The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 6 ( June, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Functional Evaluation of the Behavior of Masticatory Muscles in Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture: A Prospective Study

Srimathi Panchanathan, Maya Saranathan, Arun Kumar Kamalakaran, Karthikeyan Duraisamy

Citation Information : Panchanathan S, Saranathan M, Kamalakaran AK, Duraisamy K. Functional Evaluation of the Behavior of Masticatory Muscles in Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture: A Prospective Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (6):463-469.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1873

Published Online: 01-06-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aims

The purpose of this study is to functionally evaluate the behavior of the masticatory muscles (masseter and temporalis) following zygomaticomaxillary complex (ZMC) fractures by assessing bite force, electromyography (EMG), and mandibular movements.

Materials and methods

Group I consisted of 20 patients with unilateral ZMC fractures who were treated surgically with one-, two-, or three-point fixations at the frontozygomatic, infraorbital, or zygomaticomaxillary buttress region as per clinical and radiological assessments. Group II control group included 20 normal patients. The muscle activity was functionally evaluated before and after the surgery for a period of 6 months. The evaluation consisted of bite force measurement, EMG analysis of masseter and temporalis muscles, and measurements of mandibular movements.

Results

There was an increase in bite force and EMG activity throughout the evaluated postoperative period, but at the end of 6 months, the values were still below the control levels for majority of the patients. Maximum mouth opening increased considerably after the surgery.

Conclusion

According to bite force and EMG, the masticatory musculature returned to near normal levels by the 3rd month after the surgery.

Clinical significance

Management of fractures of the zygoma by open reduction and fixation raises the question of the location of fixation points owing to the action of masseter and temporalis on the ZMC. This study supports the current clinical concept of minimized fixation in treating ZMC fractures.

How to cite this article

Panchanathan S, Saranathan M, Kamalakaran AK, Duraisamy K. Functional Evaluation of the Behavior of Masticatory Muscles in Zygomaticomaxillary Complex Fracture: A Prospective Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(6):463-469.


PDF Share
  1. Structural pillars of the facial skeleton: an approach to the management of Le Fort fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980 Jul;66(1):54-62.
  2. Facial fractures: a review of 922 cases with special reference to incidence and aetiology. Clin Otolaryngol 1982;7(6):405-409.
  3. Applied surgical anatomy. In: Williams JL, editor. Rowe and Williams maxillofacial injuries. New York (NY): Churchill Livingstone; 1994. p. 19-23.
  4. The effects of zygomatic complex fracture on masseteric muscle force. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992 Aug;50(8):791-799.
  5. Strain gauge analysis of the frontozygomatic region of the zygomatic complex. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996 Sep;54(9):1092-1095.
  6. Zygomatic fractures: a simplified classification for practical use. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1978;12(1):55-58.
  7. Analysis of treatment for isolated zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996 Apr;54(4):386-400.
  8. The use of a single frontozygomatic osteosynthesis plate and a sinus balloon in the repair of fractures of the lateral middle third of the face. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1981 Aug;9(3):188-193.
  9. Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992 Aug;50(8):778-790.
  10. Fractures of the zygoma. A geometric, biomechanical, and surgical analysis. Arch Otolaryngol 1979 Jun;105(6):320-327.
  11. Single eyelid incision for exposure of the zygomatic bone and orbital reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987 Jan;79(1):120-126.
  12. Internal fixation of malar fractures: an experimental biophysical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989 Jul;84(1):21-25.
  13. Bite force, electromyography, and mandible mobility during the 6-month period after surgical treatment for isolated fractures of the zygomatico-orbital complex. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011 Apr;111(4):e1-e7.
  14. Electromyographical analysis of the masseter muscle in dentulous and partially toothless patients with temporomandibular joint disorders. Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2006 Sep;46(5):263-268.
  15. A biomechanical analysis of craniofacial form and bite force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991 Apr;99(4):298-309.
  16. Peri- and intraorbital trauma and orbital reconstruction. In: Ward Booth P, Schendel SA, Hausamen JE, editors. Maxillofacial surgery. London: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 177-193.
  17. Changing patterns in the epidemiology and treatment of zygoma fractures: 10-year review. J Trauma 1994 Aug;37(2):243-248.
  18. Treatment of zygomatic bone fractures. In: Hjorting-Hansen E, editor. Oral and maxillofacial surgery: proceedings from the 8th international conference of oral and maxillofacial surgery. Chicago (IL): Quintessence;. 1985. p. 226-231.
  19. Fractures of the zygomatic complex. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;44:283-288.
  20. Complex maxillary fractures: role of buttress reconstruction and immediate bone grafts. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986 Jul;78(1):9-22.
  21. Minimization of zygomatic complex fracture treatment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001 Oct;30(5):380-383.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.