The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2015 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Resilon: Review of a New Material for Obturation of the Canal

Hamid Jafarzadeh, Zahed Mohammadi, Sousan Shalavi, Jun-Ichiro Kinoshita

Citation Information : Jafarzadeh H, Mohammadi Z, Shalavi S, Kinoshita J. Resilon: Review of a New Material for Obturation of the Canal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (5):407-414.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1698

Published Online: 01-05-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

How to cite this article

Mohammadi Z, Jafarzadeh H, Shalavi S, Bhandi S, Kinoshita J-I. Resilon: Review of a New Material for Obturation of the Canal. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(5): 407-414.


PDF Share
  1. Endodontic materials. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51(3):695-712.
  2. Resilon™: A novel material to replace gutta-percha. Oral Health 2004.
  3. An evaluation of microbial leakage in roots filled with a thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based root canal filling material (Resilon). J Endod 2004;30(5):342-347.
  4. Ultrastructural evaluation of the apical seal in roots filled with a polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2005;31(7):514-519.
  5. J Endod 2006;32(4):324-327.
  6. Comparative analysis of microleakage and seal for 2 obturation materials: Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72(3):245.
  7. A fluid filtration comparison of gutta-percha versus Resilon, a new soft resin endodontic obturation system. J Endod 2006;32(7):642-645.
  8. An in vitro assessment of the sealing ability of Resilon/epiphany using fluid filtration. J Endod 2006;32(8):759-761.
  9. Evaluation of dye penetration test versus bacterial microleakage test to determine sealing ability of root canal filling materials. SADJ 2007;62(7):306-308.
  10. The apical sealing ability of a new root canal filling material. Am J Dent 2007;20(5):295-298.
  11. An in vitro evaluation of the apical sealing ability of a new resin-based root canal obturation system. J Endod 2006;32(10):976-978.
  12. Glucose reactivity with filling materials as a limitation for using the glucose leakage model. Int Endod J 2008;41(10):869-872.
  13. Enterococcus faecalis type strain leakage through root canals filled with Gutta- Percha/AH plus or Resilon/Epiphany. J Endod 2007;33(1):45-47.
  14. An evaluation of the sealing ability of MTA and Resilon: a bacterial leakage study. Iran Endod J 2007;2(2):43-46.
  15. Microbial leakage of gutta-percha and Resilon root canal filling material: a comparative study using a new homogeneous assay for sequence detection. J Biomater Appl 2008;22(4):337-352.
  16. Negative influence of continuous wave technique on apical sealing of the root canal system with Resilon. J Oral Sci 2007;49(2):121-128.
  17. Apical sealing ability of Resilon/Epiphany versus gutta-percha/AH Plus: immediate and 16-months leakage. Int Endod J 2007;40(9):722-729.
  18. Reduced long-term sealing ability of adhesive root fillings after water-storage stress. J Endod 2008;34(3):322-325.
  19. Coronal sealing ability of a new root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc 2007;73(7):623.
  20. Evaluation of the quality of the apical seal in Resilon/ Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus-filled root canals by using a fluid filtration approach. J Endod 2007;33(8):944-947.
  21. Evaluation of the sealing ability of gutta-percha and thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based systems along the root canals through the glucose penetration model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(6):e66-73.
  22. An in vitro comparison of microleakage between Resilon and gutta-percha with a fluid filtration model. J Endod 2007;33(12):1447-1449.
  23. Significance of moist root canal dentin with the use of methacrylate-based endodontic sealers: an in vitro coronal dye leakage study. J Endod 2008;34(1):76-79.
  24. Comparison of regrowth of Enterococcus faecalis in dentinal tubules after sealing with gutta-percha or Resilon. J Endod 2008;34(4):445-448.
  25. In vitro comparison of coronal microleakage between Resilon alone and gutta-percha with a glass-ionomer intraorifice barrier using a fluid filtration model. J Endod 2008;34(6):718-720.
  26. Comparative assessment of ActiV GP/glass ionomer sealer, Resilon/Epiphany, and gutta-percha/AH plus obturation: a bacterial leakage study. J Endod 2008;34(6):725-727.
  27. Regional push-out bond strength and coronal microleakage of Resilon after different light-curing methods. J Endod 2007;33(12):1464-1468.
  28. Coronal and apical leakage analysis of two different root canal obturation systems. Braz Oral Res 2008;22(3):211-215.
  29. Apical leakage of epiphany root canal sealer combined with different master cones. Eur J Dent 2008;2(2):91-95.
  30. Resin-based versus gutta-percha-based root canal obturation: influence on bacterial leakage in an in vitro model system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;108(2):292-296.
  31. Long-term evaluation of the sealing ability of two root canal sealers in combination with self-etching bonding agents. J Adhes Dent 2009;11(3):239-246.
  32. Comparative analysis of leakage in root canal fillings performed with gutta-percha and Resilon cones with AH Plus and Epiphany sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(2):e131-135.
  33. Effect of chlorhexidine on coronal microleakage from root canals obturated with Resilon/Epiphany Self-Etch. J Oral Sci 2010;52(1):83-87.
  34. Microleakage of various root filling systems by glucose filtration analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109(6):e96-102.
  35. Ex vivo evaluation of coronal and apical microbial leakage of root canal╌filled with gutta-percha or Resilon/Epiphany root canal filling material. Indian J Dent Res 2010;21(1):98-103.
  36. Long-term sealing ability of resin-based root canal fillings. Int Endod J 2010;43(6):455-460.
  37. Active versus passive microleakage of Resilon/Epiphany and gutta-percha/AH Plus. Aust Endod J 2011;37(3):141-146.
  38. The effect of irrigation solutions on the apical sealing ability in different root canal sealers. Braz Oral Res 2010;24(2):165-169.
  39. Comparison of the single cone and cold lateral compaction techniques in sealing 0.04 taper root canal preparations. Gen Dent 2010;58(5):e219-222.
  40. The comparison of microbial leakage in roots filled with resilon and gutta-percha: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(1):21-27.
  41. An in vitro assessment of apical microleakage in root canals obturated with guttaflow, Resilon, thermafil and lateral condensation: A stereomicroscopic study. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(2):173-177.
  42. Microleakage of root canal fillings with GuttaFlow and Resilon compared with lateral condensation. Wien Med Wochenschr 2010;160(9-10):230-234.
  43. Bacterial leakage of GuttaFlow-filled root canals compared with Resilon/Epiphany and Gutta-percha/AH26- filled root canals. Aust Endod J 2012;38(1):10-13.
  44. Effect of intracanal medicament on the sealing ability of root canals filled with Resilon. J Endod 2006;32(6):532-536.
  45. Microbial leakage of Gutta-Percha and Resilon root canal filling material: a comparative study using a new homogeneous assay for sequence detection. J Biomater Appl 2008;22(4):337-352.
  46. Fracture resistance of roots endodontically treated with a new resin filling material. J Am Dent Assoc 2004;135(5):646-652.
  47. Reinforcement of immature roots with a new resin filling material. J Endod 2006;32(4):350-353.
  48. Resistance to fracture of roots filled with three different techniques. Int Endod J 2007;40(1):31-35.
  49. Fracture resistance of simulated immature teeth filled with resilon, gutta-percha, or composite. J Endod 2007;33(4):480-483.
  50. Effect of new obturating materials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Endod 2007;33(6):732-736.
  51. Effect of different root canal sealers on fracture strength of simulated immature roots. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112(4):544-547.
  52. Influence of different root canal-filling materials on the mechanical properties of root canal dentin. J Endod 2007;33(7):859-863.
  53. Influence of different endodontic filling materials on root fracture susceptibility. J Dent 2008;36(1):69-73.
  54. Evaluation of fracture resistance in simulated immature teeth using Resilon and Ribbond as root reinforcements—an in vitro study. Dent Traumatol 2009;25(4):433-438.
  55. An in vitro comparative evaluation of depth of tubular penetration of three resin-based root canal sealers. J Conserv Dent 2012;15(1):18-21.
  56. Effects of new adhesive resin root canal filling materials on vertical root fractures. Aust Endod J 2010;36(1):19-23.
  57. Fracture resistance of teeth obturated with gutta percha and Resilon: an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent 2010;13(2):61-64.
  58. In vitro resistance to fracture of roots obturated with Resilon or gutta-percha. J Endod 2011;37(6):828-831.
  59. Efficacy of retreatment techniques for a resin-based root canal obturation material. J Endod 2006;32(4):341-344.
  60. Comparison between gutta-percha and Resilon removal using two different techniques in endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2006;32(4):362-364.
  61. Retreatment efficacy of the Epiphany soft resin obturation system. Int Endod J 2007;40(8):633-643.
  62. In vitro evaluation of the cleansing working time and analysis of the amount of gutta-percha or Resilon remnants in the root canal walls after instrumentation for endodontic retreatment. J Endod 2007;33(12):1426-1428.
  63. Comparative study of removal of current endodontic fillings. J Endod 2008;34(3):326-329.
  64. Removal of resinbased root canal filling materials with K3 rotary instruments: relative efficacy for different combinations of filling materials. Dent Mater J 2008;27(1):75-80.
  65. The effectiveness of manual and mechanical instrumentation for the retreatment of three different root canal filling materials. J Endod 2008;34(4):466-469.
  66. The comparison of gutta-percha and Resilon penetration into lateral canals with different thermoplastic delivery systems. J Endod 2008;34(7):847-849.
  67. Efficacy of 3 techniques in removing root canal filling material. J Can Dent Assoc 2008;74(8):p721.
  68. Comparison between gutta-percha and Resilon retreatment. J Oral Sci 2009;51(2):181-185.
  69. The efficacy of R-Endo rotary NiTi and stainless-steel hand instruments to remove guttapercha and Resilon. Int Endod J 2010;43(2):135-141.
  70. Solvent capacity of different substances on gutta-percha and Resilon. Braz Dent J 2010;21(1):46-49.
  71. Efficacy of three different rotary files to remove gutta-percha and Resilon from root canals. Int Endod J 2010;43(11):1022-1028.
  72. Effectiveness of three solvents and two associations of solvents on gutta-percha and Resilon. Braz Dent J 2011;22(1):41-44.
  73. A comparison of the effectiveness of chloroform in dissolving Resilon and guttapercha. J Dent (Tehran) 2011;8(1):19-24.
  74. Short-term cytotoxicity assessment of components of the epiphany resin-percha obturating system by indirect and direct contact millipore filter assays. J Endod 2007;33(1):24-27.
  75. In vivo evaluation of the biocompatibility of a new resin-based obturation system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(3):e60-66.
  76. The response of subcutaneous connective tissue to a new endodontic filling material. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;84(2):463-467.
  77. J Endod 2007;33(11):1299-1303.
  78. Cytotoxicity evaluation of Activ GP and Resilon sealers in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107(6):e74-78.
  79. Comparative study of the cytotoxic effect of Resilon against two cell lines. Braz Dent J 2008;19(4):291-295.
  80. Biocompatibility evaluation of Epiphany/ Resilon root canal filling system in subcutaneous tissue of rats. J Endod 2010;36(1):110-114.
  81. The antimicrobial and antifungal activity of a root canal core material. J Am Dent Assoc 2007;138(9):1228-1232.
  82. Residual effects and surface alterations in disinfected gutta-percha and Resilon cones. J Endod 2007;33(8):948-951.
  83. Influence of endodontic irrigants on resin sealer bond strength to radicular dentin. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll 2012;53(1):1-7.
  84. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus, Epiphany, and Epiphany SE root canal sealers. Int Endod J 2009;42(9):785-793.
  85. Shear bond strength of AH-26 and Epiphany to composite resin and Resilon. J Endod 2008;34(11):1385-1387.
  86. Interfacial st rength of Resilon and g utta-percha to intraradicular dentin. J Endod 2005;31(11):809-813.
  87. An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of Resilon and gutta-percha. J Endod 2006;32(10):963-966.
  88. New endodontic obturation systems and their interfacial bond strength with intraradicular dentine - ex vivo studies. Adv Med Sci 2011;56(2):327-333.
  89. An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design. J Endod 2007;33(7):856-858.
  90. Push-out bond strength of a new endodontic obturation system (Resilon/ Epiphany). J Endod 2007;33(2):160-162.
  91. Micropush-out bond strengths of gutta-percha versus thermoplastic synthetic polymer-based s ystems—an e x v ivo s tudy. I nt E ndod J 2008;41(3):211-218.
  92. Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha. Int Endod J 2006;39(8):643-647.
  93. Bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany compared with Gutta-percha and sealers Sealer 26 and Endo Fill. Aust Endod J 2012;38(1):21-25.
  94. Effect of various endodontic solutions on punch out strength of Resilon under cyclic loading. J Conserv Dent 2011;14(4):366-369.
  95. Pushout bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany self-etch and guttapercha/ AH26 after different irrigation protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110(5):e88-92.
  96. Soft chelating irrigation protocol optimizes bonding quality of Resilon/ Epiphany root fillings. J Endod 2008;34(6):703-705.
  97. Push-out bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany self-etch to intraradicular dentin after retreatment: a preliminary study. J Endod 2010;36(3):493-496.
  98. Comparison of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, MTAD, and 2% chlorhexidine in the rapid disinfection of polycaprolactone-based root canal filling material. J Endod 2007;33(1):42-44.
  99. Disinfection of artificially contaminated Resilon cones with chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite at different time exposures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(3):e82-85.
  100. Efficacy of different concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine in disinfection of contaminated Resilon cones. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012;17(2):e352-355.
  101. Influence of immediate and delayed post space preparation on sealing ability of resilon. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;103(6):e61-64.
  102. Comparison of coronal bacterial leakage between immediate versus delayed post-space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon/Epiphany. Int Endod J 2009;42(3):203-207.
  103. Sealing properties of one-step root-filling fibre postobturators vs two-step delayed fibre post-placement. J Dent 2010;38(7):547-552.
  104. A laboratory comparison of apical leakage between immediate versus delayed post space preparation in root canals filled with Resilon. Int Endod J 2010;43(9): 775-781.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.