The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 10 ( October, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Morphology of the Dentin–resin Interface yielded by Two-step Etch-and-rinse Adhesives with Different Solvents

Joao Cardoso Ferreira, Patrícia T Pires, Álvaro F de Azevedo, Sofia Arantes-Oliveira, Mário J Silva, Paulo R de Melo

Citation Information : Ferreira JC, Pires PT, de Azevedo ÁF, Arantes-Oliveira S, Silva MJ, de Melo PR. Morphology of the Dentin–resin Interface yielded by Two-step Etch-and-rinse Adhesives with Different Solvents. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (10):947-958.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2155

Published Online: 00-10-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Aim

The study aimed to analyze the morphology of the dentin–resin interface yielded by two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive systems with different solvents and compositions.

Materials and methods

A total of 32 dentine disks were prepared and randomly assigned to four groups of one-bottle etchand-rinse adhesive systems containing different solvents: group I, Adper Scotchbond-1XT™ (ethanol/water); group II, XP-Bond™ (tertiary butanol); group III, Prime and Bond NT® (acetone); and group IV, One Coat bond® (5% water). Adhesive systems were applied onto dentin disks, which were then thermal cycled, divided into two hemi-disks (n = 16), and prepared for field-emission scanning electron microscopy to examine the dentin–resin interdiffusion zone. Microphotographs were scanned and data were processed. Data were compared with analysis of variance multivariant test after Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Shapiro–Wilk tests using Statistic Package for the Social Sciences.

Results

The adhesive layer thickness average found was group I: 45.9 ± 13.41 μm, group II: 20.6 ± 16.32 μm, group III: 17.7 ± 11.75 μm, and group IV: 50.7 ± 27.81 μm. Significant differences were found between groups I and IV and groups II and III (p<0.000).

Groups I (3.23 ± 0.53 μm) and II (3.13 ± 0.73 μm) yielded significantly thicker hybrid layers than groups III (2.53 ± 0.50 μm) and IV (1.84 ± 0.27 μm) (p<0.003). Group III presented a less homogeneous hybrid layer, with some gaps. Tag length average was greater in groups II (111.0 ± 36.92 μm) and IV (128.9 ± 78.38 μm) than in groups I (61.5 ± 18.10 μm) and III (68.6 ± 15.84 μm) (p<0.008).

Conclusion

Adhesives systems with different solvents led to significant differences in the dentin–resin interface morphology. Solvents role in adhesives bond strength should be considered together with the other adhesive system components.

Clinical significance

The adhesive containing tertiary butanol, in addition, seems to originate a good-quality hybrid layer and long, entangled tags and also appears to have greater ability to originate microtags, which may indicate higher bond strength.

How to cite this article

Ferreira JC, Pires PT, de Azevedo ÁF, Arantes-Oliveira S, Silva MJ, de Melo PR. Morphology of the Dentin–resin Interface yielded by Two-step Etch-and-rinse Adhesives with Different Solvents. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(10):947-958.


PDF Share
  1. Comparative SEM evaluation of penetration of adhesive systems in human dentin with a non-rinse conditioner and a self-etching primer. Braz Dent J 2004;15(1)19-25.
  2. Morphologic aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with five different dentin adhesive systems tested in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1994 Apr;71(4):404-408.
  3. Dentinal tubule anastomosis: a potential factor in adhesive bonding? J Prosthet Dent 1994 Aug;72(2):183-188.
  4. A confocal microscopic evaluation of resin-dentin interface using adhesive systems with three different solvents bonded to dry and moist dentinan in vitro study. Quintessence Int 2005 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):511-521.
  5. Microscopy investigations. Techniques, results, limitations. Am J Dent 2000;13:3D-18D.
  6. Estudo de Microscopia Electrónica Para Avaliação da Formação da Camada Híbrida e Prolongamentos de Resina de Quatro Adesivos Total-Etch de 5a Geração contendo diferentes Solventes. Porto: Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto; 2008.
  7. Clinical correlations of dentin structure and function. J Prosthet Dent 1991 Dec;66(6):777-781.
  8. Buonocore memorial lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent 2003 May-Jun;28(3):215-235.
  9. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992 Aug;5(4):213-215.
  10. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996 Jul;12(4):236-244.
  11. Dental adhesion: present state of the art and future perspectives. Quintessence Int 2002 Mar;33(3):213-224.
  12. Morphological characterization of single bottle adhesives and vital dentin interface. Am J Dent 2002 Feb;15(1):31-34.
  13. Shear bond strength of acetone-based one-bottle adhesive systems. Braz Dent J 2006;17(1)39-43.
  14. Dentin bond strengths as a function of solvent and glutaraldehyde content. Am J Dent 2001 Aug;14(4):221-226.
  15. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials 2007 Sep;28(26):3757-3785.
  16. Effect of primer solvent, primer agitation, and dentin dryness on shear bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1998 Oct;11(5):225-228.
  17. Field emission SEM comparison of four postfixation drying techniques for human dentin. J Biomed Mater Res 1995 Sep;29(9):1111-1120.
  18. Interaction patterns between dentin and adhesive on prepared class V cavities in vitro and in vivo. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53(1)86-92.
  19. Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 2001;26(1)97-104
  20. Effects of the acetone content of single solution dentin bonding agents on the adhesive layer thickness and the microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater 2004 Feb;20(2):107-115.
  21. Effect of multiple application of a dentin adhesive on contraction gap width of a resin-based composite. Am J Dent 2002 Jun;15(3):159-163.
  22. Effects of multiple adhesive coatings on dentin bonding. Oper Dent 2004 Jul-Aug;29(4):416-423.
  23. Effect of primer solvent and curing mode on dentin shear bond strength and interface morphology. Quintessence Int 2003 Jul-Aug;34(7):548-555.
  24. Ultrastructural transmission electron microscopy (TEM) study of hybrid layers formed beneath a one-bottle adhesive system using the total-etch technique and a self-etching system. Quintessence Int 2003 Jun;34(6):447-452.
  25. Effect of hybrid layer on fracture toughness of adhesively bonded dentin-resin composite joint. Dent Mater 1998 Mar;14(2):91-98.
  26. Heterogeneous distribution of single-bottle adhesive monomers in the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone. Dent Mater 2001 Jul;17(4):277-283.
  27. Correlation of the hybrid layer thickness and resin tags length with the bond strength of a self-etching adhesive system. Acta Odontol Latinoam 2009;22(3)177-181.
  28. Effect of prolonged application times on resin-dentin bond strengths. J Adhes Dent 2005 Summer;7(2):143-149.
  29. The effect of depth of dentin demineralization on bond strengths and morphology of the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 2000 May-Jun;25(3):186-194.
  30. Effect of phosphoric acid concentration on wet-bonding to etched dentin. Dent Mater 1996 Jul;12(4):250-255.
  31. The in vitro morphological effects of some current pre-treatments on dentin surface: a SEM evaluation. Oper Dent 2005 Mar-Apr;30(2):201-212.
  32. Permeability of marginal hybrid layers in composite restorations. Clin Oral Investig 2005 Mar;9(1):1-7.
  33. Nanoleakage within the hybrid layer: a correlative FEISEM/TEM investigation. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005 Apr;73(1):7-14.
  34. SEM and TEM analysis of water degradation of human dentinal collagen. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2003 Jul 15;66(1):287-298.
  35. Long-term TEM analysis of the nanoleakage patterns in resin-dentin interfaces produced by different bonding strategies. Dent Mater 2007 Sep;23(9):1164-1172.
  36. Morphological study of resin-dentin bonding with TEM and in-lens FESEM. Am J Dent 2003 Aug;16(4):267-274.
  37. How wet should dentin be? Comparison of methods to remove excess water during moist bonding. J Adhes Dent 2001 Fall;3(3):257-264.
  38. Resin bonding to wet substrate 1. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992 Jan;23(1):39-41.
  39. The overwet phenomenon: a scanning electron microscopic study of surface moisture in the acid-conditioned, resin-dentin interface. Am J Dent 1996 Jun;9(3):109-114.
  40. Effect of solvent and rewetting time on dentin adhesion. Quintessence Int 2001 May;32(5):385-390.
  41. Estudo Comparativo da Infiltração Marginal Com Duas Gerações de Adesivos: Total-Etch Em Sistema Monofrasco Versus Sistema Self-Etching. Porto: Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto; 2004.
  42. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1997 Jul;13(4):218-227.
  43. Scanning electron microscopy examination of 3 different adhesive systems. Quintessence Int 2005 Oct;36(9):687-694.
  44. Marginal adaptation of an etch-and-rinse adhesive with a new type of solvent in class II cavities after artificial aging. Clin Oral Investig 2010 Dec;14(9):699-705.
  45. Some effects of water on dentin bonding. Dent Mater 1995 Mar;11(2):132-136.
  46. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992 Mar;8(2):125-130.
  47. Interfacial characteristics of adhesive luting resins and composites with dentine. Dent Mater 2007 Jul;23(7):829-839.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.