragmatic approach is needed for an oral cancer screening program, hence a mobile health (mHealth) approach was used. In this approach, health workers were empowered with mobile phones with decision-based algorithm. Risk stratification of tobacco habit enables us to identify lesions associated with particular habits.
Materials and methods
A specific cohort of factory employees who predominantly had pure tobacco chewing habit was chosen to examine the effect of pure tobacco on oral mucosa. One thousand three hundred and fifty-seven subjects were screened in two phases. In the first phase, habits and oral lesions were identified and photographed. The photographs were remotely diagnosed by an oral medicine specialist and those subjects requiring biopsy were recalled for phase II. Cytology and biopsy were performed in phase II.
Results
The predominant habit was smokeless tobacco (SLT), in 582 subjects. The most commonly encountered lesion was tobacco pouch keratosis seen in 397 subjects. Biopsy was performed for 71 subjects, most cases showed hyperkeratosis and mild dysplasia. One subject had moderate dysplasia.
Conclusion
There was minimal alteration of tissues in our study subjects, which can be considered as low-risk. Use of mHealth empowered frontline healthcare workers to identify subjects with lesions and enabled remote diagnosis by specialist in resource-constrained settings.
Clinical significance
Use of mHealth enabled us have an electronic record of subject details. This data shall be used for a planned follow-up of the same cohort after 3 years.
How to cite this article
Desai R, Birur P, Bajaj S, Shubhasini AR, Bhanushree R, Shubha G, Keerthi G, Tiwari V, Patrick S, Hegde U, Shetty S, Nagabhushan V, Kankanala S, Shah S. Smokeless Tobacco-associated Lesions: A Mobile Health Approach. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(10):813-818.
Living with oral cancer: epidemiology with particular reference to prevalence and life-style changes that influence survival. Oral Oncol 2010;46:407-410.
Malignant transformation of oral potentially malignant disorders in males: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cancer 2009;9:260.
Effect of screening on oral cancer mortality in Kerala, India: a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2005;365:1927-1933.
Smokeless tobacco and oral cancer: a review of the risks and determinants. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2004;15:252-263.
A study of oral precancerous lesions in relation to tobacco habituation. Int J Med Clin Res 2014;5:282-285.
Burket's Oral Medicine. 11th ed. BC Decker Inc 2008. p.100-101.
Kuppuswamy's socioeconomic status scale: a revision of income parameter for 2014. Int J Recent Trends Sci Technol 2014;11:1-2.
Burden of cancer and projections for 2016, Indian scenario: gaps in the availability of radiotherapy treatment facilities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2008;9:671-677.
Cancer mortality in India: a nationally representative survey. Lancet 2012;379:2343-2351.
Living with oral cancer: epidemiology with particular reference to prevalence and lifestyle changes that influence survival. Oral Oncol 2010;46:407-410.
Epidemiology, control and prevention of tobacco induced oral mucosal lesions in India. Ind J Cancer 2014;51:80-85.
Health-related behaviors in older adults in relationship with socioeconomic status. Am J Prev Med 2010;38:39-46.
Prevalence of potentially malignant oral mucosal lesions among tobacco users in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014;15:757-762.
The correlation between the frequency of oral lesions and the amount of smokeless tobacco usage in patients referred to oral medicine department Zahedan dental school. J Dent Shiraz Univ Med Sci 2014;15:81-85.
A correlative study of smokeless tobacco-induced lesion and smoke-induced leukoplakia in various aspects. J Ind Acad Oral Med Radiol 2011;23:86-91.
Do different types of smokeless tobacco products cause differing or similar oral lesions? Face Mouth and Jaw Surgery. Int Trainee J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;4:1-9.
Epithelial dysplasia of the oral mucosa—Diagnostic problems and prognostic features. Current Diag Pathol 2006;12:11-21.
Comparison between liquid-based cytology and conventional exfoliative cytology in the diagnosis of head and neck carcinomas. Braz Res Pediatr Dent Integr Clinic 2011;11(1):65-71.
Comparison of centrifuged liquid based cytology method with conventional brush cytology in oral lesions. Eur J Gen Dent 2012;1:192-196
Oral tissue alterations associated with the use of smokeless tobacco by teenagers. Part I. Clinical findings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1983;56:275-284.
Retrospective study on risk habits among oral cancer patients in Karnataka Cancer Therapy and Research Institute, Hubli, India. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev 2011;12:1561-1566.
Systematic review and meta-analysis of association of smokeless tobacco and of betel quid without tobacco with incidence of oral cancer in South Asia and the Pacific. PLoS ONE 2014;9:e113385.
