The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Reasons for not using Implants to retain Complete Denture: Patients’ Survey

Mohammad D Al Amri, Sulieman Al-Johany, Hanan AlOtaibi, Hamad Alzoman, Mohammed Alkindi, Fahad Alqahtani, Farhan Alwadei

Citation Information : Amri MD, Al-Johany S, AlOtaibi H, Alzoman H, Alkindi M, Alqahtani F, Alwadei F. Reasons for not using Implants to retain Complete Denture: Patients’ Survey. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (10):826-829.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1938

Published Online: 00-10-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to gain more information from complete denture (CD) wearers who did not receive dental implants, of the reasons preventing them from using implants to retain their CD in a selected sample of dental patients in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Materials and methods

A paper-and-pencil questionnaire containing 20 direct questions of the possible reasons preventing CD wearers from receiving implants to retain their dentures was distributed in three different places in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Results

A total of 270 subjects were included in this survey. The results showed that 180 (66.7%) patients indicated that the fear of pain associated with implant placement was the main reason preventing them from receiving an implant treatment, followed by fear of the surgical procedure (175, 64.8%), fear of postoperative complications (166, 61.5%), information from other people about the various problems associated with implant treatment (154, 57%), and finally cost of the implant (141, 52.2%).

Conclusion

Fear is the main reason preventing CD wearers from receiving implant treatment. Therefore, it is essential for dentists to be familiar with the reasons for implant refusal to overcome a common, yet an influential obstacle.

How to cite this article

Al-Johany S, AlOtaibi H, Al Amri MD, Alzoman H, Alkindi M, Alqahtani F, Alwadei F. Reasons for not using Implants to retain Complete Denture: Patients’ Survey. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(10):826-829.


PDF Share
  1. Sex differences in denture satisfaction. J Dent 2008 May;36(5):301-308.
  2. Determinants of dissatisfaction with dentures: a multiple regression analysis. J Prosthet Dent 1990 Nov;64(5):569-572.
  3. The influence of some anamnestic, demographic, and clinical variables on patient acceptance of new complete dentures. Acta Odontol Scand 1984 Apr;42(2):119-127.
  4. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: Satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003 Mar-Apr;16(2):117-122.
  5. The implant-supported overdenture as an alternative to the complete mandibular denture. J Am Dent Assoc 2003 Nov;134(11):1455-1458.
  6. The emotional effects of tooth loss in edentulous people. Br Dent J 1998 Jan;184(2):90-93.
  7. Edentulousness and oral rehabilitation: experiences from the patients’ perspective. Eur J Oral Sci 2002 Dec;110(6):417-424.
  8. A qualitative study on patient perspectives of how conventional and implant-supported dentures affect eating. J Dent 2009 Sep;37(9):718-723.
  9. Body and orofacial cathexis in edentulous complete-denturewearing clients. Clin Nurs Res 1993 Aug;2(3):296-308.
  10. The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2002 Sep;10(3):95-96.
  11. Mandibular two implant-supported overdentures as the first choice standard of care for edentulous patients – The York Consensus Statement. Br Dent J 2009 Aug;207(4):185-186.
  12. Refusal of implant supported mandibular overdentures by elderly patients. Gerodontology 2011 Mar;28(1):62-68.
  13. A randomized controlled trial of implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Dent Res 2006 Jun;85(6):547-551.
  14. A cost comparison of mandibular two-implant overdenture and conventional denture treatment. Int J Prosthodont 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):181-186.
  15. A survey of the use of mandibular implant overdentures in 10 countries. Int J Prosthodont 2004 Mar-Apr;17(2):211-217.
  16. Choosing or refusing oral implants: a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont 2005 Nov-Dec;18(6):483-488.
  17. Dental patients’ awareness and knowledge in using dental implants as an option in replacing missing teeth: a survey in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Dent J 2010 Oct:22(4):183-188.
  18. Representative marketing-oriented study on implants in the Austrian population. I. Level of information, sources of information and need for patient information. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003 Oct;14(5):621-633.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.