The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 11 ( November, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Cleaning of Root Canal System by Different Irrigation Methods

Renato de Toledo Leonardo, Gisselle Moraima Chávez-Andrade, Mario Tanomaru-Filho, Juliane Maria Guerreiro-Tanomaru, Lucas Martinati Miano, Fernanda Ferrari Esteves Torres

Citation Information : de Toledo Leonardo R, Chávez-Andrade GM, Tanomaru-Filho M, Guerreiro-Tanomaru JM, Miano LM, Torres FF. Cleaning of Root Canal System by Different Irrigation Methods. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (11):859-863.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1771

Published Online: 01-11-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the cleaning of main and lateral canals using the irrigation methods: negative pressure irrigation (EndoVac system), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) and manual irrigation (MI).

Materials and methods

Resin teeth were used. After root canal preparation, four lateral canals were made at 2 and 7 mm from the apex. Root canals were filled with contrast solution and radiographed pre- and post-irrigation using digital radiographic system [radiovisiography (RVG)]. The irrigation protocols were: MI1—manual irrigation [22 G needle at 5 mm short of working length-WL]; MI2—manual irrigation (30G needle at 2 mm short of WL); PUI; EV1—EndoVac (microcannula at 1 mm short of WL); EV2—Endovac (microcannula at 3 mm short of WL). The obtained images, initial (filled with contrast solution) and final (after irrigation) were analyzed by using image tool 3.0 software. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey tests (5% significance level).

Results

EV1 and EV2, followed by PUI showed better cleaning capacity than manual irrigation (MI1 and MI2) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Negative pressure irrigation and PUI promoted better cleaning of main and simulated lateral canals.

Clinical significance

Conventional manual irrigation technique may promote less root canal cleaning in the apical third. For this reason, the search for other irrigation protocols is important, and EndoVac and PUI are alternatives to contribute to irrigation effectiveness.

How to cite this article

Tanomaru-Filho M, Miano LM, Chávez-Andrade GM, Torres FFE, de Toledo RL, Guerreir-Tanomaru JM. Cleaning of Root Canal System by Different Irrigation Methods. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(11):859-863.


PDF Share
  1. Effect of passive ultrasonic irrigation on enterococcus faecalis from root canals: an ex vivo study. Braz Dent J 2015;26:342-346.
  2. Effect of ultrasonics on Enterococcus faecalis biofilm in a bovine tooth model. J Endod 2011;37:1128-1133.
  3. Comparison of the effect of two endodontic irrigation protocols on the elimination of bacteria from root canal system: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Endod 2012;38:1479-1483.
  4. Qualitative analysis of the removal of the smear layer in the apical third of curved roots: conventional irrigation versus activation systems. J Endod 2011;37:1268-1271.
  5. In vitro comparison of passive and continuous ultrasonic irrigation in simulated lateral canals of extracted teeth. J Endod 2012;38:688-691.
  6. Irrigants in endodontic treatment. Int J Contemp Dent Medical Reviews 2015; [Epub ahead of print]: ID 030515.
  7. To evaluate the effect of two passive ultrasonic irrigation methods on removal of dentin debris from root canal systems using computational fluid dynamics study model. Int J Contemp Dent Medical Reviews 2014; [Epub ahead of print]: ID 011214.
  8. Effects of various irrigation/ aspiration protocols on cleaning of flattened root canals. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29. pii: S1806-83242015000100277. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2015. vol29.0082. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
  9. Determination of root canal cleanliness by different irrigation methods and morphometric analysis of apical third. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16:442-450.
  10. Efficacy of ultrasonic cleaning. J Endod 1980;6:740-743.
  11. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: a review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007;40:415-426.
  12. Acoustic hypochlorite activation in simulated curved canals. J Endod 2009;35:1408-1411.
  13. Synergistic effect of microbubble emulsion and sonic or ultrasonic agitation on endodontic biofilm in vitro. J Endod 2012;38:1530-1534.
  14. Root canal debridement efficacy of different final irrigation protocols. Int Endod J 2012;45:898-906.
  15. Irrigation in endodontics. Dent Clin North Am 2010;54:291-312.
  16. Efficacy of different final irrigation activation techniques on smear layer removal. J Endod 2011; 37:1272-1275.
  17. J Endod 2012;38:838-841.
  18. Antibacterial potential of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in distinct irrigation protocols on enterococcus faecalis biofilm. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16:340-346.
  19. Comparison of efficacy of various root canal irrigation systems in removal of smear layer generated at apical third: an SEM study. J Conserv Dent 2015;18:252-256.
  20. Comparison of the debridement efficacy of the EndoVac irrigation system and conventional needle root canal irrigation in vivo. J Endod 2010;36:1782-1785.
  21. Comparison of the cleaning efficacy of a new apical negative pressure irrigating system with conventional irrigation needles in the root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:479-484.
  22. Radiographic evaluation of root canal cleaning, main and laterals, using different methods of final irrigation. Rev Odontol UNESP 2014;43:333-337.
  23. Effectiveness of gutta-percha and Resilon in filling lateral root canals using the Obtura II system. Braz Oral Res 2011;25:205-209.
  24. In vitro analysis of thermocompaction time and gutta-percha type on quality of main canal and lateral canals filling. Braz Oral Res 2010;24:290-295.
  25. Necrotic pulp tissue dissolution by passive ultrasonic irrigation in simulated accessory canals: impact of canal location and angulation. Int Endod J 2009;42:59-65.
  26. Efficacy of four irrigation needles in cleaning the apical third of root canals. Braz Dent J 2013;24:21-24.
  27. Ex vivo assessment of irrigant penetration and renewal during the cleaning and shaping of root canals: a digital subtraction radiographic study. Int Endod J 2010;43:275-282.
  28. Influence of apical foramen diameter, design and penetration depth of the needle and irrigating solution flow rate on cleaning and apical extrusion. Rev Odontol UNESP 2014;43:91-97.
  29. Ex vivo comparison of digital images with conventional radiographs for detection of simulated voids in root canal filling material. Int Endod J 2006;39:287-292.
  30. Comparison of apical extrusion of NaOCl using the EndoVac or needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 2010;36:338-341.
  31. Comparative evaluation of canal isthmus debridement efficacy of modified EndoVac technique with different irrigation systems. J Endod 2014;40:1676-1680.
  32. Comparison of debris removal with three different irrigation techniques. J Endod 2011;37:1301-1305.
  33. Comparison of Endovac irrigation system with conventional irrigation for removal of intracanal smear layer: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:407-411.
  34. Debris and smear removal in flattened root canals after use of different irrigant agitation protocols. Microsc Res Tech 2012;75:781-790.
  35. Effect of rotary instrument associated with different irrigation techniques on removing calcium hydroxide dressing. Microsc Res Tech 2014;77:642-646.
  36. Irrigation of the apical root canal. Endod Topics 2013;27:54-73.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.