The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Patient Preferences in Selecting a Dentist: Survey Results from the Urban Population of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

Anil Sukumaran, Sajith Vellappally, Sahar Bin Huraib, Nadia Al Nahas, Hana O Al-Balbeesi, Faida Moawia Abu-Aljadayl

Citation Information : Sukumaran A, Vellappally S, Huraib SB, Nahas NA, Al-Balbeesi HO, Abu-Aljadayl FM. Patient Preferences in Selecting a Dentist: Survey Results from the Urban Population of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (3):201-204.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1661

Published Online: 01-03-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Awareness of gender- or nationality-driven preconceptions can help dentists to have a better interpretation of the dentist-patient relationship. It is even more noteworthy to understand these predilections in Saudi society, where women and men are usually segregated due to religion- and culturebased considerations. This study is one of the first to explore the preferences of patients when selecting a dentist with respect to gender and nationality in the city of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods

A total of 445 community residents residing in Riyadh were randomly selected for a cross-sectional study. The participants completed a survey designed to assess which of two factors (gender and/or nationality) were perceived as most relevant in choosing a dentist. Statistical analysis of the data was performed using the SPSS 11.5 software.

Results

Female participants did not show any preference for the gender of the dentist, whereas 40% of the male participants preferred a male dentist. Participants also favored male dentists in the fields of oral surgery (78.9%), implants (74.1%), endodontics (67.5%), orthodontics (65.8%) and prosthodontics (64.2%). An exception was noted in pediatric dentistry, for which female dentists were favored by 52.8% of the participants. Additionally, most (66.1%) participants did not have any preference for the nationality of the dentist.

Conclusion

Riyadh residents showed a general preference for a male dentist but demonstrated no preference for nationality when selecting a dentist.

How to cite this article

Huraib SB, Al Nahas N, Al-Balbeesi HO, Abu-Aljadayl FM, Vellappally S, Sukumaran A. Patient Preferences in Selecting a Dentist: Survey Results from the Urban Population of Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(3): 201-204.


PDF Share
  1. Patient satisfaction as an indicator of quality care. Inquiry 1988. p. 25-36.
  2. Patient satisfaction with primary medical care. Evaluation of sociodemographic and predispositional factors. Med Care 1988;26(4):383-392.
  3. Dental patients’ perceptions in a multiethnic environment. J Calif Dent Assoc 1995;23(12):77-80.
  4. The effect of patient race and socioeconomic status on physicians’ perceptions of patients. Soc Sci Med 2000;50(6):813-828.
  5. Video study of physician selection: preferences in the face of diversity. J Fam Pract 2003;52(7):552-559.
  6. The influence of practitioner nationality, experience, and sex in shaping patient preferences for dentists. Int Dent J 2011;61(4):193-198.
  7. Gender-segregated education in Saudi Arabia: its impact on social norms and the Saudi labor market. Education Policy Analysis Archives 2004;12(28):n28.
  8. Communication in medical encounters: an ecological perspective. Handbook of Health Communication 2003. p. 63-89.
  9. Patient-centered care: the influence of patient and resident physician gender and gender concordance in primary care. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012;21(3): 326-333.
  10. Analysing post-apartheid gender and racial transformation in medical education in a South African province. Glob Health Action 2013;6:19810.
  11. Race, gender, and partnership in the patientphysician relationship. JAMA 1999;282(6):583-589.
  12. The implications of gender stereotypes for the dentist-patient relationship. J Dent Educ 2008;72(5):562-570.
  13. Patients’ perceptions of general dental practitioners: the influence of ethnicity and sex of dentist. Social Behavior and Personality Int J 2001;29(6):601-606.
  14. Gender and relationships: a developmental account. Am Psychol 1990;45(4):513-520.
  15. The impact of the doctor's gender on the doctor-patient relationship in a Saudi obstetric and gynaecology clinic. Saudi Med J 1994;15(6):450-455.
  16. Patients’ choice of general practitioner: importance of patients’ and doctors’ sex and ethnicity. Br J Gen Pract 1991;41(349):330-331.
  17. Sex of physician: patients’ preferences and stereotypes. J Fam Pract 1990;30(4):441-446.
  18. Assessment of the feelings and attitudes of children towards their dentist and their association with oral health. ISRN Dent 2014;2014:867234.
  19. Strategies for combating dental anxiety. J Dent Educ 2004;68(11):1172-1177.
  20. Advancement of women in dental education: trends and strategies. J Dent Educ 2003;67(1):79-83.
  21. Does race have an influence on patients’ feelings toward physicians? J Fam Pract 1981;13(3):383-387.
  22. Participants’ ratings of male physicians who vary in race and communication style. Psychol Rep 2002;91(3 Pt 1):793-806.
  23. Patients’ perspectives of the doctor-patient relationship and information giving across a range of literacy levels. Patient Educ Couns 2009;75(1):114-120.
  24. Addressing patient beliefs and expectations in the consultation. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2010;24(2):219-225.
  25. Doctor and patient perceptions of the level of doctor explanation and quality of patient-doctor communication. Scand J Caring Sci 2006;20(2):143-150.
  26. Patient preference for a racially or genderconcordant student dentist. J Dent Educ 2007;71(6):726-745.
  27. Disentangling physician sex and physician communication style: their effects on patient satisfaction in a virtual medical visit. Patient Educ Couns 2007;68(1):16-22.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.