The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2015 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Nd:Yag Laser to obtain Irregularities on the Inner Surface of Porcelain

Mateus Rodrigues Tonetto, Edson Alves de Campos, Matheus Coelho Bandéca, Betina Grehs Porto, Thiago Soares Porto, Shilpa H Bhandi, Monica Barros da Silva, Sizenando de Toledo Porto-Neto, Welingtom Dinelli

Citation Information : Tonetto MR, de Campos EA, Bandéca MC, Porto BG, Porto TS, Bhandi SH, da Silva MB, de Toledo Porto-Neto S, Dinelli W. Nd:Yag Laser to obtain Irregularities on the Inner Surface of Porcelain. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (6):451-457.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1705

Published Online: 01-06-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to evaluate the inner surface of two ceramic systems: IPS Empress II (Ivoclar Vivadent, Germany) and In-Ceram Alumina (Vita Zahnfabrick, Germany) submitted to surface treatments, especially by Nd:YAG laser.

Materials and methods

Fifty samples were prepared in pellet form for each ceramic system according to manufacturers’ specifications. The samples were stored at room temperature and then be subjected to surface treatment: without treatment (T0) (control), hydrofluoric acid-etched (T1), hydrofluoric acidetched associated with the airborne particle-abraded (T2); CoJet system (T3), Nd:YAG laser (T4). The data were performed the statistical analysis by ANOVA and Tukey's test (p < 0.001).

Results

The group control (T0) of the ceramics, the analysis showed the lowest roughness values; for the System Alumina In-Ceram, treatment with hydrofluoric acid (T1), associated with hydrofluoric acid and airborne particle-abraded (T2) and Nd:YAG laser (T4), had no statistically significant difference, whereas for the IPS Empress System II treatment with hydrofluoric acid (T1) and hydrofluoric acid associated with airborne particle-abraded (T2), had no statistically significant difference between the system and also CoJet (T3) and hydrofluoric acid associated with the airborne particle-abraded (T2). Photomicrographs of scanning electron microscopy showed different characteristics to the treatments for each ceramic system.

Conclusion

The IPS Empress II had the appearance of favoring the retention when treated with hydrofluoric acid, as well as its association with the airborne particle-abraded. Uncertainty in Alumina, treatment with hydrofluoric acid associated with the airborne particle-abraded and CoJet system and provided a surface with irregularities. With respect to the laser further studies should be performed for parameters that are ideal for your application.

Clinical relevance

The ceramic restorations are attractive due of their excellent esthetics and the ability to stay for long periods. However, the retention of ceramic requires further study.

How to cite this article

Porto TS, Porto BG, de Campos EA, de Toledo Porto-Neto S, da Silva MB, Bhandi SH, Tonetto MR, Dinelli W, Bandeca MC. Nd:Yag Laser to obtain Irregularities on the Inner Surface of Porcelain. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(6):451-457.


PDF Share
  1. Effect of etching and airborne particle abrasion on the microstructure of different dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2003 May;89(5):479-488.
  2. Effects of Er, Cr:YSGG laser irradiation on external adaptation of restorations in caries-affected cavities. Laser Phys Lett 2013 Sep;10(9):095601.
  3. Effect of etchant, etching period, and silane priming on bond strength to porcelain of composite resin. Oper Dent 1998 Sep-Oct;23(5):250-257.
  4. Effect of different etching periods on the bond strength of a composite resin to a machinable porcelain. J Dent 1998 Jan;26(1):53-58.
  5. Surface energy of etched ceramic. Int J Prosthodont 1999 Sep-Oct;12(5):415-418.
  6. Influence of Er:YAG laser on surface treatment of aged composite resin to repair restoration. Laser Phys 2009 Nov;19(11):2144-2149.
  7. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater 2003 Dec;19(8):725-731.
  8. Y-TZP ceramics: key concepts for clinical application. Oper Dent 2009 May-Jun;34(3):344-351.
  9. Failure analysis of resin composite bonded to ceramic. Dent Mater 2003 Dec;19(8):693-699.
  10. Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to all-ceramic materials. J Oral Rehabil 2003 Jul;30(7):758-764.
  11. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003 May;123(5):540-546.
  12. Overlays or ceramic fragments for tooth restoration: an analysis of fracture resistance. J Contemp Dent Pract 2014 Jan 1;15(1):56-60.
  13. Long-term resin bonding to zirconia ceramic with a new universal primer. J Prosthet Dent 2011 Nov;106(5):319-327.
  14. Effect of different ceramic surface treatments on resin microtensile bond strength. J Prosthodont 2004 Mar;13(1):28-35.
  15. Durability of resin cement bond to aluminium oxide and zirconia ceramics after air abrasion and laser treatment. J Prosthodont 2011 Feb;20(2):84-92.
  16. Effects of the Nd:YAG laser, air-abrasion, and acid-etchant on filling materials. J Oral Rehabil 2006 Jan;33(1):64-69.
  17. Effect of silica coating and silanization on flexural and composite-resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2006 Mar;95(3):224-249.
  18. The influence of ceramic surface treatments on the tensile bond strength of composite resin to all-ceramic coping materials. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Oct;94(4):357-362.
  19. The effect of ceramic surface treatment on bonding to densely sintered alumina ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Mar;93(3):253-259.
  20. Porcelain surface treatment by laser for bracket-porcelain bonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 Nov;128(5):630-637.
  21. Influence of surface and heat treatments on the flexural strength of a glass-infiltrated alumina/zirconia-reinforced dental ceramic. Dent Mater 2005 May;21(5):454-463.
  22. Elham Surface treatment of feldspathic porcelain: scanning electron microscopy analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2014 Oct;6(5):387-394.
  23. Fracture strength of three all-ceramic systems: Top-Ceram compared with IPS-Empress and In- Ceram. J Contemp Dent Pract 2012 Mar 1;13(2):210-215.
  24. Fracture resistance of aluminium oxide and lithium disilicatebased crowns using different luting cements: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009 Mar 1;10(2):51-58.
  25. Surface treatment protocols in the cementation process of ceramic and laboratory-processed composite restorations: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17(4):224-35. Review.
  26. Effect of porcelain surface treatments on bond strengths of composite resin bonded to porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 1994 Oct;72(4):355-359.
  27. Effects of surface treatments on shear bond strengths between a resin cement and an alumina core. J Prosthet Dent 2000 Jun;83(6):644-647.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.