The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 3 ( March, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for detecting Foreign Bodies

Abbas Shokri, Sima Sadat Lari, Seyyed Mohammad Hosseinipanah, Shahin Rostami, Shabnam Seyedzadeh Sabounchi

Citation Information : Shokri A, Lari SS, Hosseinipanah SM, Rostami S, Sabounchi SS. Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for detecting Foreign Bodies. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (3):224-229.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1831

Published Online: 00-03-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

Foreign body detection and determining whether it is adjacent to critical organs has a significant role in its removal. Various imaging techniques have been used to locate foreign bodies. This study aimed to compare cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and digital radiography for detecting foreign bodies in an in vitro model.

Materials and methods

Foreign bodies composed of normal glass, barium glass, wood, and stone with two sizes were placed into three different locations of two sheep heads. Digital radiography [lateral cephalometric, submentovertex (SMV)] and CBCT were compared to investigate their sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies.

Results

Diagnostic sensitivity of digital radiography in lateral cephalometric view, SMV view, and CBCT for detecting all types of foreign bodies was 67.2, 32.3, and 76.6% respectively. None of these techniques were successful in detecting wood satisfactory. Stone was detected relatively higher than other foreign bodies (82.6%). Diagnostic sensitivity of CBCT in detecting foreign bodies was 100%, except for wood. Accuracy of imaging techniques in detecting foreign bodies according to locations in descending order was lip, mandibular angle, and maxillary sinus.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that appropriate amount of radiopacity is enough for CBCT to exactly detect foreign body, regardless of its location or size.

Clinical significance

In maxillofacial traumatic patients, CBCT seems to be a better and cost-effective technique for detecting hidden foreign bodies than other routine techniques.

How to cite this article

Lari SS, Shokri A, Hosseinipanah SM, Rostami S, Sabounchi SS. Comparative Sensitivity Assessment of Cone Beam Computed Tomography and Digital Radiography for Detecting Foreign Bodies. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(3):224-229.


PDF Share
  1. X-ray-based volumetric imaging of foreign bodies: a comparison of computed tomography and digital volume tomography. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007 Sep;65(9):1880-1885.
  2. Foreign bodies. Radiographics 2003 May-Jun;23(3):731-757.
  3. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010 Feb;39(2):72-78.
  4. Computed intraoperative navigation guidance—a preliminary report on a new technique. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997 Aug;35(4):271-274.
  5. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993 Apr;22(2):119-124.
  6. Evaluation of soft-tissue foreign bodies: comparing conventional plain film radiography, computed radiography printed on film, and computed radiography displayed on a computer workstation. Am J Roentgenol 1996 Jul;167(1):141-144.
  7. Comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of acute wooden foreign bodies in the canine manus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2008 Sep-Oct;49(5):411-418.
  8. Do we really need plain and soft-tissue radiographies to detect radiolucent foreign bodies in the ED? Am J Emerg Med 2006 Nov;24(7):763-768.
  9. [Detection of orbital foreign bodies by CT: are plain radiographs of foreign bodies still useful?] Rofo 1997 Jun;166(6):487-492. German.
  10. Ultrasonography detection of radiolucent foreign bodies in soft tissue compared to computed tomography scan. Ann Saudi Med 1995 Mar;15(2):110-112.
  11. Use of plain radiography and computed tomography to identify fish bone foreign bodies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000 Oct;123(4):435-438.
  12. [Evaluation of radiological methods for detection of wood foreign body in animal model. Acta Cir Bras 2005;20(Supp 1):34-41.
  13. The role of ultrasonography in detection and localization of radiolucent foreign body in soft tissues of extremities. J Nepal Med Assoc 2009 Jan-Mar;48(173):5-9.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.