The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

Register      Login

SEARCH WITHIN CONTENT

FIND ARTICLE

Volume / Issue

Online First

Archive
Related articles

VOLUME 18 , ISSUE 2 ( February, 2017 ) > List of Articles

RESEARCH ARTICLE

Assessment of Coronal Leakage of Temporary Restorations in Root Canal-treated Teeth: An in vitro Study

Ajay Nagpal, Pankaj K Srivastava, Gaurav Setya, Alankrita Chaudhary, Kuldeep Dhanker

Citation Information : Nagpal A, Srivastava PK, Setya G, Chaudhary A, Dhanker K. Assessment of Coronal Leakage of Temporary Restorations in Root Canal-treated Teeth: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017; 18 (2):126-130.

DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2002

Published Online: 01-02-2017

Copyright Statement:  Copyright © 2017; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd.


Abstract

Introduction

Coronal leakage is one of the constant concerns in routine dental practice. It is one of the factors responsible for the failure of root canal therapy. Permanent restorations should be given as soon as possible after the completion of root canal therapy. If unavoidable, provisional restoration should be given in such a way that it maximally reduced the leakage of microorganisms and fluids from the external environment into the canal space. Hence, we evaluated the effect of saliva on the coronal leakage of temporary restorations.

Materials and methods

Biomechanical preparation of the root canals of 204 fresh mandibular first premolar teeth was done using endodontic files with intermittent irrigation of sodium hypochlorite solution and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Alternate irrigation with normal saline was done periodically. After preparation, drying of the canals was done using paper points followed by sealing of the apical foramen. For the assessment of the microleakage, Siqueira et al apparatus and method was used. All the specimens were divided into four groups based on the provisional restorative material used. All the groups were further divided into three subgroups based on the presence and absence of intracanal medicaments. Verissimo et al's criteria were used to check the turbidity at 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-week interval respectively. All the results were analyzed by Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. Chi-square test was used to measure the level of significance, and p < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

In group I, all the subgroups’ specimens showed significant difference at 1 week's time. Only the subgroup with no intracanal medicaments in Cavit-containing provisional restoration showed nonsignificant alterations. Statistically significant alterations were seen at 1, 2, and 3 weeks’ interval in all the subgroups except for one with intracanal medicaments.

Conclusion

All the temporary restorative materials were not able to prevent microleakage after 1 week's time, with worst bacterial resistance shown by Ketac Molar and ionomer restorative material. Future studies are advocated for better prognosis of root canal therapy.

How to cite this article

Srivastava PK, Nagpal A, Setya G, Kumar S, Chaudhary A, Dhanker K. Assessment of Coronal Leakage of Temporary Restorations in Root Canal-treated Teeth: An in vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(2):126-130.


PDF Share
  1. Coronal microleakage of three temporary restorative materials: an in vitro study. J Endod 2004 Aug;30(8):582-584.
  2. An in vitro evaluation of four materials as barriers to coronal microleakage in root-filled teeth. Int Endod J 2002 Sep;35(9):729-734.
  3. Microleakage between endodontic temporary restorative materials placed at different times. J Endod 1999 Jun;25(6):453-456.
  4. A laboratory study of coronal microleakage using four temporary restorative materials. Int Endod J 2002 Apr;35(4):315-320.
  5. Sealing ability of intermediate restoratives used in endodontics. J Endod 1985 Jun;11(6):241-244.
  6. In vitro study to compare the coronal microleakage of Tempit Ultra F, Tempit, IRM, and Cavit by using the fluid transport model. J Endod 2008 Apr;34(4):442-444.
  7. Time-dependence of coronal seal of temporary materials used in endodontics. Aust Endod J 2008 Dec;34(3):89-93.
  8. Coronal leakage of two root canal sealers containing calcium hydroxide after exposure to human saliva. J Endod 1999 Jan;25(1):14-16.
  9. Evaluation of time required for recontamination of coronally sealed canals medicated with calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine. Int Endod J 2003 Sep;36(9):604-609.
  10. Coronal leakage of four intracanal medications after exposure to human saliva in the presence of a temporary filling material. Indian J Dent Res 2010 Jan-Mar;21(1):35-39.
  11. Recurrent apical periodontitis and late endodontic treatment failure related to coronal leakage: a case report. J Endod 2011 Aug;37(8):1171-1175.
  12. Periradicular status related to the quality of coronal restorations and root canal fillings in a Brazilian population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005 Oct;100(3):369-374.
  13. Comparison of preparation design and material thickness on microbial leakage through Cavit using a tooth model system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008 Apr;105(4):530-535.
  14. Effect of root canal filling/sealer systems on apical endotoxin penetration: a coronal leakage evaluation. J Endod 2005 Aug;31(8):599-604.
  15. Periradicular status and quality of root canal fillings and coronal restorations in an urban Colombian population. J Endod 2013 May;39(5):600-604.
  16. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004 May;30(5):289-301.
  17. Microleakage of five temporary endodontic restorative materials. J Esthet Dent 1990 Nov-Dec;2(6):166-169.
  18. Experimental model: dye penetration of extensive interim restorations used during endodontic treatment while under load in a multiple axis chewing simulator. J Endod 2007 Oct;33(10):1243-1246.
  19. Effect of repeated vertical loads on microleakage of IRM and calcium sulfate-based temporary fillings. J Endod 2001 Dec;27(12):724-729.
  20. , Jr A microleakage study of temporary restorative materials used in endodontics. J Endod. 1989;15:569-572.
  21. A temporary filling material may cause cusp deflection, infractions and fractures in endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 2005 Sep;38(9):653-657.
  22. In vitro evaluation of the effectiveness of the chemomechanical preparation against Enterococcus faecalis after single- or multiple-visit root canal treatment. Braz Oral Res 2007 Oct-Dec;21(4):308-313.
  23. Coronal leakage of provisional restorative materials used in endodontics with and without intracanal medication after exposure to human saliva. Saudi Endod J 2016 Dec;6(2):77-81.
  24. Temporary restorative materials used by Brazilian dental schools during and after endodontic treatment. Passo Fundo 2013 Jan-Apr;18(1):88-93.
  25. Microbial microleakage in temporary restorative materials after post space preparation. Rev Odonto Ciênc 2008 Apr-Jun;23(2):187-191.
  26. In vitro evaluation of coronal microleakage of some temporary sealing materials used in endodontic and three different endodontic sealers. JSM Dent 2014;2(3):1031-1034.
  27. Evaluation of sealing ability, pH and flow rate of three calcium hydroxide-based sealers. Endod Dent Traumatol 1995 Oct;11(5):225-228.
  28. Assessment of coronal leakage of a new temporary light–curing filling material in endodontically treated teeth. Indian J Dent Res 2014;25(3):321-324.
PDF Share

© Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) LTD.