The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 1 ( January, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Klammt's Elastic Open Activator

Sheila Marques Inamassu-Lemes, Acácio Fuziy, André Luiz Ferreira Costa, Paulo Eduardo Guedes Carvalho, Ana Carla Raphaelli Nahás-Scocate

Citation Information : Inamassu-Lemes SM, Fuziy A, Costa AL, Carvalho PE, Nahás-Scocate AC. Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Klammt's Elastic Open Activator. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (1):63-69.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1804

Published Online: 00-01-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the dentoskeletal and soft tissue effects resulting from treatment with Klammt's elastic open activator (EOA) functional orthopedic appliance in patients with Class II malocclusion characterized by mandibular deficiency.

Materials and methods

Teleradiographs were evaluated in the lateral aspect of the initial (T1) and final (T2) orthopedic phases for 16 patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. The age range was from 9 to 11.2 years, with a mean age of 9.9 years. The cephalometric points were demarcated, and cephalometric measurements were obtained by the same investigator to avoid interobserver variability.

Results

The EOA promoted increased lower anterior facial height (LAFH), increased effective mandibular length, clockwise rotation of the mandible, retrusion and verticalization of the upper incisors, proclination and protrusion of the lower incisors, extrusion of the upper molars, mesial movement of the lower molars and anterior projection of the lower lip.

Conclusion

Skeletal changes characterized by an increase in mandibular length and dentoalveolar changes with an emphasis on the verticalization and retrusion of the upper incisors, proclination of the lower incisors and mesial positioning of the lower molars were key to improving the occlusal relationship and esthetic facial factors.

Clinical significance

The EOA is well indicated in patients with Class II malocclusion due to mandibular deficiency with increased overbite, proclined upper incisors and verticalized lower incisors.

How to cite this article

Inamassu-Lemes SM, Fuziy A, Costa ALF, Carvalho PEG, Nahás-Scocate ACR. Dentoskeletal and Soft Tissue Effects in the Treatment of Class II Malocclusion with Klammt's Elastic Open Activator. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(1):63-69.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared


PDF Share
  1. Various types of occlusion and amounts of overbite in normal and abnormal occlusion between two and twelve years. Int J Orth Oral Surg 1936 Jun;22(6):549-569.
  2. Prevalence of malocclusion in children aged 14 to 18 years. Am J Orthod 1951 Oct;37(10):751-768.
  3. Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in the United States: estimates from the N-HANES III survey. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1998;13(2):97-106.
  4. Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006 May;129(5):599.e1-e12.
  5. Differential diagnosis of Class II malocclusions. Part 1. Facial types associated with Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod 1980 Nov;78(5):477-494.
  6. Components of class II in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod 1981 Jul;51(3):177-202.
  7. Changes in dentofacial structures in untreated Class II division 1 and normal subjects: a longitudinal study. Angle Orthod 1997;67(1):55-66.
  8. Long-term dentoskeletal effects and facial changes induced by Bionator therapy. Angle Orthod 2010 Jan;80(1):10-17.
  9. Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009 May:135(5):570.e1-e6.
  10. Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the bionator, herbst, twin block, and MARA functional appliances. Angle Orthod 2010 Jan;80(1):18-29.
  11. Klammt's elastic open activator: Ricketts’ cephalometrics results. Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol 2001 Sep-Dec;43(3):78-86.
  12. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes during activator therapy. Eur J Orthod 2004 Jun;26(3):293-302.
  13. The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Semin Orthod 2005;11:119-129.
  14. Early mixed dentition treatment: postretention evaluation of stability and relapse. Angle Orthod 1995;65(5):311-320.
  15. Comprehensive mixed dentition treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998 Jan;113(1):75-84.
  16. Treatment results with Klammt's elastic open activator (EOA). Dtsch Stomatol 1971;21:534-536.
  17. Activateurs élastiques: modeleur élastique de Bimler et activateur de Klammt. Rev Orthod Fr 1992;63:373-380.
  18. Vertical and horizontal dentoskeletal changes induced by the Klammt open elastic activator. Ortodontia SPO 2011;44(5):460-466.
  19. Dental and skeletal changes in early Class II treatment with the open Klammt's activator. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1995;56:339-346.
  20. The effects of activator treatment on the craniofacial structures of Class II division 1 patients. 2003 Feb;25(1):87-93.
  21. Effects of activator and activator headgear treatment: comparison with untreated Class II subjects. Eur J Orthod 2006 Feb;28(1):27-34.
  22. Influence of orthopedic treatment on hard and soft facial structures of individuals presenting with Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a comparative study. J Appl Oral Sci 2004 Jun;12(2):164-170.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.