The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 4 ( April, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Immediate and Delayed Effects of Diode Laser on Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: An in vitro Study

N Rajvikram, P Rajakumar, R Saravanan, Praveena Anand, PB Anand, Ramachandran Prabhakar, Varun Reddy Atali

Citation Information : Rajvikram N, Rajakumar P, Saravanan R, Anand P, Anand P, Prabhakar R, Atali VR. Immediate and Delayed Effects of Diode Laser on Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (4):275-281.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1841

Published Online: 01-08-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; The Author(s).


Abstract

Aim

The aim of the study is to evaluate the immediate and delayed effects of diode laser on debonding of ceramic brackets.

Materials and methods

A total of 60 human extracted premolar teeth were randomly assigned to three different treatment groups. All teeth were bonded with adhesive precoated (APC) ceramic brackets (3M Unitek). A total of 20 teeth were debonded without lasing (group 1), 20 immediately after lasing (group 2), and 20 1 hour after lasing (group 3). For the lasing groups (groups 2 and 3), access cavity was prepared on the occlusal surface to a 2 mm diameter. A transbond plus self-etching primer (3M Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) and APC PLUS clarity advanced brackets (3M, Unitek, Monrovia, CA, USA) were used. The shear bond strength (SBS) and adhesive remnant index (ARI) were measured. The internal pulpal wall temperature was noted for the laser groups.

Results

The mean SBS was 15.4, 11.57, and 11.79 MPa for groups 1 to 3 respectively. Post hoc test showed significant difference (p < 0.001) between the control group and the lased groups. For groups 2 and 3, the rise in temperature was at an average of 1.4 and 1.3°C respectively.

Conclusion

The SBS of APC brackets decreased by 33.3% on application of diode laser without increasing the internal pulp chamber wall temperature significantly. Shear bond strength remains more or less the same whether debonding is done immediately after lasing or 1 hour after lasing. Diode lasers increased the ARI scores and thus decreased the risk of enamel fracture.

How to cite this article

Anand P, Anand PB, Prabhakar R, Rajvikram N, Rajakumar P, Atali VR, Saravanan R. Immediate and Delayed Effects of Diode Laser on Debonding of Ceramic Brackets: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(4):275-281.


PDF Share
  1. Ceramic brackets. J Clin Orthod 1998 Feb;22(2):82-88.
  2. Aesthetic orthodontic brackets. J Orthod 2005 Jun;32(2):146-163.
  3. Comparison of bonding time and shear bond strength between a conventional and a new integrated bonding system. Angle Orthod 2005 Mar;75(2):237-242.
  4. Morphology of polycrystalline alumina brackets and its relationship to fracture toughness and strength. Angle Orthod 1988 Jul;58(3):197-203.
  5. Fracture strength of ceramic brackets subjected to mesialdistal arch wire tipping forces. Angle Orthod 1992 Spring;62(1):67-76.
  6. Patient discomfort levels at the time of debonding: a pilot study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992 Apr;101(4):313-317.
  7. Loss of surface enamel after bracket debonding: an in vivo and ex-vivo evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010 Oct;138(4):387e1-387e9.
  8. Comparisons of the effectiveness of pliers with narrow and wide blades in debonding ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993 Mar;103(3):253-257.
  9. Comparisons of different debonding techniques for ceramic brackets: an in vitro study Part 1. Background and methods. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990 Aug;98(2):145-153.
  10. Thermal image analysis of electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an in vitro study. Eur J Orthod 1999 Apr;21(2):111-118.
  11. Heat generated by grinding during removal of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991 Jun;99(6):505-512.
  12. Laser-aided debonding of orthodontic ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992 Feb;101(2):152-158.
  13. Nd: YAG laser for debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 Nov;128(5):638-647.
  14. Debonding of ceramic brackets by a new scanning laser method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010 Aug;138(2):195-200.
  15. Diode laser de-bonding of pre-coated ceramic brackets. J Am Sci 2013;9(5s):177-181.
  16. Direct bonding of orthodontic attachments to teeth: the relation of adhesive bond strength to mesh size. Br J Orthod 1976 Apr;3(2):91-95.
  17. Principles of cosmetic dentistry in orthodontics: part 1. Shape and proportionality of anterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 Dec;126(6):749-753.
  18. Long term clinical evaluation of bracket failure with a self-etching primer: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthod 2007 Dec;34(4):243-251.
  19. Comparison of different bonding materials for laser debonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995 Sep;108(3):267-273.
  20. Ceramic bracket debonding with the carbon dioxide laser. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996 Oct;110(4):388-393.
  21. Diode laser debonding of ceramic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010 Oct;138(4):458-462.
  22. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965 Apr;19:515-530.
  23. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988 Sep;94(3):201-206.
  24. In vivo and in vitro comparison of bond strengths of orthodontic brackets bonded to enamel and debonded at various times. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007 Mar;131(3):384-390.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.