The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 16 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2015 ) > List of Articles

REVIEW ARTICLE

Pulpotomy Medicaments used in Deciduous Dentition: An Update

Yousef H Al-Dlaigan

Citation Information : Al-Dlaigan YH. Pulpotomy Medicaments used in Deciduous Dentition: An Update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015; 16 (6):486-503.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1711

Published Online: 01-11-2015

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2015; The Author(s).


Abstract

How to cite this article

Al-Dlaigan YH. Pulpotomy Medicaments used in Deciduous Dentition: An Update. J Contemp Dent Pract 2015;16(6):486-503.


PDF Share
  1. Bioactive materials in conservative dentistry. International Journal of Contemporary Dental and Medical Reviews 2015, Article ID: 340115, 2015. doi: 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.47.
  2. Principles of dental surgery; 1826.
  3. The effect of zinc oxideeugenol cement on a formocresolized pulp. ASDC J Dentistry for Children 1966;33(6):381-396.
  4. Pulp healing. J Dent Res 1949;28(2):97-107.
  5. The chemistry of pulp decomposition, with a rational treatment for this condition and its sequelae. Amer Dent J 1904;3:764-771.
  6. Root-canal treatment in deciduous teeth, including pulp exposure. Pacific Dent Gaz 1923;31:718-721.
  7. Procedure for treatment of exposed and pulpless deciduous teeth*. Journal of the American Dental Association 1930;17(6):1150-1153.
  8. Pulp amputation as a method of treating root canals. D Items Int 1929;51:596.
  9. The Pulpless Deciduous Teeth*. Journal of the American Dental Association 1936;23(11):2057-2065.
  10. Is Vital Pulpotomy Worthwhile? ASDC J Dent Child 1953;20:38-40.
  11. Devitalizing technic for pulpotomy in primary molars. ASDC J Dent Child 1956;23(1st quart):45.
  12. Effects of paraformaldehyde preparations on the periapical tissues in non-vital pulpotomy procedures. Chicago: Northwestern University; 1958.
  13. Effects of formocresol on the dental pulp. ASDC J Dent Child 1959;26(1):277-297.
  14. Pulpal changes following formocresol applications on rat molars and human primary teeth. JS Calif Dent Assoc 1959;27:309-323.
  15. A histologic study of the effects of formocresol on normal primary pulpal tissue: MS thesis. University of Washington, Seattle; 1961.
  16. A comparison of the formocresol pulpotomy technique with the calcium hydroxide pulpotomy technique. 1961.
  17. Formocresol versus calcium hydroxide in pulpotomy. ASDC J Dent Child 1962;29(2):86-97.
  18. The effect of formocresol and calcium hydroxide on the dental pulps of Rhesus monkeys. 1963.
  19. A comparison and evaluation of two formocresol pulpotomy technics utilizing ‘Buckley's’ formocresol. ASDC J Dent Child 1968;35(1):22-30.
  20. The effect of formocresol on hamster connective tissue cells, a histologic and quantitative radioautographic study with proline-H 3. Archives of Oral Biology 1968;13(3):271-IN215.
  21. Clinical evaluation of pulpotomies using dilute formocresol. ASDC J of Dent Child 1974;42(5):360-363.
  22. Clinical evaluation of diluted formocresol pulpotomies in primary teeth of school children. Pediatr Dent 1981;3(4):321-324.
  23. Formocresol technique. Paper presented at: Transactions of the Third International Conference on Endodontics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 1963.
  24. Formocresol pulpotomy in deciduous teeth. J Am Dent Assoc 1964;69:601-607.
  25. Pulp tissue reaction to formocresol and zinc oxideeugenol. ASDC J Dent Child 1965;32:13-28.
  26. A 3-year clinical follow-up study of pulpotomized primary molars treated with the formocresol technique. Scand J Dent Res 1975;83(2):47-53.
  27. Therapeutic pulpotomies in primary molars with the formocresol technique. A clinical and histological follow-up. Acta Odontol Scand 1978;36(3):157-165.
  28. Pulpotomy of primary molars with coronal or total pulpitis using formocresol technique. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1979;87(3):208-216.
  29. Pulpotomy in primary molars: long-term clinical and histological evaluation. Int Endodon J 1980;13(3):143-155.
  30. Direct pulp capping and partial pulpotomy with diluted formocresol in primary molars. Acta Odontol Pediatr 1984;5(2):57-61.
  31. Formocresol pulpotomies in primary molars: a radiographic study in a pediatric dentistry practice. The Journal of pedodontics 1985;10(4):331-339.
  32. Formocresol and glutaraldehyde pulpotomies in primary teeth. The Journal of pedodontics 1988;13(4):314-322.
  33. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Pediatric dentistry 1990;13(6):327-332.
  34. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: longterm follow up. Pediatric Dentistry 1996;19(5):327-330.
  35. Clinical studies on ferric sulphate as a pulpotomy medicament in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2002;3(3):126-132.
  36. Ferric sulphate and formocresol in pulpotomy of primary molars: long term follow-up study. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2003;4(1):28-32.
  37. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol as pulpcapping agents in pulpotomized primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry 2004;26(4):302-309.
  38. Success rate of formocresol pulpotomy versus mineral trioxide aggregate in human primary molar tooth. J Research in Medical Sciences 2004;9(6):304-307.
  39. Effectiveness of 4 pulpotomy techniques—randomized controlled trial. Journal of dental research 2005;84(12):1144-1148.
  40. Evaluation of three pulpotomy medicaments in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2005;6(3):133-138.
  41. Success of mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;29(4):307-311.
  42. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent 2005;27(2):129-136.
  43. Mineral trioxide aggregate as a pulpotomy agent in primary molars: an in vivo study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 2005;23(1):13.
  44. Randomized controlled trial of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol for pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int Endod J 2007;40(4):261-267.
  45. Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp capping agent for primary teeth pulpotomy: 2 year follow up study. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2009;33(4):311-314.
  46. Comparing gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized human primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2010;32(5):393-399.
  47. Mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth: a 2-year follow-up. Int Endod J 2010;43(5):413-418.
  48. Comparative investigation of clinical/radiographical signs of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol on pulpotomized primary molars. Contemp Clin Dent 2010;1(3):146-151.
  49. Comparison of three pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomised clinical trial. Iranian endodontic journal 2011;6(1):11.
  50. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24 month study. Pediatr Dent 2011;33(2):165-170.
  51. Effects of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol on vital pulp after pulpotomy of primary molars: An in vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent 2011;2(4):296-301.
  52. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate as pulpotomy agents in deciduous teeth. Indian J Dent Res 2011;22(3):385-390.
  53. Comparison of gray mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a 6- to 24-month observation. Pediatr Dent 2012;34(5):120-128.
  54. Comparative evaluation of formocresol and mineral trioxide aggregate in pulpotomized primary molars—2-year follow-up. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;37(2):143-147.
  55. Long-term effectiveness of four pulpotomy techniques: 3 year randomised controlled trial. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16(4):1243-1250.
  56. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and diluted formocresol in pulpotomized human primary molars: 42-month follow-up and survival analysis. Pediatr Dent 2013;35(3):E87-94.
  57. Clinical and radiographic evaluation of pulpotomies in primary molars with formocresol, glutaraldehyde and ferric sulphate. Oral Health Dent Manag 2013;12(1):24-31.
  58. Evaluation and comparison of white mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol medicaments in primary tooth pulpotomy: clinical and radiographic study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2014;32(1):13-18.
  59. Evaluation of formocresol, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulfate, and MTA primary molar pulpotomies. Eur J Dent 2014;8(2):234-240.
  60. In vivo evaluation of the treatment outcome of pulpotomy in primary molars using diode laser, formocresol, and ferric sulphate. Photomed Laser Surg 2014;32(5):289-295.
  61. Effect of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol pulpotomy on vital primary teeth: a clinical and radiographic study. Niger J Clin Pract 2015;18(2):292-296.
  62. Reactions of pulpotomized teeth to zinc oxide and formocresol-type drugs. ASDC J Dent Child 1972;39(4):298-307.
  63. A comparison between zinc oxide-eugenol and polycarboxylate cements on formocresol pulpotomies. The Journal of pedodontics 1982;6(3):203.
  64. Biological effects of formocresol. ASDC Journal of dentistry for children 1972;40(3):193-197.
  65. Distribution of 14 C-formaldehyde after pulpotomy with formocresol. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96(5):805-813.
  66. Systemic distribution of 14 C-formaldehyde from formocresol-treated pulpotomy sites. J Dent Res 1980;59(3):602-608.
  67. Pulp condition of successfully formocresol-treated primary molars. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1978;86(4):267-272.
  68. Relationship between formocresol pulpotomies on primary teeth and enamel defects on their permanent successors. The Journal of the American Dental Association 1977;94(4):698-700.
  69. Formocresol pulpotomy of primary teeth and occurrence of enamel defects on the permanent successors. Acta Odontol Scand 1978;36(4):243-247.
  70. Pulpotomy treatment in primary teeth. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1985;6(8):586-587,590-581.
  71. Formocresol: a root canal disinfectant provoking allergic skin reactions in presensitized guinea pigs. J Endod 1983;9(1):25-29.
  72. Allergy tests against formaldehyde, cresol, and eugenol in children with formocresol pulpotomized primary teeth. Scand J Dent Res 1976;84(5):345-347.
  73. Comparison of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of glutaraldehyde and formocresol. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991;71(1):89-95.
  74. A preliminary report on pulpotomy. Northwestern Dental Res and Grad Quart University Bulletin 1938;39(4):4-8.
  75. Reaction of the pulp to calcium hydroxide. Journal of Dental Research 1939;18(4):373-379.
  76. Evaluation of deciduous molars treated by pulpotomy and calcium hydroxide. Journal of the American Dental Association 1955;50(1):34-41.
  77. Therapeutic pulpotomy in primary molars— clinical and histological follow-up. I. Calcium hydroxide paste as wound dressing. Odontol Revy 1970;21(4):415-431.
  78. On internal dentine resorption in deciduous molars treated by pulpotomy and capped with calcium hydroxide. Odontol Revy 1971;22(2):179-188.
  79. Effect of an extra-pulpal blood clot on healing following experimental pulpotomy and capping with calcium hydroxide. Odontol Revy 1973;24(3):257-268.
  80. Early reaction of intact human teeth to calcium hydroxide following experimental pulpotomy and its significance to the development of hard tissue barrier. Odontol Revy 1971;22(4):379-395.
  81. Scanning electron microscopy of hard tissue barrier following experimental pulpotomy of intact human teeth and capping with calcium hydroxide. Odontol Revy 1972;23(2):211-220.
  82. Capping of the inflamed pulp. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1972;34(3):477-485.
  83. Agreement between clinical and histologic findings in chronic coronal pulpitis in primary teeth. European Journal of Oral Sciences 1977;85(7):583-587.
  84. A 2-year follow-up of primary molars, pulpotomized with a gentle technique and capped with calcium hydroxide. Scand J Dent Res 1978;86(4):273-278.
  85. A clinical report on partial pulpotomy and capping with calcium hydroxide in permanent incisors with complicated crown fracture. Journal of Endodontics 1978;4(8):232-237.
  86. Permeability of the hard tissue bridge formed after pulpotomy with calcium hydroxide: a histologic study. Journal of the American Dental Association 1979;99(3):472-475.
  87. Comparison of calcium hydroxide and formocresol pulpotomies in primary teeth in lambs: preliminary study. Journal of Endodontics 1987;13(7):328-335.
  88. Hard tissue barrier formation in pulpotomized monkey teeth capped with cyanoacrylate or calcium hydroxide for 10 and 60 minutes. Journal of Dental Research 1987;66(6):1166-1174.
  89. The effect of pulp capping and pulpotomy on hard tissue bridges of contaminated pulps. Int Endod J 1991;24(3):126-134.
  90. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy for primary teeth: a clinical study. Journal of the American Dental Association 1984;108(5):775-778.
  91. Effects of calcium hydroxide-containing pulpcapping agents on pulp cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation. Journal Dental Research 1985;64 Spec no:541-548.
  92. Some biochemical considerations of fixation in endodontics. Journal of Endodontics 1975;1:233-237.
  93. The biological uses and importance of glutaraldehyde. Prog Med Chem 1976;13:271-301.
  94. A biochemical study of two bifunctional reagents as alternatives to formocresol. Journal of Dental Research 1983;62(10):1054-1057.
  95. The effect of alternatives to formocresol on antigenicity of proteins. Journal of Dental Research 1985;64(10):1225-1228.
  96. Diffusion of formocresol and glutaraldehyde through dentin and cementum. Journal of Endodontics 1976;2(2):42-46.
  97. Diffusion of buffered glutaraldehyde and formocresol from pulpotomized primary teeth. ASDC journal of dentistry for children 1991;59(2):108-110.
  98. Clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde pulpotomies in primary teeth. Acta Odontol Pediatr 1983;4(2):41-44.
  99. Glutaraldehyde as a pulp dressing after pulpotomy in primary teeth of baboon monkeys. Pediatric Dentistry 1986;8(1):32-36.
  100. Systemic absorption of 14 C-glutaraldehyde from glutaraldehyde-treated pulpotomy sites. Pediatric Dentistry 1986;8(3):134-138.
  101. A 42 month clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde pulpotomies in primary teeth. The Journal of Pedodontics 1985;10(2):148-155.
  102. Assessment of a 2% buffered glutaraldehyde solution in pulpotomized primary teeth of school children: a preliminary report. The Journal of Pedodontics 1985;10(4):323-330.
  103. Assessment of a 2% buffered glutaraldehyde solution in pulpotomized primary teeth of schoolchildren. ASDC journal of dentistry for children 1989;57(5):371-375.
  104. Cytotoxicity of glutaraldehyde and formaldehyde in relation to time of exposure and concentration. Pediatric Dentistry 1990;12(5):303-307.
  105. Glutaraldehyde preparations and pulpotomy in primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993;76(3):346-350.
  106. Glutaraldehyde: an alternative to formocresol for vital pulp therapy. ASDC journal of dentistry for children 1981;49(3):176-180.
  107. The effects of glutaraldehyde on primary pulp tissue following coronal amputation: an in vivo histologic study. ASDC journal of dentistry for children 1980;47(6):425-430.
  108. Pulpal tissue changes following pulpotomies with formocresol, glutaraldehyde—calcium hydroxide, glutaraldehyde-zinc oxide eugenol pastes in primary teeth. The Journal of pedodontics 1988;13(2):123-132.
  109. Pulpal tissue reaction to buffered glutaraldehyde. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry 1991;16(2):101-106.
  110. Reviewing pulp treatment for primary teeth. Journal of the American Dental Association 1991;122(9):83-85.
  111. A critical look at glutaraldehyde. Pediatric Dentistry 1989;12(2):69-71.
  112. The effects of various concentrations and lengths of application of glutaraldehyde on monkey pulp tissue. Pediatric Dentistry 1988;10(2):115.
  113. Pulpotomy by electro-coagulation. NZ Dent J 1957;53:68.
  114. Pulpotomy of primary teeth by means of electrosurgery. Shoni Shikagaku Zasshi 1975;13:213-219.
  115. Electrosurgical pulpotomy in primates—a comparison with formocresol pulpotomy. Pediatric Dentistry 1983;5(1):14-18.
  116. Comparison of electrosurgery and formocresol as pulpotomy techniques in monkey primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry 1987;9(3):189-194.
  117. Electrosurgical pulpotomy: A pilot study in humans. Journal of Endodontics 1987;13(2):69-76.
  118. Dean JA. Electrosurgical pulpotomy: A retrospective human study. ASDC journal of dentistry for children 1993;60(2):107-114.
  119. Comparison of electrosurgery and formocresol as pulpotomy techniques in dog primary teeth. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry 1993;18(4):285-289.
  120. Comparison of electrosurgical and formocresol pulpotomy procedures in children. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12(3):177-182.
  121. Success of electrofulguration pulpotomies covered by zinc oxide and eugenol or calcium hydroxide: a clinical study. Pediatric Dentistry 1996;18(5):385-390.
  122. Histopathological changes in dental pulps irradiated by CO2 laser: a preliminary report on laser pulpotomy. Journal of Endodontics 1985;11(9):379-384.
  123. The effect of pulpotomy using CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers on dental pulp tissue. International endodontic journal 1997;30(3):175-180.
  124. Lasers in pediatric dentistry: A review. International Journal of Contemporary Dental and Medical Reviews 2015;2015. Article ID: 030115, 2015. doi: 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.29
  125. Pulpal tissue reaction to formocresol vs ferric sulfate in pulpotomized rat teeth. The Journal of clinical pediatric dentistry 1996;21(3):247-253.
  126. Evidence-based assessment: evaluation of the formocresol versus ferric sulfate primary molar pulpotomy. Pediatric Dentistry 2004;26(5):401-409.
  127. Comparative evaluation of Ferric Sulfate, Electrosurgical and Diode Laser on human primary molars pulpotomy: an ‘in-vivo’ study. Laser Ther 2014;23(1):41-47.
  128. Freeze-dried bone in pulpotomy procedures in monkey. The Journal of pedodontics 1988;13(2):108-122.
  129. The induction of reparative dentine in the amputated dental pulp of the dog by bone morphogenetic protein. Arch Oral Biol 1990;35(7):493-497.
  130. Induction of reparative dentine formation in monkeys by recombinant human osteogenic protein-1. Arch Oral Biol 1993;38(7):571-576.
  131. Evaluation of the novel anti-inflammatory agent tetrandrine as a pulpotomy medicament in a canine model. Pediatric Dentistry 1993;15(4):260-266.
  132. Pulpotomy and partial pulpectomy procedures in monkey teeth using cross-linked collagen-calcium phosphate gel. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology 1980;49(4):360-365.
  133. Enhanced healing of tooth-pulp wounds in the dog by enriched collagen solution as a capping agent. Archives of Oral Biology 1981;26(2):97-101.
  134. Enriched collagen solution as a pulp dressing in pulpotomized teeth in monkeys. Pediatric Dentistry 1984;6(4):243-247.
  135. Clinical, radiographic and histological observations of the radicular pulp following ‘feracrylum’ pulpotomy. J Clin Pediatr Dent 1997;21(2):151-156.
  136. A new translucent cement for dentistry. The glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 1972;132(4):133-135.
  137. Glass-ionomer cement. Quintessence Pub Co; 1988.
  138. Class I and class II light-hardened glassionomer/ resin restorations. Compendium 1993;14(7):908,910-902,914 passm; quiz 918.
  139. Glass ionomer cements in pediatric dentistry: review of the literature. Pediatric Dentistry 2002;24(5):423-429.
  140. In vitro studies on the potential for pulpal cytotoxicity of glass-ionomer cements. Journal of Dental Research 1988;67(6):915-918.
  141. Pulpal response to chemically cured and experimental light-cured glass ionomer cavity liners. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65(5):704-712.
  142. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. Journal of Endodontics 1995;21(7):349-353.
  143. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review: part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. Journal of Endodontics 2010;36(3):400-413.
  144. Is there sufficient evidence to support the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) for endodontic therapy in primary teeth? International endodontic journal 2013;46(3):198-204.
  145. Will Portland cement be a cheaper alternative to mineral trioxide aggregate in clinical use? a comprehensive review of literature. International Journal of Contemporary Dental and Medical Reviews 2015;2015. Article ID: 110215, 2015. doi: 10.15713/ins.ijcdmr.69
  146. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatric Dentistry 2000;23(1):15-18.
  147. A Comparison of four pulpotomy techniques in primary molars: a long-term follow-up. Journal of Endodontics 2008;34(8):950-955.
  148. Mineral trioxide aggregate as pulp dressing agent in pulpotomy treatment of primary molars: 42-month clinical study. American Journal of Dentistry 2007;20(5):283.
  149. Comparative evaluation of lyophilized freeze dried platelet derived preparation with calcium hydroxide as pulpotomy agents in primary molars. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2004;22(1):24-29.
  150. Histological evaluation of enamel matrix derivative as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry 2007;29(6):475-479.
  151. Comparison of enamel matrix derivative versus formocresol as pulpotomy agents in the primary dentition. Journal of Endodontics 2008;34(3):284-287.
  152. Preliminary evaluation of sodium hypochlorite for pulpotomies in primary molars. Pediatric Dentistry 2006;28(6):511-517.
  153. Sodium hypochlorite pulpotomies in primary teeth: a retrospective assessment. Pediatric Dentistry 2011;33(4):327-332.
  154. Sodium hypochlorite versus Formocresol in primary molars pulpotomies: a randomized clinical trial. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013;14(1):33-36.
  155. Sodium hypochlorite vs formocresol as pulpotomy medicaments in primary molars: 1-year follow-up. Pediatric Dentistry 2013;35(4):329-332.
  156. A randomized study of sodium hypochlorite versus formocresol pulpotomy in primary molar teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 2013;23(2):145-152.
  157. The effect of sodium hypochlorite application on the success of calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate pulpotomies in primary teeth. Pediatric Dentistry 2014;36(4):316-321.
  158. Pulpotomies with Portland cement in human primary molars. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17(1):66-69.
  159. Pulpotomy of human primary molars with MTA and Portland cement: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J 2009;207(3):E5; discussion 128-129.
  160. Understanding mineral trioxide aggregate/Portland cement: a review of literature and background factors. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry 2009;10(2):93-97.
  161. Nanohydroxyapatite used as a pulpotomy and direct pulp capping agent in primary pig teeth. ASDC journal of dentistry for children 2010;77(2):77-83.
  162. Treatment outcomes of pulpotomy in primary molars using two endodontic biomaterials. A 2-year randomised clinical trial. European journal of paediatric dentistry: official journal of European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry 2011;12(3):189-193.
  163. Calcium phosphate cement as an alternative for formocresol in primary teeth pulpotomies. Indian Journal of Dental Research 2013;24(4):522.
  164. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Allium sativum oil as a new medicament for vital pulp treatment of primary teeth. Journal of International Oral Health 2014;6(6).
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.