The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 5 ( May, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Study of the Mechanical Properties of the Novel Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement

Zeeshan H Ahmad, Sukumaran Anil, Shilpa H Bhandi, Elna P Chalisserry, Mohammed Almuhaiza, Abdulaziz M AlZailai

Citation Information : Ahmad ZH, Anil S, Bhandi SH, Chalisserry EP, Almuhaiza M, AlZailai AM. Study of the Mechanical Properties of the Novel Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (5):394-398.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1861

Published Online: 01-05-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Objectives

The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the compressive strength (CS) and diametral tensile strength (DTS) of the zirconia-reinforced restorative material (Zirconomer®) with conventional glass ionomers (Fuji 1X) and amalgam.

Materials and methods

Specimens (n = 120) were fabricated from silver amalgam, reinforced glass ionomer cement (GIC) (glass ionomer, Fuji 1X GC Corp.), and zirconia-reinforced glass ionomer (Zirconomer, Shofu Inc.) for testing the CS and DTS. The results were analyzed using analysis of variance, followed by a Tukey post hoc test.

Results

Both CS and DTS were found to be significantly higher for the zirconia-reinforced GIC and silver amalgam compared with GIC (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

A newer class of restorative material like Zirconomer helps to overcome the potential hazard of mercury, but retains the strength and durability of amalgam as well as the sustained high-fluoride release of GICs. Furthermore, long-term studies are required to confirm its use as an alternative to the currently available posterior restorative material.

How to cite this article

Chalissery VP, Marwah N, Almuhaiza M, AlZailai AM, Chalisserry EP, Bhandi SH, Anil S. Study of the Mechanical Properties of the Novel Zirconia-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(5):394-398.


PDF Share
  1. Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. J Adhes Dent 2001 Spring;3(1):45-64.
  2. The glass-ionomer cement, a new translucent dental filling material. J Appl Chem Biotechnol 1971 Nov;21(11):313-313.
  3. Fracture resistance of restored maxillary premolars. Contemp Mater 2013;2(3):219-225.
  4. Dental devices: Classification of dental amalgam, reclassification of dental mercury, designation of special controls for dental amalgam, mercury, and amalgam alloy. Final rule. Fed Regist 2009 Aug;74(148):38685-38714.
  5. Characterization of glass-ionomer cements. 7. The physical properties of current materials. J Dent 1984 Sep;12(3):231-240.
  6. Compressive strength of glass ionomer cements using different specimen dimensions. Braz Oral Res 2007 Jul-Sep;21(3):204-208.
  7. Glass ionomers in contemporary restorative dentistry . a clinical update. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003 Jun;31(6):483-492.
  8. ; Garbelotto, LGD.; Fredel, MC.; Bondioli, F. Application of zirconia in dentistry: Biological, mechanical and optical considerations. In:Sikalidis, C., editors. Advances in ceramics – electric and magnetic ceramics, bioceramics, ceramics and environment. Rijeka: InTech; 2011. p. 397-404.
  9. Zirconia posts: a new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth. J Esthet Dent 1995;7(2):73-80.
  10. A zirconia implant-crown system: a case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004 Apr;24(2):147-153.
  11. CAD/CAM-machining effects on Y-TZP zirconia. Dent Mater 2004 Sep;20(7):655-662.
  12. Zirconia ceramic: a versatile restorative material. Dentistry 2014 Apr;4(219):2161-1122. 1000219.
  13. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999 Sep;82(3):272-276.
  14. Critical appraisal: dental amalgam update-part I: Clinical efficacy. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013 Oct;25(5):360-364.
  15. An amalgam-free world – are we and our patients ready? Dent Update 2016 Jan-Feb;43(1):5-6.
  16. Polymerization shrinkage stresses in a premolar restored with different composite resins and different incremental techniques. J Adhes Dent 2013 Aug;15(4):341-350.
  17. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in class II restorations. J Dent 2015;43(12):1547-1558.
  18. Effects of nanocrystalline calcium deficient hydroxyapatite incorporation in glass ionomer cements. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2012 Mar;7:69-76.
  19. Effects of incorporation of HA/ZrO(2) into glass ionomer cement (GIC). Biomaterials 2005 Mar;26(7):713-720.
  20. A review of glass ionomer restorations in the primary dentition. J Can Dent Assoc 1999 Oct;65(9):491-495.
  21. Modification of conventional glass-ionomer cements with N-vinylpyrrolidone containing polyacids, nanohydroxy and fluoroapatite to improve mechanical properties. Dent Mater 2008 Oct;24(10):1381-1390.
  22. Bacterial colonization of zirconia ceramic surfaces: an in vitro and in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002 Nov-Dec;17(6):793-798.
  23. Effect of conditioning methods on the microtensile bond strength of phosphate monomer-based cement on zirconia ceramic in dry and aged conditions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008 Apr;85(1):1-9.
  24. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999 Jan;20(1):1-25.
  25. An in vitro evaluation of microleakage of posterior teeth restored with amalgam, composite and zirconomer – a stereomicroscopic study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015 Jul;9(7):Zc65-67.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.