The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 7 ( July, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effect of Different Obturation Techniques on the Prognosis of Endodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis

Jyoti Sachdeva, Anurag Sarin, Ajai Gupta, Shobhit Sachdeva

Citation Information : Sachdeva J, Sarin A, Gupta A, Sachdeva S. Effect of Different Obturation Techniques on the Prognosis of Endodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (7):582-586.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1893

Published Online: 00-07-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Success of root canal therapy (RCT) is largely dependent upon the quality of biomechanical preparation and obturation of the pulp canal. Improperly cleaned or shaped root canal, regardless of the type of obturation method and obturating material, cannot lead to the success of endodontic therapy. Hence, we conducted a clinical comparative analysis of two obturating techniques.

Materials and methods

A total of 140 patients receiving RCT at the department of Endodontic were included in the present study. The average follow-up time for the patients was 29 months (18–38 months). Patients were grouped into two depending on the type of obturating technique used. Evaluation of the clinical and radiographic follow-up records of the patients was done and analysis was made. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for assessing the level of significance.

Results

The average age of the patients undergoing obturation with carrier-based obturation (CO) technique and lateral compaction (LC) technique was 43 and 48 years respectively. While comparing failure and success of the teeth at the time of follow-up, nonsignificant results were obtained. Significant difference was seen, while comparing the presence of voids and type of teeth in which endodontic therapy was performed using different obturating techniques.

Conclusion

Endodontic therapy done with LC obturating technique or with CO technique shows prognostic difference on the outcome or quality of treatment therapy.

Clinical significance

Quality of obturation is more important rather than type while performing endodontic therapy for better prognosis.

How to cite this article

Sarin A, Gupta P, Sachdeva J, Gupta A, Sachdeva S, Nagpal R. Effect of Different Obturation Techniques on the Prognosis of Endodontic Therapy: A Retrospective Comparative Analysis. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(7):582-586.


PDF Share
  1. Cleaning and shaping the root canal. Dent Clin North Am 1974 Apr;18(2):269-296.
  2. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am 1967 Nov;11:723-744.
  3. Guidelines for access cavity preparation in endodontics. Dental CE Digest 2006;3(2):13-20.
  4. Fluorometric assay of the apical seal of root canal fillings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1970 May;29(5):753-762.
  5. Effect of three obturation techniques on the filling of lateral canals and the main canal. J Endod 1993 Aug;19(8):404-408.
  6. Code 99140. Park Ridge (IL): American Society of Anesthesiologists; 2002. p. 12.
  7. Clinical evaluation of lowtemperature thermoplasticized injectable gutta-percha: a preliminary report. J Endod 1989 Dec;15(12):602-607.
  8. Endodontic obturation: a review. Gen Dent 2003 May-Jun;51(3):232-233.
  9. Gutta-percha root canal fillings, an in vitro analysis. Part I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1973 Feb;35(2):226-231.
  10. The effect of insertion rates on fill length and adaptation of a thermoplasticized guttapercha technique. J Endod 2003 Aug;29(8):505-508.
  11. A laboratory study of root fillings in teeth obturated by lateral condensation of gutta-percha or Thermafil obturators. Int Endod J 1994 Jan;27(1):32-38.
  12. Two-year in vitro solubility evaluation of four gutta-percha sealer obturation techniques. J Endod 1986 Apr;12(4):139-145.
  13. Scanning electron microscopic examination of root canal filling materials. J Endod 1976 Apr;2(4):98-110.
  14. Outcome of root canal treatment using Thermafil and cold lateral condensation filling techniques. Int Endod J 2005 Mar;38(3):179-185.
  15. Coronal leakage following three obturation techniques. Int Endod J 2001 Jun;34(4):293-299.
  16. A radiographic recall evaluation of 894 endodontic cases treated in a dental school setting. J Endod 2002 May;28(5):391-395.
  17. Survival of first-time nonsurgical root canal treatment performed in a dental teaching hospital. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2002 May;93(5):596-604.
  18. The outcome of root canal treatment. A retrospective study within the armed forces (Royal Air Force). British Dent J 2001 Feb 10;190(3):140-144.
  19. Comparative analysis of carrier-based obturation and lateral compaction: a retrospective clinical outcomes study. Int J Dent 2012; 2012:954675:1-8.
  20. The influence of the method of canal preparation on the quality of apical and coronal obturation. J Endod 1979 Oct;5(10):298-304.
  21. Filling of simulated lateral canals with gutta-percha or thermoplastic polymer by warm vertical compaction. Braz Oral Res 2015;29(1):1-6.
  22. Effect of six obturation techniques on filling of lateral canals. J Res Pract Dent 2014;2014:1-7.
  23. Effectiveness of four different gutta percha techniques in filling experimental internal resorptive lesions – an in vitro study. Endodontology 2016 Jun;26(1):128-136.
  24. Comparative evaluation of three different obturating techniques lateral compaction, thermafil and calamus for filling area and voids using cone beam computed tomography: an invitro study. J Clin Diagn Res 2015 Aug;9(8):ZC15-ZC17.
  25. Root canal treatment using thermoplasticized carrier condensation technique. Med J Armed Forces India 2009 Oct;65(4):336-341.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.