The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 17 , ISSUE 9 ( September, 2016 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Golden Proportion Analysis of Dental–Skeletal Patterns of Class II and III Patients Pre and Post Orthodontic-orthognathic Treatment

Mariliani Chicarelli, Fernanda P Bragatto, Amanda VB Kasuya, Wilton M Takeshita, Liogi Iwaki-Filho, Lilian CV Iwaki

Citation Information : Chicarelli M, Bragatto FP, Kasuya AV, Takeshita WM, Iwaki-Filho L, Iwaki LC. Golden Proportion Analysis of Dental–Skeletal Patterns of Class II and III Patients Pre and Post Orthodontic-orthognathic Treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016; 17 (9):728-733.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1920

Published Online: 01-09-2016

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2016; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

The golden proportion has been used in dentistry in an attempt to improve facial function and, possibly, esthetics by simplifying the diagnosis of facial and dental disharmony. The aim of this study is to analyze pre- and postoperative cephalometric tracings of lateral cephalograms of patients with class II and III deformities submitted to orthognathic surgery, and verify if the 13 dental–skeletal patterns (ratios), as defined by Ricketts, moved closer to or further away from the golden proportion.

Materials and methods

A total of 110 lateral cephalometric radiographs, 55 obtained preoperatively and 55 postoperatively, were analyzed using Dolphin Imaging software.

Results

Radiographs analysis demonstrated that ratios 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 13 remained statistically different from the golden proportion postoperatively. Ratio 12 was the only one to move closer to the golden number, while the opposite happened with ratio 6, which moved further away after the surgery. Ratios 2 and 11 kept statistically similar to the golden proportion both pre and postoperatively.

Conclusion

It may be concluded that orthognathic surgery had little effect on the proportions studied, and that the golden proportion was not present in the majority of the ratios analyzed neither before nor after surgery.

Clinical significance

Determine whether the facial patterns approach the golden ratio after surgical correction. Also determine whether the golden ratio may be a standard to guide the surgical treatment of patients with skeletal patterns of type II and III.

How to cite this article

Bragatto FP, Chicarelli M, Kasuya AVB, Takeshita WM, Iwaki-Filho L, Iwaki LCV. Golden Proportion Analysis of Dental–Skeletal Patterns of Class II and III Patients Pre and Post Orthodontic-orthognathic Treatment. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(9):728-733.


PDF Share
  1. Aesthetics and orthodontics. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1969 Mar;19(7):247-260.
  2. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod 1982 May;81(5):351-370.
  3. Easy facial analysis using the facial golden mask. J Craniofac Surg 2007 May;18(3):643-649.
  4. Divine proportions in the growing face. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008 Oct;134(4):472-479.
  5. Dentofacial deformities treated according to a dentoskeletal analysis based on the divine proportion: are the resulting faces de facto “divinely” proportioned? J Craniofac Surg 2011 Jan;22(1):147-150.
  6. The principles of visual perception and their clinical application to denture esthetics. J Prosthet Dent 1973 Apr;29(4):358-382.
  7. Dental esthetics and the golden proportion. J Prosthet Dent 1978 Sep;40(3):244-252.
  8. The golden number: applications to cranio-facial evaluation. Funct Orthod 1995 Jan-Feb;12(1):18-21, 24-25.
  9. Proportions of maxillary anterior teeth relative to each other and to golden standard in tabriz dental faculty students. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2010 Summer;4(3):83-86.
  10. A study on the practical applicability of the rule of golden rectangle in dental aesthetics. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2011 Jun;19(2):85-89.
  11. Evaluation of the Divine Proportion in the facial profile of young females. Indian J Dent Res 2008 Oct-Dec;19(4):292-296.
  12. Divine proportions in attractive and nonattractive faces. World J Orthod 2010 Spring;11(1):27-36.
  13. The golden ratio in facial symmetry. Rhinology 2013 Mar;51(1):18-21.
  14. The role of the divine proportion in the esthetic improvement of patients undergoing combined orthodontic/orthognathic surgical treatment. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 2001;16(2):108-120.
  15. Relationship between the mesiodistal width of the maxillary central incisor and interpupillary distance. J Prosthet Dent 1984 Nov;52(5):641-643.
  16. Evaluation of “golden proportion” in individuals with an esthetic smile. J Esthet Restor Dent 2004;16(3):185-192.
  17. Putative golden proportions as predictors of facial esthetics in adolescents. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008 Oct;134(4):480-483.
  18. Effect of changes in divine proportion on esthetic perception of smile in frontal view. J Craniofac Surg 2013 Nov;24(6):1946-1949.
  19. Identification of facial shape by applying golden ratio to the facial measurements: an interracial study in Malaysian population. N Am J Med Sci 2012 Dec;4(12):624-629.
  20. Photometric study of divine proportion and its correlation with facial attractiveness. Dental Press J Orthod 2012 Mar-Apr;17(2):124-131.
  21. Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg 1982 Oct;9(4):401-422.
  22. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993 Apr;103(4):299-312.
  23. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning – Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993 May;103(5):395-411.
  24. Facial beauty-establishing a universal standard. Int J Orthod Milwaukee 2004 Spring;15(1):9-22.
  25. Assessment of divine proportion in the cranial structure of individuals with Angle Class II malocclusion on lateral cephalograms. Dental Press J Orthod 2012 May-Jun;17(3):88-97.
  26. Evaluation of maxillary anterior teeth and their relation to the golden proportion in Malaysian population. BMC Oral Health 2013 Jan 24;13:9.
  27. Facial aesthetics and the assignment of personality traits before and after orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012 Apr;41(4):469-476.
  28. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 Jun;127(6):676-682.
  29. Assessment of facial golden proportions among north Maharashtrian population. J Int Oral Health 2013 Jun;5(3):48-54.
  30. Assessment of the “golden proportion” in agreeable smiles. Quintessence Int 2006 Sep;37(8):597-604.
  31. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2005 Dec;94(6):530-538.
  32. A study of dentists’ preferred maxillary anterior tooth width proportions: comparing the recurring esthetic dental proportion to other mathematical and naturally occurring proportions. J Esthet Restor Dent 2007;19(6):324-337.
  33. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1994;9(1):43-54.
  34. Public preferences for anterior tooth variations: a web-based study. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002;14(2):97-106.
  35. Esthetic paradigms in the interdisciplinary management of maxillary anterior dentition-a review. J Esthet Restor Dent 2013 Oct;25(5):295-304.
  36. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 2006 Mar;76(2):204-210.
PDF Share
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.